You can't get me I'm part of the Union........

[RichardCoulter]

Originally Posted by Peter_

I believe your relationship is purely a figment of your imagination, nothing more.

You come across as desperate to make people believe you are in close contact with upper management but continually try to pry information from people on here that your so called friends would have already told you if your so called connections actually existed.

You really believe that my colleagues and myself should not feel anger over the way we were treated especially with regards to the lies used as part of the closure, you are delusional if you think otherwise.

So you keep saying over and over and over again. I have no interest in your view upon this matter and I doubt anyone else on the forum cares about who I do or don't know either- it's simply not relevant.

I must remind you that what you post on here is legally regarded as having been published- haven't you been listening to the news?

Appropriate action has been taken regarding your allegations and decision not to take down the letter.

Originally Posted by Peter_

Not in bold then??.................. oh of course you are not part of the Cableforum team and the forum host position was on another forum remember and even that was shortlived.

I didn't tell you to take it down, I requested you to. Your decision not to do so has been noted.

Your posting style and nonsensical comments are now coming across as extremely immature.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

You are coming across as bitter, selfish and vindictive- most unpleasant.

I advise you to remove the letter immediately.

no need to remove it the author asked that it be put out to as many staff as possible and there are a lot of vm staff on this forum as members and or guests .

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

no need to remove it the author asked that it be put out to as many staff as possible and there are a lot of vm staff on this forum as members and or guests .

A decision if needed that will be made by a real moderator of this forum.

Originally Posted by Peter_

No I was a union rep and that was not sent to me but sourced externally and the is no valid reason not to post it as it states Virgin Media are attempting to undermine people by not following the correct route with outside scrutineers as that means an easily rigged vote.

How do you know all this? Its clear VM are not going to post their views on a forum so you are only seeing what the union are saying.

[RichardCoulter]

Originally Posted by Sirius

A decision if needed that will be made by a real moderator of this forum.

Why, do unreal moderators exist?

[MovedGoalPosts]

General Warning: Debate the issues, not the personalities of the people making the posts. If you can't do this without resorting to snide remarks over people's motives and veiled threats towards each other then butt out before the Cable Forum Team intervenes.

Originally Posted by Peter_

No I was a union rep and that was not sent to me but sourced externally and the is no valid reason not to post it as it states Virgin Media are attempting to undermine people by not following the correct route with outside scrutineers as that means an easily rigged vote.

But internally the letter states collective bargaining is a voluntary agreement so they can end it anyway, however they want the view of their people rather than just giving the union notice. To me that seems a reasonable approach or am I missing something?

The letter also states that this in no way affects their right to union representation on any other issues so can't understand all this de recogtition and union busting talk

[papa smurf]

any union member wishing to place an order for an oil drum and a pile of broken pallets please do so before monday 19/11/12 ....

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

I must remind you that what you post on here is legally regarded as having been published- haven't you been listening to the news?

Appropriate action has been taken regarding your allegations and decision not to take down the letter.



I didn't tell you to take it down, I requested you to. Your decision not to do so has been noted.

So veiled threats and stupidity.

This is a private forum and I can post what I want as long as it is within the guidelines of the forums rules as set out by the forum team and owners, if they so wish they can remove or edit any post on this forum if they deem it needs removing or editing.

As I am posting as a private individual who has not posted their identity or even their own private email address on this forum how on earth could any action be taken against me as the team will not disclose my email address to anyone as that is the forum agreement and secondly that is basically a proxy email address that forwards emails to my own personal email account.

I remember a post in the Closure of the Albert Dock thread where you amazingly tried to state that no one called peter was ever a member of the CWU as John East had told you this was a fact, this was a childish attempt to get me to post my name on an open forum and at the time I informed you that the were quite a few people at the Albert Dock in the union called Peter, personally I think you have delusions of grandeur as you try to insist that you have the ear of both Virgin Media high management and alternatively the ear of the CWU.

So get real and try and understand how a forum works and possibly send a PM to the team for help and guidance as to how this forum is run or you could just click this link below and read the forum rules so CLICK ME

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

The information was supplied by the employee insight and engagement manager at Virgin Media, I think that she will have more of an idea of what's going on than someone who hasn't worked there for nearly a year.

I've worked at VM for 17 years, 12 at management level.

I know loads of people, I talk with executive directors on a daily basis. I think I have more if an idea than you.................

---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:18 ----------

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

I advise you to remove the letter immediately.

No need it' s approved correspondence and in the public domain.

Only unapproved comments such as given in regular Grill sessions need to be censored.

---------- Post added at 22:26 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

I advise you to remove the letter immediately.

No need it' s approved correspondence and in the public domain.

Only unapproved comments such as given in regular Grill sessions need to be censored.

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by Pierre

No need it' s approved correspondence and in the public domain.

Only unapproved comments such as given in regular Grill sessions need to be censored.

Which obviously I do not have access to as I am not an employee and even when I was an employee I would never post anything not in the public domain as it is the quickest way to lose your job and job prospects.

looks like some people at VM are happy

https://twitter.com/HollyBranson/sta...944065/photo/1

Actually that could be a picture from the future - Virgin Medias apprentices and the potential future figure head of Virgin Group

[qasdfdsaq]

Yay for gender equality in the workplace?

I think its fair to say that John East wanted the letter to get to as many people as possible. My mate has had 3 unsolicited mails from 3 different union sources, with different content each time but every one a veilled threat of what VM sre going to do once the union are out of the way. The funny thing is each letter ends with join the union now for the reduced price of 5.19 - bit like VM's offers to new customers

I have removed a bunch of recent posts.

I, and the team, are sick of the attitude of certain members.
They know who they are, and the attitude will cease, or some forum memberships will be terminated.

Carry on please, and stick to the topic, not each other.