Which results look better?
30-10-2009, 15:35
|
#1
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Preston, Lancashire
Posts: 260
|
Which results look better?
Signal
This page provides important information about the status and quality of the communications between your cable modem and the cable modem network.
Downstream Channel
The data shown in the table below provides information about the signal coming from the network to your cable modem.
Downstream Status
Operational
Channel ID
5
Downstream Frequency
331000000 Hz
Modulation
256QAM
Bit Rate
10240000 bits/sec
Power Level
5.1 dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio
41.4 dB
Upstream Channel
The data shown in the table below provides information about the signal being transmitted to the network from your cable modem.
Upstream Status
Operational
Channel ID
2
Upstream Frequency
25800000 Hz
Modulation
16QAM
Bit Rate
512000 bits/sec
Power Level
29.0 dBmV
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal
This page provides important information about the status and quality of the communications between your cable modem and the cable modem network.
Downstream Channel
The data shown in the table below provides information about the signal coming from the network to your cable modem.
Downstream Status
Operational
Channel ID
5
Downstream Frequency
331000000 Hz
Modulation
256QAM
Bit Rate
10240000 bits/sec
Power Level
-1.2 dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio
41.1 dB
Upstream Channel
The data shown in the table below provides information about the signal being transmitted to the network from your cable modem.
Upstream Status
Operational
Channel ID
3
Upstream Frequency
29200000 Hz
Modulation
16QAM
Bit Rate
512000 bits/sec
Power Level
35.5 dBmV
|
|
|
30-10-2009, 17:35
|
#2
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: At My Desk
Services: Virgin Media V6 XL TV - 1Gb Broadband
Posts: 3,009
|
Re: Which results look better?
If I am correct the second lot the upstream power level is too low.
Are you having connection issues?
|
|
|
30-10-2009, 17:58
|
#3
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a world of no buffering!!
Services: Samsung V+ XL TV
XL Phone
30Mb Superhub
Samsung Galaxy 3 32GB sd card In a world of no buffering!
Posts: 20,915
|
Re: Which results look better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chambohambo
Power Level
29.0 dBmV
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Level
35.5 dBmV
|
Actually the first one is to low.
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 05:41
|
#4
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: At My Desk
Services: Virgin Media V6 XL TV - 1Gb Broadband
Posts: 3,009
|
Re: Which results look better?
Dammit I meant the first one but 35 isn't brilliant tho
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 06:33
|
#5
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a world of no buffering!!
Services: Samsung V+ XL TV
XL Phone
30Mb Superhub
Samsung Galaxy 3 32GB sd card In a world of no buffering!
Posts: 20,915
|
Re: Which results look better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadbandking
Dammit I meant the first one but 35 isn't brilliant tho
|
It is within spec check the sticky
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 14:26
|
#6
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Preston, Lancashire
Posts: 260
|
Re: Which results look better?
Thank you all for replying back, also can I ask what type of problems can a low upstream power level cause?
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 19:37
|
#7
|
|
Guest
Location: Untied Kingdom
Services: Broadband M (10MB)
M TV , M Phone
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Which results look better?
|
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 20:16
|
#8
|
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 13,044
|
Re: Which results look better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chambohambo
Thank you all for replying back, also can I ask what type of problems can a low upstream power level cause?
|
Have a read of the attached PDF.
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 20:33
|
#9
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a world of no buffering!!
Services: Samsung V+ XL TV
XL Phone
30Mb Superhub
Samsung Galaxy 3 32GB sd card In a world of no buffering!
Posts: 20,915
|
Re: Which results look better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chambohambo
Thank you all for replying back, also can I ask what type of problems can a low upstream power level cause?
|
Loss of connection.
---------- Post added at 21:33 ---------- Previous post was at 21:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Have a read of the attached PDF.
|
What country and network does that actually apply to as Virgin has the Knowsley platform and the Langley/Bromley platform with different QAM's and power levels as shown in the stickies.
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 21:10
|
#10
|
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 13,044
|
Re: Which results look better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova
Loss of connection.
---------- Post added at 21:33 ---------- Previous post was at 21:31 ----------
What country and network does that actually apply to as Virgin has the Knowsley platform and the Langley/Bromley platform with different QAM's and power levels as shown in the stickies.
|
Fair point except that the OP wanted to know the "type of problems" that could be expected with a low upstream power level.
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 21:21
|
#11
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a world of no buffering!!
Services: Samsung V+ XL TV
XL Phone
30Mb Superhub
Samsung Galaxy 3 32GB sd card In a world of no buffering!
Posts: 20,915
|
Re: Which results look better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Fair point except that the OP wanted to know the "type of problems" that could be expected with a low upstream power level.
|
No I wanted to know what country so we could compare them.
As for information a nice find.
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 21:59
|
#12
|
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 13,044
|
Re: Which results look better?
@Moldova
The site is Chinese so far as I can tell. Which doesn't help you.
To my mind, since the document refers to DOCSIS 1/2 behaviours, it is country independent.
Would you agree?
|
|
|
31-10-2009, 23:25
|
#13
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
|
Re: Which results look better?
I would recommend highly http://bradyvolpe.com/ for those who want to swot on cable networks a bit. It does assume some knowledge so be aware.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00.
|