Now the shoe is on the other foot....
13-01-2005, 13:37
|
#2
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 42
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,489
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Sweet... now remind me about political correctness...
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 13:44
|
#3
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 13:45
|
#4
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,182
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
A LONG way to go before we get that.....
__________________
Heavy Is The Crown
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:03
|
#5
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
*wanders off to find something worth-wile reading.
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:04
|
#6
|
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,607
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Ridiculous. They should not be banned from waving flags, and nor should anyone else. It's all very well seeing this as equality at last, but if it ultimately serves to further justify the banning of the Union flag, or St George's cross, then what have we gained in the end?
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:07
|
#7
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 42
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,489
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris T
Ridiculous. They should not be banned from waving flags, and nor should anyone else. It's all very well seeing this as equality at last, but if it ultimately serves to further justify the banning of the Union flag, or St George's cross, then what have we gained in the end?
|
I disagree. Everyone should be allowed to wave their flags or no-one should.
Fact is they have CHOSEN, or their parents have, to live in BRITAIN- so they should abide by the customs there and not impose their lifestyle on the inhabitants. When in Rome...
I have no problem with asylum seekers or immigrants if they INTEGRATE and CONTRIBUTE. If they upset the harmony in the country and sponge off benefits they can sod off IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:12
|
#8
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
Fact is they have CHOSEN, or their parents have, to live in BRITAIN- so they should abide by the customs there and not impose their lifestyle on the inhabitants. When in Rome...
|
What on earth has that got do do with people celebrating and waving a flag? People will be banning flags at mardi gra next. Are people in this country really this petty?
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:14
|
#9
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 42
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,489
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dellwear
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
Fact is they have CHOSEN, or their parents have, to live in BRITAIN- so they should abide by the customs there and not impose their lifestyle on the inhabitants. When in Rome...
|
What on earth has that got do do with people celebrating and waving a flag? People will be banning flags at mardi gra next. Are people in this country really this petty? |
Yeah but it's usually them that stop US celebrating things that we have for years.
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:21
|
#10
|
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,607
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
I disagree. Everyone should be allowed to wave their flags or no-one should.
|
If you think that everyone should be allowed to wave their flags or no-one should, then you are not disagreeing with me. That is what I meant when I said:
Quote:
|
They should not be banned from waving flags, and nor should anyone else.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
Fact is they have CHOSEN, or their parents have, to live in BRITAIN- so they should abide by the customs there and not impose their lifestyle on the inhabitants. When in Rome...
|
Right. So now I live in Scotland, do you think I should not be allowed to wear an England football shirt or fly St George's flag should I want to? Or that a Scot living in London should not be allowed to wear a kilt in Oxford Street on St Andrew's Day?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
I have no problem with asylum seekers or immigrants if they INTEGRATE and CONTRIBUTE. If they upset the harmony in the country and sponge off benefits they can sod off IMO.
|
The overwhelming majority of 'immigrants' and their descendants have done just that. Or are you claiming that the majority of the 3.6 million people in this country who now live here but were born outside the EU are 'spongers'?
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:25
|
#11
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,064
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
Yeah but it's usually them that stop US celebrating things that we have for years.
|
When were you ever stopped from celebrating anything? 
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:29
|
#12
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 42
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,489
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
I disagree. Everyone should be allowed to wave their flags or no-one should.
|
If you think that everyone should be allowed to wave their flags or no-one should, then you are not disagreeing with me. That is what I meant when I said:
Quote:
|
They should not be banned from waving flags, and nor should anyone else.
|
|
I was referring to them using it as an excuse to ban OUR flag.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
Fact is they have CHOSEN, or their parents have, to live in BRITAIN- so they should abide by the customs there and not impose their lifestyle on the inhabitants. When in Rome...
|
Right. So now I live in Scotland, do you think I should not be allowed to wear an England football shirt or fly St George's flag should I want to? Or that a Scot living in London should not be allowed to wear a kilt in Oxford Street on St Andrew's Day?
|
slightly different. Look in places like Oldham, Burnley, etc, some parts they've even reflected the ethnic mix by having signs in Urdu. In some parts of England you can't fly the St Georges flag without being told to take it down because it's either "racist" or "inciting racial hatred". I'm not against people flying flags, it's slightly different to alienating the "natives" by demanding their lifestyle, laws, customs are changed. Slightly different to wearing a football shirt, kilt or waving a flag.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
I have no problem with asylum seekers or immigrants if they INTEGRATE and CONTRIBUTE. If they upset the harmony in the country and sponge off benefits they can sod off IMO.
|
The overwhelming majority of 'immigrants' and their descendants have done just that. Or are you claiming that the majority of the 3.6 million people in this country who now live here but were born outside the EU are 'spongers'?
|
Done what, integrated or sponged? Immigrants from Eastern europe 1940s-50s worked hard for the country, as did later immigrants from the Commonwealth eg Asia, Africa, Caribbean. Same can be said for the Turkish "Gastarbeiters" who helped rebuild Germany after WWII.
Immigration is not a problem, it's the people that abuse the immigration and benefit system I have a problem with.
I'm not anti-immigration and I'm not racist. I just think people should be fair and treat others as equals with the right to their opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:30
|
#13
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London way
Age: 50
Services: Sarcasm
Posts: 8,376
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris T
Or that a Scot living in London should not be allowed to wear a kilt in Oxford Street on St Andrew's Day?
|
Personally, I don't think they should be allowed to wear kilts. Ever. A sudden gust of wind and it could scar me for life 
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:33
|
#14
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LCFC Blue Army!
Services: V + HD
V Telephone
V Cable 20MB
Posts: 2,559
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey
Personally, I don't think they should be allowed to wear kilts. Ever. A sudden gust of wind and it could scar me for life |
Quote:
|
slightly different. Look in places like Oldham, Burnley, etc, some parts they've even reflected the ethnic mix by having signs in Urdu. In some parts of England you can't fly the St Georges flag without being told to take it down because it's either "racist" or "inciting racial hatred". I'm not against people flying flags, it's slightly different to alienating the "natives" by demanding their lifestyle, laws, customs are changed. Slightly different to wearing a football shirt, kilt or waving a flag.
|
Agree and well put. 
|
|
|
|
|
13-01-2005, 14:35
|
#15
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 51
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,211
|
Re: Now the shoe is on the other foot....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey
Personally, I don't think they should be allowed to wear kilts. Ever. A sudden gust of wind and it could scar me for life |
Depends which way you're facing  
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:55.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
