Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Packet loss - please help.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Computers & IT > Internet Discussion
Reload this Page Packet loss - please help.
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Packet loss - please help.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18-03-2005, 23:39   #1
fragless
Inactive
 
fragless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Darwen
Age: 55
Services: 120mb BB
Posts: 84
fragless is on a distinguished roadfragless is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Packet loss - please help.
Hi,

if this is in the wrong section, sorry!

I have had problems with a server at nac.net for the last 3 days, the following images are taken from pingplotter, and show packet loss on and off over the day...

http://www.supportm.com/nac_pl/day3/thor.ntl-1.png
http://www.supportm.com/nac_pl/day3/thor.ntl-2.png
http://www.supportm.com/nac_pl/day3/thor.BY-3..jpg

first 2 are from My connection ntl 3mb BB, the 3rd is from a BY user on 2mb.
If some of you could test the following IP 66.246.72.94
And let me know if you also experience packet loss to the IP, now its on and off so a quick trace may not show any pl at all.

Thank you
Mark
fragless is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 19-03-2005, 00:04   #2
timewarrior2001
Guest
 
Location: Teesside
Services: Evilness
Posts: n/a
Re: Packet loss - please help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fragless
Hi,

if this is in the wrong section, sorry!

I have had problems with a server at nac.net for the last 3 days, the following images are taken from pingplotter, and show packet loss on and off over the day...

http://www.supportm.com/nac_pl/day3/thor.ntl-1.png
http://www.supportm.com/nac_pl/day3/thor.ntl-2.png
http://www.supportm.com/nac_pl/day3/thor.BY-3..jpg

first 2 are from My connection ntl 3mb BB, the 3rd is from a BY user on 2mb.
If some of you could test the following IP 66.246.72.94
And let me know if you also experience packet loss to the IP, now its on and off so a quick trace may not show any pl at all.

Thank you
Mark

I dont **** about with fancy progs, but all I could come up with was:-

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>ping /t 66.246.72.94

Pinging 66.246.72.94 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55


Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Soho Router [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 12 ms 9 ms 10.141.63.254
3 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms midd-t2cam1-a-v107.inet.ntl.com [213.106.238.41]

4 11 ms 16 ms 11 ms midd-t2core-a-ge-wan64.inet.ntl.com [213.106.237
.45]
5 12 ms 14 ms 15 ms lee-bb-a-so-130-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.89]
6 17 ms 17 ms 25 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]

7 18 ms 17 ms 26 ms pop-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.78]
8 38 ms 19 ms 22 ms tele-ic-2-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.86]

9 19 ms 21 ms 20 ms ntl-gw.telecomplete.net [213.160.97.41]
10 20 ms 17 ms 18 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
11 20 ms 19 ms 17 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
12 135 ms 86 ms 86 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
13 89 ms 85 ms 87 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2005, 01:10   #3
carlingman
Inactive
 
carlingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South
Posts: 1,520
carlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appeal
carlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appeal
Re: Packet loss - please help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by timewarrior2001
I dont **** about with fancy progs, but all I could come up with was:-

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>ping /t 66.246.72.94

Pinging 66.246.72.94 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55


Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Soho Router [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 12 ms 9 ms 10.141.63.254
3 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms midd-t2cam1-a-v107.inet.ntl.com [213.106.238.41]

4 11 ms 16 ms 11 ms midd-t2core-a-ge-wan64.inet.ntl.com [213.106.237
.45]
5 12 ms 14 ms 15 ms lee-bb-a-so-130-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.89]
6 17 ms 17 ms 25 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]

7 18 ms 17 ms 26 ms pop-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.78]
8 38 ms 19 ms 22 ms tele-ic-2-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.86]

9 19 ms 21 ms 20 ms ntl-gw.telecomplete.net [213.160.97.41]
10 20 ms 17 ms 18 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
11 20 ms 19 ms 17 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
12 135 ms 86 ms 86 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
13 89 ms 85 ms 87 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94
Me dont **** around with any fancy ping plotters but a simple tracert as I have posted below shows the problem to increase on the oct.nac.net not with NTL or Pipex in my case on a 512k connection.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 24 ms 23 ms 25 ms 81-86-***-*.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.***.*]
2 24 ms 25 ms 23 ms eth3-1.cr1.uk5.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.41]

3 28 ms 23 ms 24 ms ge-1-2-0.cr1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.9
7]
4 26 ms 25 ms 25 ms xpe1.thn.telecomplete.net [217.79.160.58]
5 25 ms 25 ms 28 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
6 24 ms 25 ms 25 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
7 93 ms 96 ms 94 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
8 95 ms 95 ms 109 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms 81-86-***-*.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.***.*]
2 23 ms 24 ms 25 ms eth3-1.cr1.uk5.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.41]

3 25 ms 27 ms 24 ms ge-1-2-0.cr1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.9
7]
4 24 ms 26 ms 26 ms xpe1.thn.telecomplete.net [217.79.160.58]
5 31 ms 24 ms 24 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
6 26 ms 27 ms 30 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
7 99 ms 164 ms 144 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
8 97 ms 97 ms 95 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.
carlingman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11.

Contact Us - Service Status - Cable Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

Server: lithium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum
Copyright © 2026 Cable Forum Hosted On Hetzner Cloud