02-04-2025, 19:52
|
#1021
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,669
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
You seem to think that they did it in order to teach a lesson. That is, without doubt, disproportionate and a misuse of the power of detention. Make up your mind.
|
No, I suggested that this may be the case. I don't know for sure either way.
---------- Post added at 19:52 ---------- Previous post was at 19:50 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Do you even realise how incrediby daft that definition is ?
By that standard anyone can simply say anything anyone else says is "malicious or offensive".
Not to mention in this case the comments were in a PRIVATE conversation between unrelated people.
|
I've already addressed these points further up thread.
|
|
|
02-04-2025, 20:52
|
#1022
|
Trollsplatter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,049
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
No, I suggested that this may be the case. I don't know for sure either way..
|
Which brings us, full circle, to the somewhat troubling way you clapped like a performing seal when you posted the news item yesterday. Uncritical approval of police action whose motivations you do not know, and aspects of which you admit may not look great, is not a good look on you.
|
|
|
02-04-2025, 21:45
|
#1023
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,985
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
No, if it was clearly nothing offensive like 'Do you like apple pie', you would be given short thrift if you complained.
|
No, sorry I consider “do you like apple pie” as a pseudo racial slur, like “cotton picker” and I’m going to complain about you and have you arrested and detained for 8hrs.
Quote:
If someone inadvertently offended someone, for example by using a dated term for a black person, and they genuinely didn't mean to be offensive, they would be only too pleased to negate the offense caused by withdrawing and apologising for the remark. If they refuse to do so, this would call into question whether if was accidental and if it was deliberately said in order to cause upset. The incident would then be viewed in an entirely different light.
|
By your standard, accidental or not, they would be arrested and detained for 8hrs whilst investigated before any option was given to apologise, indeed they would not even be advised about what it was they said was supposedly offensive.
You are clueless about what you are advocating…..clueless.
Perhaps it is down to whatever cognitive disability you claim to have, in that case I would reevaluate your statements on the matter as your often cited cognitive disability is potentially affecting your reasoning on the subject matter.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
03-04-2025, 08:36
|
#1024
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 14,554
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
No, sorry I consider “do you like apple pie” as a pseudo racial slur, like “cotton picker” and I’m going to complain about you and have you arrested and detained for 8hrs.
By your standard, accidental or not, they would be arrested and detained for 8hrs whilst investigated before any option was given to apologise, indeed they would not even be advised about what it was they said was supposedly offensive.
You are clueless about what you are advocating…..clueless.
Perhaps it is down to whatever cognitive disability you claim to have, in that case I would reevaluate your statements on the matter as your often cited cognitive disability is potentially affecting your reasoning on the subject matter.
|
do you get a certificate for that?
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
03-04-2025, 22:25
|
#1025
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,669
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Which brings us, full circle, to the somewhat troubling way you clapped like a performing seal when you posted the news item yesterday. Uncritical approval of police action whose motivations you do not know, and aspects of which you admit may not look great, is not a good look on you.
|
We are more like going round & round in circles, with you making rude comments. I'm surprised at this as you have previously said that people should be more polite on here.
Again, I said that the police seemed to be going overboard.
Neither you nor I know the reasons why the police behaved as they did, they may or may not have been justified. Any investigation should hopefully find this out.
---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
No, sorry I consider “do you like apple pie” as a pseudo racial slur, like “cotton picker” and I’m going to complain about you and have you arrested and detained for 8hrs.
By your standard, accidental or not, they would be arrested and detained for 8hrs whilst investigated before any option was given to apologise, indeed they would not even be advised about what it was they said was supposedly offensive.
You are clueless about what you are advocating…..clueless.
Perhaps it is down to whatever cognitive disability you claim to have, in that case I would reevaluate your statements on the matter as your often cited cognitive disability is potentially affecting your reasoning on the subject matter.
|
Feel free to go through the official channels and make a complaint & let me know how you get on. Of course, you won't, because, as opposed to playing devil's advocate, you just like to troll various threads with silly comments/arguments.
---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
do you get a certificate for that?
|
I don't understand what you mean. What kind of certificate are you referring to? For disabilities??
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 07:27
|
#1026
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 14,554
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
We are more like going round & round in circles, with you making rude comments. I'm surprised at this as you have previously said that people should be more polite on here.
Again, I said that the police seemed to be going overboard.
Neither you nor I know the reasons why the police behaved as they did, they may or may not have been justified. Any investigation should hopefully find this out.
---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------
Feel free to go through the official channels and make a complaint & let me know how you get on. Of course, you won't, because, as opposed to playing devil's advocate, you just like to troll various threads with silly comments/arguments.
---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------
I don't understand what you mean. What kind of certificate are you referring to? For disabilities??
|
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 08:46
|
#1027
|
NUTS !!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,198
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.
|
Strange question. But I would have thought his posts, obsessional tendencies along with complete lack of understandings of other opinions other than his own would be proof enough.
__________________
Oh what fun it is
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 08:50
|
#1028
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 14,554
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
Strange question. But I would have thought his posts, obsessional tendencies along with complete lack of understandings of other opinions other than his own would be proof enough. 
|
i don't know who you are referring too i assume it's a theoretical person
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 09:52
|
#1029
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,985
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
you just like to troll various threads with silly comments/arguments.
|
I can only assume you were looking in the mirror as you typed that out.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 11:00
|
#1030
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,669
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
I can only assume you were looking in the mirror as you typed that out.
|
Examples?
---------- Post added at 11:00 ---------- Previous post was at 10:58 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.
|
I see. The only certificate that i'm aware of is one to claim Council Tax exemption.
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 11:12
|
#1031
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,168
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.
|
There’s no certificate, as with pretty much any diagnosis just a letter from the GP confirming whatever condition but you need to request it and in some cases GPs charge for it, usually about £10 but this isn’t common.
__________________
From Jim Cornette:
“Ty, Fy, bye”
Last edited by Russ; 04-04-2025 at 11:15.
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 11:16
|
#1032
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,669
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Just seen a post on facebook where a group of paedophile hunters are complaining that Welsh police have again been to see one of their team regarding posts he made on the platform.
These people seem to think that laws don't apply when talking about (alleged) paedophiles. Just because someone dislikes the possibility of someone belonging to a certain group (maybe with good reason) doesn't exempt them from the law of the land.
---------- Post added at 11:16 ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
There’s no certificate, as with pretty much any diagnosis just a letter from the GP confirming whatever condition but you need to request it and in some cases GPs charge for it, usually about £10 but this isn’t common.
|
Yes, that's been my experience too, (though they've never charged me).
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 11:19
|
#1033
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,168
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Just seen a post on facebook where a group of paedophile hunters are complaining that Welsh police have again been to see one of their team regarding posts he made on the platform.
These people seem to think that laws don't apply when talking about (alleged) paedophiles. Just because someone dislikes the possibility of someone belonging to a certain group (maybe with good reason) doesn't exempt them from the law of the land.
---------- Post added at 11:16 ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 ----------
Yes, that's been my experience too, (though they've never charged me).
|
Without knowing what/who you’re talking about it’s hard to comment on whatever the hell you’re talking about but the only times the police have ever been in touch with us (and any groups we associate with) has been when comments have been posted that could either incite retaliation crimes or jeopardise the case.
Either way any decent hunter team ought to have an admin who monitors the chat in live stings etc and removes such posts asap.
__________________
From Jim Cornette:
“Ty, Fy, bye”
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 17:34
|
#1034
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 14,554
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Without knowing what/who you’re talking about it’s hard to comment on whatever the hell you’re talking about but the only times the police have ever been in touch with us (and any groups we associate with) has been when comments have been posted that could either incite retaliation crimes or jeopardise the case.
Either way any decent hunter team ought to have an admin who monitors the chat in live stings etc and removes such posts asap.
|
a bit like Alfred in the Bat cave monitoring the bat computer assisting you boy wonders to clean up Gotham city, jiminy jillikers, do you get a cape mask and utility belt.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
04-04-2025, 17:52
|
#1035
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,168
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
No but we do get a free keyring and a pen.
__________________
From Jim Cornette:
“Ty, Fy, bye”
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51.
|