President Trump 2.0

[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by thenry

It's bloody law enforcement. If you want to use a potential weapon, a vehicle in this case to escape apprehension both the law enforcement and escapee are under threat. Both used force to deal with the situation. I don't understand this grievance for the driver of the vehicle. Obey instructions from those in positions of power or you'll feel each others power.

The driver was immature. An adult would deal with the situation.

That's your reputation shot - or what was left of it.

---------- Post added at 16:33 ---------- Previous post was at 16:32 ----------

Originally Posted by Carth

EU will roll over . . . . as will NATO

... and Starmer will have to squirm.

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Hugh

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...g-minneapolis/



He was in so much danger he kept filming on his phone whilst he shot the driver…

The car was reversing AND turning. That brought him into the front.
Pictures
Snapshot_20260110_162530.jpg
Snapshot_20260110_162554.jpg
Snapshot_20260110_162711.jpg
Was he moving from right to left or was the car moving from left to right? Little sign of him moving as he is facing forwards all the time.
Phone was in his left hand, gun was on his right. He started filming long before then.

[thenry]

Why is the car black in your images but the images on SkyNews show the vehicle as burgundy

https://youtube.com/shorts/s5rndXDaX_Q

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

What was preventing the shooter from deftly stepping to his right?

Too close and facing forwards. Not enough time to do anything. He would have to turn right and then move. He appears to have been stationary and not expecting her to move forward. He did move slightly or was nudged aside, with the car appearing to hit his left leg(foot off the ground). Only now, the front wheels are starting to turn right.
Snapshot_20260110_164140.jpg

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by thenry

Why is the car black in your images but the images on SkyNews show the vehicle as burgundy

https://youtube.com/shorts/s5rndXDaX_Q

Different angle and camera. My caps do show a dark burgundy. The video is from the BBC broadcast.

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by noel43

When vehicle moved of, wheels turned to right, no danger to the murderer

At the time he had to make a decision, the wheels were pointing straight ahead. Not that he would've seen them as he was too close and watching the actions of the driver.
Even at the point of the 1st shot, the wheels were only starting to turn right.
Snapshot_20260110_170009.jpg
See his left foot off the ground from his leg being hit.

[Sirius]

When ever i here that Trump has been mouthing off again it reminds me of this https://youtu.be/nYZ4IoyztIw?t=73

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by nomadking

At the time he had to make a decision, the wheels were pointing straight ahead. Not that he would've seen them as he was too close and watching the actions of the driver.
Even at the point of the 1st shot, the wheels were only starting to turn right.
Attachment 31595
See his left foot off the ground from his leg being hit.

However if you watch the other videos, the murderer was clearly in no danger at all. His first shot was to the dark right of the windshield. Showing he was at the corner of the vehicle and his own mobile phone footage shows where he was.

But as per the law enforcement rules they should not stand in front of a moving or potentially moving vehicle. You also hear the shots as she moved off to the right.

[jem]

Originally Posted by nomadking

At the time he had to make a decision, the wheels were pointing straight ahead. Not that he would've seen them as he was too close and watching the actions of the driver.
Even at the point of the 1st shot, the wheels were only starting to turn right.
Attachment 31595
See his left foot off the ground from his leg being hit.

Eh no, from the picture you provided, his left foot is not ‘off the ground’, if anything it would have been his right leg, judging from the angle. There is nothing, absolutely nothing from the frame you have posted that suggests that the ICE agent’s life was in imminent danger. The car is moving away from him.

I think it is fairly obvious that a poorly trained person, thrust in to a position because of the current US regime are desperate to people to carry out the Fuhrer's, sorry, President’s, wishes, regardless.

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by nomadking

Independent investigation by the Democratic Minneapolis Mayor? Yeah right.
[

Independent investigation by the FBI under its current leadership who were calling the murder victim names before she was cold, yeah right

Originally Posted by Stephen

However if you watch the other videos, the murderer was clearly in no danger at all. His first shot was to the dark right of the windshield. Showing he was at the corner of the vehicle and his own mobile phone footage shows where he was.

But as per the law enforcement rules they should not stand in front of a moving or potentially moving vehicle. You also hear the shots as she moved off to the right.

Also in the video you don't hear him cry out in surprise or pain at the car hitting him, we do him him cursing the lady he just shot in the face though however...

It was moving at what ? 2 mph ?
Doesnt exactly seem "life threatening".

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Stephen

However if you watch the other videos, the murderer was clearly in no danger at all. His first shot was to the dark right of the windshield. Showing he was at the corner of the vehicle and his own mobile phone footage shows where he was.

But as per the law enforcement rules they should not stand in front of a moving or potentially moving vehicle. You also hear the shots as she moved off to the right.

He didn't stand in front. As shown by the set of 3 pictures I posted. She reversed left hand down. That brought him, the fences, trees, and building across the road into view. Are you suggesting the fences etc moved?
She would've been turning the steering to the right to straighten up, after steering left.

Originally Posted by nomadking

Independent investigation by the Democratic Minneapolis Mayor? Yeah right.
Attachment 31589
When he reached for his gun, wheels aimed straight ahead and he's in front of the vehicle.
A few frames on.
Attachment 31590
Vehicle has moved forwards and wheels still straight ahead.
Case closed.

The first picture, he has his hand on this gun. The 2nd picture has the gun partially out of the holster. The set of two pictures proves she was steering straight and moving straight ahead.The wheel trim is visible in both.

---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ----------

Originally Posted by Paul

It was moving at what ? 2 mph ?
Doesnt exactly seem "life threatening".

In the olden days, somebody was killed when the vehicle was moving at 4mph(on back of Walkers crisp packet from the 1970s).
Why does it have to be life-threatening? It is clear the car was pointing in his direction and moving forward at the time of drawing his gun. Even being gently knocked to the ground can be fatal.

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by nomadking

He didn't stand in front. As shown by the set of 3 pictures I posted. She reversed left hand down. That brought him, the fences, trees, and building across the road into view. Are you suggesting the fences etc moved?
She would've been turning the steering to the right to straighten up, after steering left.

The first picture, he has his hand on this gun. The 2nd picture has the gun partially out of the holster. The set of two pictures proves she was steering straight and moving straight ahead.The wheel trim is visible in both.

---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ----------


In the olden days, somebody was killed when the vehicle was moving at 4mph(on back of Walkers crisp packet from the 1970s).
Why does it have to be life-threatening? It is clear the car was pointing in his direction and moving forward at the time of drawing his gun. Even being gently knocked to the ground can be fatal.

She literally reversed, turned the wheel to the right and moved. That is also clear to see from the murderers own phone footage.

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by jem

Eh no, from the picture you provided, his left foot is not ‘off the ground’, if anything it would have been his right leg, judging from the angle. There is nothing, absolutely nothing from the frame you have posted that suggests that the ICE agent’s life was in imminent danger. The car is moving away from him.

I think it is fairly obvious that a poorly trained person, thrust in to a position because of the current US regime are desperate to people to carry out the Fuhrer's, sorry, President’s, wishes, regardless.

Right or left leg, he was still hit.
Shows point of contact.
Snapshot_20260110_220624.jpg
and pushed aside.
Snapshot_20260110_220759.jpg
As the car moved on, he seem to do a slight hobble.
NOT about what happened to him, but what COULD'VE happened to him. He could've have been dragged by the car and required 33 stitches, as had happened to him before.

Ross is an Iraq War veteran who has served for nearly two decades in the Border Patrol and ICE, according to records. He has been a deportation officer since 2015.
He was seriously injured last summer when he was dragged by the car of a fleeing illegal immigrant sex offender whom he shot with a stun gun while trying to arrest him.
The previous incident in which took place in Bloomington, Minnesota and left Ross with injuries that required 33 stitches.

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Independent investigation by the FBI under its current leadership who were calling the murder victim names before she was cold, yeah right



Also in the video you don't hear him cry out in surprise or pain at the car hitting him, we do him him cursing the lady he just shot in the face though however...

Where does it say it was him "cursing" anybody? You curse if you had been injured or were forced to shoot somebody when you wouldn't have wanted to.
The women were there to deliberately disrupt ICE and block the roads. That is according to her wife.
Undeniable that the car was driven towards him. Why wouldn't you call somebody who did that all sorts of names?
Only on closer and detailed examination, might it appear that she might've unintentionally driven towards him. That takes time to establish.