Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Computers & IT > Networking
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-01-2006, 13:33   #1
moontour
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
moontour is an unknown quantity at this point
Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.

So, since i got an Etec XG-2180 wireless router to go with my NTL 1meg connection back in October, I have had horrendous problems with maintaining a wireless connction. I have tried everything can think of.
  • Changing router channel
  • changing router location
  • enabling and disabling security
  • Disabling Wireless Zero Configuratiion
So, i run 1 laptop with an intel Wlan 802.11b/g, another laptop with a BT Voyager 1060 PCMIA wireless laptop adaptor, and a pc with a BT Voyager 1040 PCI wireless card.(all run windows xp home).

Basically, the wireless router performs great for anything from 10minutes to 2 dayss, then drops the connection to all three computers simaltaneously. At this stage, the wireless router cannot be pinged, and the oly way to get online is to 'repair' the connection, or to reset the router.

i am including the ntl250 cable modem logs, as the poblem seems to be between the modem and the router.The 62232 errors correlate with the router losing connection to the computers. Anybody got any ideas? i have fixed this problem by wiring the house with CAT 5 but would like the freedom of wireless.

First Time Last Time Counts Level ID Text
Time Not Established Time Not Established 5 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Tue Jan 24 01:07:34 2006 Tue Jan 24 01:07:34 2006 62232 Critical(3) 84000100 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/Q...
Mon Jan 23 23:17:28 2006 Mon Jan 23 23:17:28 2006 1 Critical(3) 82000400 Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Un...
Tue Jan 24 01:08:01 2006 Tue Jan 24 01:08:01 2006 101 Critical(3) 84000200 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire FEC f...
Mon Jan 23 19:33:08 2006 Mon Jan 23 19:33:08 2006 1 Critical(3) 82000500 Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - ...
Time Not Established Time Not Established 11 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Time Not Established Time Not Established 1 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Tue Dec 13 04:54:49 2005 Tue Dec 13 04:54:49 2005 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Tue Dec 13 04:54:40 2005 Tue Dec 13 04:54:40 2005 4 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Tue Dec 13 04:54:35 2005 Tue Dec 13 04:54:35 2005 1 Critical(3) 82000400 Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Un...
Tue Dec 13 04:54:19 2005 Tue Dec 13 04:54:19 2005 1 Critical(3) 84000500 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync
Tue Dec 13 02:08:49 2005 Tue Dec 13 02:08:49 2005 44 Critical(3) 82000500 Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - ...
Sat Dec 10 09:16:56 2005 Sat Dec 10 09:16:56 2005 32 Critical(3) 82000500 Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - ...
Wed Dec 07 10:32:40 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:32:40 2005 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Wed Dec 07 10:32:32 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:32:32 2005 2 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Wed Dec 07 10:32:28 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:32:28 2005 1 Critical(3) 82000700 Unicast Ranging Received Abort Response - Re- initializing MAC
Wed Dec 07 10:32:15 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:32:15 2005 2 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Wed Dec 07 10:32:09 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:32:09 2005 1 Critical(3) 82000700 Unicast Ranging Received Abort Response - Re- initializing MAC
Wed Dec 07 10:30:10 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:30:10 2005 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Wed Dec 07 10:29:54 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:29:54 2005 2 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Wed Dec 07 10:29:49 2005 Wed Dec 07 10:29:49 2005 1 Critical(3) 82000700 Unicast Ranging Received Abort Response - Re- initializing MAC
Wed Dec 07 09:46:59 2005 Wed Dec 07 09:46:59 2005 2 Critical(3) 82000500 Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - ...
Time Not Established Time Not Established 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Time Not Established Time Not Established 4 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Time Not Established Time Not Established 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Time Not Established Time Not Established 2 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Time Not Established Time Not Established 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Time Not Established Time Not Established 2 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Time Not Established Time Not Established 1 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Time Not Established Time Not Established 2 Critical(3) 82000200 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
Time Not Established Time Not Established 9 Critical(3) 68000300 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response.
Fri Oct 14 09:03:08 2005 Fri Oct 14 09:03:08 2005 1 Critical(3) 84000400 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC S...
moontour is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 31-01-2006, 13:46   #2
chrischambers
Inactive
 
chrischambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: south Coast of UK
Age: 50
Services: currently with NTL broadband / SKY tv
Posts: 9
chrischambers is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.

it looks that your wireless router is ok, and that the problem is the wireless side.

Have you looked around the area of you house for anything that might be interfiling with you reception. As my boss had a problem with his TV when his next door nebaur turn on is CB.
chrischambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-01-2006, 14:16   #3
moontour
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
moontour is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.

don't think it's an interference problem as it happens at all times of the day-have checked with neighbour's and they don't have wireless internet , or phone. i have also tried evry channel and it just does the same thing. am wondering if it's some kind of breakdown between the router and the modem beacuse of the sync timing errors.
moontour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-01-2006, 14:41   #4
Hom3r
Mum 30/09/20 Dad 08/08/24
 
Hom3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, A secret Moonbase (shh don't tell anybody)
Age: 56
Services: 2 x TiVo 360s, SH5. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, Ton's of Smart Home stuff, & Cuddy Toy
Posts: 17,239
Hom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny stars
Hom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny starsHom3r has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.

Wireless has caused a lot of problems fro members, the reason could be caused by a number of factors.

Cordless telephones (use the same frequency as wireless)
microwave ovens
dimmer switches
thickness of walls

I would try a position the Wi-Fi router as close to the centre of the house and away from other electrical goods (I had this problem but disapeared after I changed the channel).
__________________
I'm a Trustee & Secretary for a local charity

STAY AT HOME: I found out that mum will never walk again as the coronavirus attacked her nervous system. She died on September 30th.
Hom3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-01-2006, 15:40   #5
handyman
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nr Carnforth
Age: 49
Services: M6 Keele
Posts: 5,462
handyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny star
handyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to handyman
Re: Wireless router problem solved by good old Cat5 Cable.

Bluetooth is also a interference with wireless.
handyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:38.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum