Starmer’s chronicles

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

If you're banning people speaking to the press, that's an attack on free speech.

Not “the press” just certain people they don’t want to speak to.

You can’t compel somebody to speak to somebody they don’t want to speak to. They have no right to be spoken too.

That has no bearing on “free speech”.

You don’t understand free speech if you’re going down this route.

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Pierre

Not “the press” just certain people they don’t want to speak to.

You can’t compel somebody to speak to somebody they don’t want to speak to. They have no right to be spoken too.

That has no bearing on “free speech”.

You don’t understand free speech if you’re going down this route.

Reform has changed its policy. Its previously policy which my posts referenced had a bearing on free speech. Hopefully, you get and can agree with this.