Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
14-09-2025, 21:18
|
#91
|
Just a Geek
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,250
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
If you are going to jail someone for incitement in text form ie X then imo Joe Brand if she did say something about throwing acid on him is equally as guilty of incitement even if it was a joke and as she has more of a following than Lucy Connolly she is even more guilty imo . Hate is hate throwing in race should not make it any worse an offense it is unbalanced
If some white moron decides to beat me to death I can rest in peace easy knowing its not as bad as someone from a different race doing it
__________________
Is your muffin buttered? Would you like me to assign someone to butter your muffin?
|
|
|
14-09-2025, 21:18
|
#92
|
An Awesome Dude
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
As Kirk was something of a free speech absolutist I doubt he’d approve of doxxing people and getting them fired in the way that website seeks to.
|
You might be right..... That may be stepping over the line!! (As this country does alot)
Thanx for removiing the link,I didnt mean any harm by it.......
|
|
|
14-09-2025, 21:32
|
#93
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,784
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss
If you are going to jail someone for incitement in text form ie X then imo Joe Brand if she did say something about throwing acid on him is equally as guilty of incitement even if it was a joke and as she has more of a following than Lucy Connolly she is even more guilty imo . Hate is hate throwing in race should not make it any worse an offense it is unbalanced
If some white moron decides to beat me to death I can rest in peace easy knowing its not as bad as someone from a different race doing it
|
Brand was clearly joking, though. It would be impossible to miss from the full context.
But I also think Connolly fell short of needing a conviction, albeit it was a horrible tweet.
I am not a free speech absolutist. I think if someone is advocating violence against someone seriously, they should be arrested. Someone at the far-right march said that of Starmer, and I don't know why he wasn't arrested for advocating violence against a politican.
|
|
|
Yesterday, 12:26
|
#94
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,109
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Brand was clearly joking, though. It would be impossible to miss from the full context.
But I also think Connolly fell short of needing a conviction, albeit it was a horrible tweet.
I am not a free speech absolutist. I think if someone is advocating violence against someone seriously, they should be arrested. Someone at the far-right march said that of Starmer, and I don't know why he wasn't arrested for advocating violence against a politican.
|
It just shows why hate speech laws are a mess, and should be removed and re-thought.
the very term "hate speech" is too broad. Why can't I say something hateful?
You can't legislate away emotions.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
Yesterday, 23:10
|
#95
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,275
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
It just shows why hate speech laws are a mess, and should be removed and re-thought.
the very term "hate speech" is too broad. Why can't I say something hateful?
You can't legislate away emotions.
|
A good article here about the law around it and why Musk did not break it but someone calling for Starmer to be killed did break the law.
A key point is whether inflammatory speech carries the threat of provoking “immediate unlawful violence" This is the threshold set by Parliament that such speech must cross to constitute criminality.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-break-the-law
|
|
|
Yesterday, 23:42
|
#96
|
Trollsplatter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,137
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
A good article here about the law around it and why Musk did not break it but someone calling for Starmer to be killed did break the law.
A key point is whether inflammatory speech carries the threat of provoking “immediate unlawful violence" This is the threshold set by Parliament that such speech must cross to constitute criminality.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-break-the-law
|
Anyone know off-hand what the actual legal status of the term “hate speech” is - does it have a legal basis or is it shorthand for something legislation describes differently?
|
|
|
Today, 00:13
|
#97
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 62
Services: Aquiss FTTP (900M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 29,802
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
Well I guess you can do the same search as me ...
Quote:
No, "hate speech" does not have a single, specific legal definition in the UK, but rather several laws address specific acts that are considered hate crimes or offenses.
|
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_s...United_Kingdom
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
Today, 07:27
|
#98
|
Trollsplatter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,137
|
Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
|
I’d rather leave that to the overnight staff when I have these thoughts just as I’m getting into bed
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29.
|