16-10-2003, 12:26
|
#16
|
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,596
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tiptoes
So all those home wokers connecting to their works Exhange server for their email are buggered.
|
sounds like it. ntl strikes again.
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 12:29
|
#17
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Surrey
Age: 59
Services: Virgin stuff
Posts: 6,407
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tiptoes
So all those home wokers connecting to their works Exhange server for their email are buggered.
|
Can the Exchange servers be configured to use another port ?
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 12:35
|
#18
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 31
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
I presume the effect on exchange would not apply if you connect over a vpn tunnel??
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 12:57
|
#19
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by towny
For sure they will, for such is the way of virus writers ... and such is the way of M$, that it prolly won't take long to find the next exploit. 
|
Check out the 4 hotfixes in windows update yesterday
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 12:59
|
#20
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ask not what your country can do for you but what a mess we could have made of your country
Posts: 250
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garyeuph
I presume the effect on exchange would not apply if you connect over a vpn tunnel??
|
AS long as the VPN is set up to use TCP/IP and remember that
VPN isnt "allowed" on residential NTL Services.
Read their AUP.
Also Windows 2K servers on which Exchange server sits needs RPC (Port 135) to function properly so although it can be protected it can t be actually "Closed".
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...n/MS00-066.asp
"Would it be possible to prevent the attack by disabling the RPC service?
It is not practical to disable the RPC service on a Windows 2000 server. RPC is an integral part of the Operating System and many services will not function with RPC disabled."
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 13:00
|
#21
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garyeuph
I presume the effect on exchange would not apply if you connect over a vpn tunnel??
|
Shouldn't think so, because your running the software there and not on your machine
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 13:05
|
#22
|
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,596
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dellwear
Check out the 4 hotfixes in windows update yesterday 
|
Well, don't you know it ... I'm a prophet as well ...
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 13:24
|
#24
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ask not what your country can do for you but what a mess we could have made of your country
Posts: 250
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dellwear
Shouldn't think so, because your running the software there and now on your machine 
|
?
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 13:31
|
#25
|
|
Guest
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dellwear
Check out the 4 hotfixes in windows update yesterday 
|
*cough* post #12 *cough*
|
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 13:36
|
#26
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by homealone
*cough* post #12 *cough* 
|
Sorry Gaz :o
Tiptoes, I've edited my post so it makes sense now
I'll get my coat!
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 13:52
|
#27
|
|
Guest
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dellwear
Sorry Gaz :o
<snip>
|
np - it's these laminate floors, they make everything echo 
It'll be interesting to have a look at my router log when I get home to see how much difference this port blocking has made.
|
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 14:13
|
#28
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 4,499
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Bugga all so far!
Quote:
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:57:50 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.150.191:4035 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:57:56 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.217.203:3622 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:58:02 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.100.109.208:3958 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:58:04 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.224.104:1681 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:58:05 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.100.109.208:3958 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:58:28 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 80.131.136.230:1025 to UDP port 137
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:00:19 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.96.103.92:3651 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:00:53 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.98.39.240:3118 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:00:56 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.98.39.240:3118 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:01:02 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.98.39.240:3118 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:01:12 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.83.164:3412 to TCP port 445
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:01:15 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.83.164:3412 to TCP port 445
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:01:39 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.107.242:3600 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:02:09 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.14.176:3735 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:02:12 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.14.176:3735 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:02:17 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.14.176:3735 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:03:09 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 200.154.72.12:1025 to UDP port 137
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:03:52 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.166.133:4032 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:03:54 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.166.133:4032 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:03:55 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.222.41:3736 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:03:58 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.222.41:3736 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:04:00 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.166.133:4032 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:04:04 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.222.41:3736 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:04:43 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 200.182.64.181:1033 to UDP port 137
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:05:03 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.127.244:4056 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:05:06 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.127.244:4056 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:05:12 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.127.244:4056 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:05:38 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.62.18:3779 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:05:41 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.62.18:3779 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:05:46 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.62.18:3779 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:06:39 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.24.179:3121 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:06:42 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.24.179:3121 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:06:48 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.24.179:3121 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:07:06 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.5.121:1265 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:07:09 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.5.121:1265 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:07:15 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.99.5.121:1265 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:07:53 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.103.221:3415 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:07:55 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.103.221:3415 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:08:01 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.103.221:3415 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:08:50 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.100.153.1:20051 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:08:54 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.100.153.1:20051 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:09:00 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.100.153.1:20051 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:10:05 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.189.91:4123 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:10:08 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.189.91:4123 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:10:14 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.97.189.91:4123 to TCP port 135
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:12:13 GMT+0100 Unrecognized access from 81.98.100.108:4905 to TCP port 135
|
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 15:02
|
#29
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 31
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tiptoes
AS long as the VPN is set up to use TCP/IP and remember that
VPN isnt "allowed" on residential NTL Services.
Read their AUP.
Also Windows 2K servers on which Exchange server sits needs RPC (Port 135) to function properly so although it can be protected it can t be actually "Closed".
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...n/MS00-066.asp
"Would it be possible to prevent the attack by disabling the RPC service?
It is not practical to disable the RPC service on a Windows 2000 server. RPC is an integral part of the Operating System and many services will not function with RPC disabled."
|
THE AUP does allow VPN, they just do not support it!
|
|
|
16-10-2003, 18:45
|
#30
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Farnham
Posts: 503
|
Re: NTL to block port 135
I can't access my pipex dialup mailbox no more...
But it turns out that pipex's mailservers are borked, so it's not due to NTL blocking 135. I didn't think it would be, but it gave me a bad moment.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:06.
|