You are here: Home | Forum | SNP: Two Murrells, one motorhome and a shed-load of missing cash
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
Re: SNP: Two Murrells, one motorhome and a shed-load of missing cash
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashville
How she is free beats me
i hope the police are working on that
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
I think it’s offered very broadly when serious criminal charges are involved. There may be a mechanism for clawing some of it back later, possibly by putting a charge on assets.
---------- Post added at 11:37 ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
It started shortly after they got married.
Shortly after he learned he’d have to get his thrills elsewhere …
Famously, the Scottish Greens co-leader Ross Greer MSP took to social media to vouch for the character of Peter Murrell for getting him a pay rise when he worked there.
It’s unclear under what authority this pay rise was made as Yes Scotland were a separate legal entity from the SNP.
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,488
Re: SNP: Two Murrells, one motorhome and a shed-load of missing cash
David Davis has just used parliamentary privilege to say some very uncomfortable things about Nicola Sturgeon. It’s well worth watching the video of his speech which he has shared on Xitter, but bear in mind that he can say things in the chamber that the rest of us can’t repeat here without risk of being sued by Nippy (although the chances of that are of course extremely slim).
It is legally permissible to report whatever is said in parliament, and such reports are protected by legal privilege as long as they’re fair and accurate.
Though her complaint that he’s hiding ‘like a coward’ behind the legal privilege of speaking in Westminster is a bit rich coming from someone who used the legal privilege of saying ‘no comment’ for several hours whilst being questioned by Polis Scotland.
---------- Post added at 17:46 ---------- Previous post was at 17:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry
I can't watch it because I'm not a registered user of x.
---------- Post added at 17:44 ---------- Previous post was at 17:43 ----------
Didn’t realise they restricted videos to those logged in. Nice Youtube find though.
Join CF
You are here: 
