| 
	
		
 
 The General Cricket Thread 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-11-2005, 10:30 | #436 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: S Manchester Age: 77 
					Posts: 1,766
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by yesman
					
				 England 92 for 5,  2nd innings, maybe a defeat is on the cards   |  Yup .. we LOST  !!
 
Why am I not surprised ?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-11-2005, 13:00 | #437 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 
					Posts: 4,291
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			Quote from todays Metro....Flintoff : "We will wrap up Victory"Am I the only one smiling (failed the tebbit test miserably!).
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  21-12-2005, 16:59 | #438 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Minas Tirith, Gondor Age: 60 
					Posts: 3,458
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			Annual cricket quiz on BBC website . Managed to get 9/12.
 
Pity about the Pakistan series, but at least we got the last word and India to look forward to.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  21-12-2005, 17:03 | #439 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 
					Posts: 4,291
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Aragorn
					
				 Annual cricket quiz on BBC website . Managed to get 9/12.
  
Pity about the Pakistan series, but at least we got the last word and India to look forward to. |  and what last word was that? i thought the series was over when we won 3-1
---------- Post added at 16:03 ---------- Previous post was at 16:00 ---------- 
But seriously tho, it was a good series, and England did come up against a well disciplined Pakistani side. Its a shame we didnt see mor eof Vaughn in the series as I feel England missed his captaincy badly. Threcothic is nott as dynamic and it would have been good to see how Pakistan would have coped with unorthodox field positions, constant field changes, unsettling behavious (biut all very sporting) as employed in the ashes
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  31-12-2005, 01:36 | #440 |  
	| Guest 
				 
				
				Location: Cambridge 
					Posts: n/a
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			Honours for Ashes and 2012 heroes.  England's Ashes-winning cricketers and the team behind London's 2012 Olympic bid lead the sporting New Year Honours. Cricket captain Michael Vaughan and coach Duncan Fletcher are made OBEs, as are chairman of selectors David Graveney and tour manager Phil Neale. England's women's captain Clare Connor is also appointed an OBE, while the rest of the men's team become MBEs.
 
 
No surprise there then    |  
	|  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-03-2006, 12:47 | #441 |  
	| Guest 
				 
				
				Location: Cambridge 
					Posts: n/a
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			Nice One Cookie, a ton in his first test match    
Declaration overnight please Freddie    |  
	|  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  30-07-2006, 13:17 | #442 |  
	| cf.mega pornstar 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2006 
					Posts: 19,217
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-08-2006, 09:28 | #443 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Watford Services: Virgin Media 20Mb Broadband
Freeview 
					Posts: 65
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			congrats    to the England team for the latest test match series win thus winning me my bet at 13/2...    |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  18-08-2006, 02:07 | #444 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: W.Yorks Age: 43 
					Posts: 204
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			don't get me wrong, i'm not panesar's biggest fan(which is a difficult status to achieve anyway), but i don't get how he can get axed from the team for "not being able to bat and field" as long as matthew hoggard is still in the lineup
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  18-08-2006, 11:59 | #445 |  
	| cf.mega pornstar 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2006 
					Posts: 19,217
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Legendary_PSR
					
				 don't get me wrong, i'm not panesar's biggest fan(which is a difficult status to achieve anyway), but i don't get how he can get axed from the team for "not being able to bat and field" as long as matthew hoggard is still in the lineup |  You can carry one player, who can't bat/ field well quite easily, two is tricky though, in going for Hoggard, I suppose they chose the one which brings the most to the team.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  19-08-2006, 16:59 | #446 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: W.Yorks Age: 43 
					Posts: 204
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			i see ur point but, to be fair, take away the new ball and what exactly does hoggard bring to the team?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  20-08-2006, 19:00 | #447 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: W.Yorks Age: 43 
					Posts: 204
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			well, congratulations go to the umpire who ruined the reputation of an entire cricketing nation to prove the point that he is a complete and utter moron. 
when, in reality, his umpiring proved that anyway. i hope they ban him
  
yes, i've been in a critical mood all week. it does pass    |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  20-08-2006, 21:49 | #448 |  
	| Guest 
				 
				
				Location: Cambridge 
					Posts: n/a
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			Has anyone made allegations about the ball tampering accusation, I can't find any definite news about it anywhere. 
All I have heard is that the England team came back out to play, Pakistan didn't (under protest) and thats it    |  
	|  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  20-08-2006, 22:03 | #449 |  
	| Guest | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by yesman
					
				 Has anyone made allegations about the ball tampering accusation, I can't find any definite news about it anywhere. 
All I have heard is that the England team came back out to play, Pakistan didn't (under protest) and thats it   |  I've only read the BBC website report & there seems to still be doubt as to whether Pakistan were assumed to have conceded the game by the 'no show' after tea. The ball was alleged by the umpires to have been deliberately scuffed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...250.stm#tamper 
- the most annoying thing to me, is the seeming disregard for the thousands of paying customers in the crowd ....
		 |  
	|  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  20-08-2006, 22:09 | #450 |  
	| Guest 
				 
				
				Location: Cambridge 
					Posts: n/a
				      | 
				
				Re: Cricket
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by homealone
					
				 I've only read the BBC website report & there seems to still be doubt as to whether Pakistan were assumed to have conceded the game by the 'no show' after tea. The ball was alleged by the umpires to have been deliberately scuffedhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...250.stm#tamper 
- the most annoying thing to me, is the seeming disregard for the thousands of paying customers in the crowd .... |  The picture is clearer now - thanks Gaz    |  
	|  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:17. |