Five held in grave theft inquiry

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by Damien

What about medication? A lot of medication that keeps people alive (cancer treatments for example) are tested on animals. There was a case a while ago when one of the leaders of these 'animal rights' hooligans was found out to be taking pills tested on animals and when asked she said 'Well, you cant expect me to just die'

No medication I take comes from any labs that test on animals.

These people are sick, they are willing to let humans die,

Sorry, did I miss abit of the article that says so?

then bully and assault those who are trying to save life's. All the time thinking they are morally superior because they are saving an 'animal;. Well as the womens case shows, some tend to think different when its their lifes at stake

There are plenty of ways to test nowadays that doesn't have to inlcude animals. The problem is, it's usually more expensive, which means a bit less profit.....

[Julian]

Let's face it... they are terrorists, let them be tried as such.

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by Julian

Let's face it... they are terrorists, let them be tried as such.

You categorise them with the fanatics that killed 50+ people on the 7th July?

[me283]

Originally Posted by orangebird

You categorise them with the fanatics that killed 50+ people on the 7th July?

Categorise, yes; compare, no.

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by me283

Categorise, yes; compare, no.

?? Julian said

Let's face it... they are terrorists, let them be tried as such.

Try them as terrorists - what, try them like the failed suicide bomber?

[Julian]

Originally Posted by orangebird

You categorise them with the fanatics that killed 50+ people on the 7th July?

You have to admit there are a chilling number of similarities in respect of their preparedness to endanger, threaten and take lives to further their cause OB.

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by Julian

You have to admit there are a chilling number of similarities in respect of their preparedness to endanger, threaten and take lives to further their cause OB.

They threatened. I don't think they're anywhere near like the suicide bombers, but that's my opinion.

[marky]

Terrorism > Use of violence to achieve ends

[me283]

Originally Posted by orangebird

?? Julian said

Try them as terrorists - what, try them like the failed suicide bomber?

They engineered a campaign of terror. Their means and methods were different, but they terrorised a family.

At the end of the day, whether you agree with the cause or not, it's sad that a family has been stopped from going about their lawful everyday lives, by the unlawful actions of others.

[orangebird]

I think it's a shame all round. A shame that the family couldn't do something a little more ethical than breed guinea pigs for testing, a shame that the protesters couldn't have protested in a more civil way, it's a shame some poor old lady has be exhumed in the most disgraceful and undignified way. But it's not a shame the business has closed down at all.

[me283]

Originally Posted by orangebird

I think it's a shame all round. A shame that the family couldn't do something a little more ethical than breed guinea pigs for testing, a shame that the protesters couldn't have protested in a more civil way, it's a shame some poor old lady has be exhumed in the most disgraceful and undignified way. But it's not a shame the business has closed down at all.

That's debatable. However, whilst laws can be enforced, ethics can't. And let's not forget that the lady was just a relative, not even what the protestors would call an "offender".

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by me283

That's debatable. However, whilst laws can be enforced, ethics can't. And let's not forget that the lady was just a relative, not even what the protestors would call an "offender".

No, it's not debatable, it's my opinion. Which I won't change.

Yes, I know she was a relative, thanks. Little point in them digging up a complete and utter stranger really...

[marky]

I know this is off topic but i did a google on orangebird



From 1972 when Walt Disney Worldââ‚ƚ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s Magic Kingdom opened, through the mid 1980ââ‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s, there was a concession stand in Adventureland called the Sunshine Terrace, where guests could get a Citrus Swirl.

The stand still exists, but the animatronic Orange Bird that turned his head and flapped his wings is gone.

WHERE IS IT TODAY?

[me283]

Originally Posted by orangebird

No, it's not debatable, it's my opinion. Which I won't change.

Yes, I know she was a relative, thanks. Little point in them digging up a complete and utter stranger really...

NO point in them digging up anyone. And so what, she was a relative? Do you think that makes it any more acceptable? In your opinion of course.

It is a shame that people who have not broken any laws have had to give in to a group of law-breaking, anarchic extremists. I hope they set up business elsewhere, and make a whole lot more profits than before. Oh, and that's my opinion, so it's not debatable.

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by me283

NO point in them digging up anyone. And so what, she was a relative? Do you think that makes it any more acceptable? In your opinion of course.

No!!!!! I've already said I don't agree with what they did. How many more times to I have to type it out???

It is a shame that people who have not broken any laws have had to give in to a group of law-breaking, anarchic extremists. I hope they set up business elsewhere, and make a whole lot more profits than before.

I guess I know your stance on animal testing then....

Oh, and that's my opinion, so it's not debatable.

I wouldn't be so arrogant to suggest it was.