https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1e98w35qyjo
Though as of 2.30pm the BBC is still pretending not to know it was a man because he had long hair and was wearing a dress. To be clear about it, they had a local Canadian journalist on the News channel very early this morning who stated plainly that the killer was a man. Every journalist in the world covering this story knows it was a man. However, those working in newsrooms where gender ideology is more important than reporting the facts of a horrific mass murder are hiding behind the lack of an official ID, which as we know doesn’t hinder them under other circumstances, where they routinely use the phrase ‘named locally as…’
Once the BBC is cornered into using its most recently approved weasel phrase ‘biologically male’ we can start talking about exactly what distinction they’re trying to draw here, seeing as these sorts of mass killings by actual women are *vanishingly* rare.
Join CF
You are here: 
