Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
13-06-2006, 18:20
|
#1006
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 64
Posts: 4,232
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Any idea when we might get `Done` in Cambridge?
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 18:22
|
#1007
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,270
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pdjkeelan
Wythenshawe - Manchester - Using Samsung STB
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:34:20 GMT
1st 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 265 ms = 494611 Bytes/sec = approx 4115 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
|
ntl250 modem in wythenshawe not done yet, strange that, as i thought all wythenshawe went through the same place, arr well perhaps thursday.......
---
not that it would make any difference baz, but
http://www.ipchicken.com/
Name Address: bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 18:33
|
#1008
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brighton
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Brighton's got it. Oh, and we've got the speed upgrade too, after a reboot
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:32:03 GMT
1st 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1093 ms = 468.4 KB/sec, approx 3860 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
4th 512K took 1079 ms = 474.5 KB/sec, approx 3910 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 3871 Kbps, 3.78 Mbps
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 18:38
|
#1009
|
|
cf.member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winchester
Posts: 15
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
and Winchester
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:38:09 UTC
1st 128K took 250 ms = 524288 Bytes/sec = approx 4362 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 265 ms = 494611 Bytes/sec = approx 4115 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 281 ms = 466448 Bytes/sec = approx 3881 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 297 ms = 441320 Bytes/sec = approx 3672 kbits/sec
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 18:42
|
#1010
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
im upgraded to in sunderland..oooo its nice
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 18:51
|
#1011
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 41
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
where abouts in sunderland stu??? im in washington and still on 2 here through stb..
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 19:00
|
#1012
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 126
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Baz.
Which proxy do you use this will tell you
http://www.ipchicken.com/
I'am under
Name Address: bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net
But i'am still on 2mb
|
I'm on bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net too. Still 2mbit
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 19:22
|
#1013
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of UK
Age: 35
Services: 4mb BB
CATV
Phone
Posts: 21
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Im on a cosham cache, anyone in this area should be upgraded as i am.
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 19:40
|
#1014
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2005
Services: 20M, TV Large
Posts: 108
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Bedford, ntl home 120
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:39:25 UTC
1st 512K took 2172 ms = 235.7 KB/sec, approx 1942 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2157 ms = 237.4 KB/sec, approx 1956 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2171 ms = 235.8 KB/sec, approx 1943 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
4th 512K took 2157 ms = 237.4 KB/sec, approx 1956 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 1949 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 20:32
|
#1015
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Worthing, West Sussex
Posts: 15
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Grrr, I still haven't got it and I'm about 15miles west of Brighton so I thought that when Brighton got it, I would as well.
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 20:33
|
#1016
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shropshire
Services: VM National ADSL BB
Posts: 128
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Just rebooted my Samsung STB here in Stoke on Trent:
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:30:34 GMT
1st 128K took 209 ms = 627139 Bytes/sec = approx 5218 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 230 ms = 569878 Bytes/sec = approx 4741 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 256 ms = 512000 Bytes/sec = approx 4260 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 305 ms = 429744 Bytes/sec = approx 3575 kbits/sec
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 20:44
|
#1017
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 544
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
turned my modem on and off to reboot the thing here in Newcastle under lyme (just up the road from Stoke) and still no 4mb. Oh well, hopefully soon.
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 20:45
|
#1018
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Durham
Posts: 69
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Adcuz
Im on a cosham cache, anyone in this area should be upgraded as i am.
|
You sure? I'm in PO5 on a home 200
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:43:59 GMT
1st 512K took 2187 ms = 234.1 KB/sec, approx 1929 Kbps, 1.88 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2172 ms = 235.7 KB/sec, approx 1942 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
4th 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 1946 Kbps, 1.9 MbpsAnd that what I get, could you post yours please?
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 20:53
|
#1019
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of UK
Age: 35
Services: 4mb BB
CATV
Phone
Posts: 21
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sahil
You sure? I'm in PO5 on a home 200
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:43:59 GMT
1st 512K took 2187 ms = 234.1 KB/sec, approx 1929 Kbps, 1.88 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2172 ms = 235.7 KB/sec, approx 1942 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
4th 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 1946 Kbps, 1.9 MbpsAnd that what I get, could you post yours please?
|
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:54:29 GMT
1st 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps
4th 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 3885 Kbps, 3.8 Mbps
|
|
|
13-06-2006, 21:17
|
#1020
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ozsat
I have an ntl250 - have powered off for one minute and still runs averaging 2m on speedtest.
So I take it nothing in Oxford yet.
|
Guess not, then. I turned mine off for just a few seconds before rebooting -- mine's a different box than yours, in case that matters. (Mine's old kit -- SB4100, which I've had for 5 1/2 years.)
I hope someone else in Oxford can confirm/not-confirm the upgrade for you.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:13.
|