Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle
That where the lala land and reality steps in it wont money will be to replace the government funding so reducing burden to them. We will see no more nurses, doctors, specialist or beds or lets say there wont be enough numbers to offset the private treatment. We will see those queues become longer for high private intake treatment. We will likely see many not getting the care the should off because private healthcare overburdened the queues for that sector specialist care. It will FAIL then we will see the anger by the people that NHS has been destroyed.
MP's notorious liars NHS not safe in tories hands they dismantling it brick by brick.
|
Where is this removal of government funding?
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/...ases/DH_120676
Quote:
|
In line with the Government’s commitment to protect health spending, overall NHS spending will increase by 0.4% in real terms over the course of the Spending Review period. This includes a 1.3% increase in the resource budget, and a 17% decrease in capital spending. The administration budget will be reduced by 33%, and reinvested to support the delivery of NHS services.
|
Now you don't need the Pure Maths A Level I have to note that those budgets seem to be increasing in both nominal and real terms, indeed the reason that some areas are feeling the pinch is due to the government protecting the NHS budget and increasing it.
If you're offended by any reform to the NHS of this type I would simply point you to that we're the only state outside of communist ones that persists with this system.
Maybe the rest of the world's open, capitalist economies, many of whom use co-pay and use funding from private patients for public healthcare have a point?