Quote:
Originally Posted by sherer
They should work 24/7 and get it finished on time or earlier or face financial penalties. They want to finish late to get more money. They should be rewarded for finishing early.
|
Ummm ... this already happens. There are penalties for finishing late, and bonuses for finishing early. Dualling part of the A500 between Stoke and Nantwich was finished months ahead of schedule, earning the contractor a nice wee pot of money. That, however, was a completely new piece of road, so there was virtually no disruption while building it and no need for complex traffic management.
At the Thelwall Viaduct, they are working on crumbling old concrete bridge supports, which is vastly more complicated than just closing a road to re-pave it. It's taking ages due to the complicated nature of the work, not because the contractor is spinning it out to make more money.
They do close stretches of British motorway when resurfacing is required. The work is done overnight in order to cause minimum disruption. A stretch of the M1 between the M25 and Hemel Hempstead has recently been done in this way (actually, only the entry/exit slips were completely closed - they kept one lane of through traffic open and re-surfaced one lane at a time, overnight, for a week. It still caused huge tailbaks, even at midnight on a Sunday/Monday, as I found out to my cost
) But you can only do this when it's just the tarmac that's worn out and needs to be replaced. When the underlying structure of the road begins to decay, you have to dig the lot up and start again. Again, that takes time, and you just can't shut an entire motorway for six weeks while you do the work.