Starmer’s chronicles

Originally Posted by Russ

Get over it, you lost, move on etc

Indeed, you should try it sometime.

---------- Post added at 22:01 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ----------

Originally Posted by papa smurf

you been sniffing the carpet?

Hes on something, thats for sure.

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Russ

Get over it, you lost, move on etc

Nailed it!

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

Enough about your past posting prowess this isn't all about you

---------- Post added at 19:55 ---------- Previous post was at 19:53 ----------



how do you arrive at that conclusion ? i only pointed out the lies that labour told

and before anyone starts -this thread isn't about Boris bloody Johnson

You are whinging about Labour not paying so, again, are you happy to stump up the cash to pay for this?

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by ianch99

You are whinging about Labour not paying so, again, are you happy to stump up the cash to pay for this?

Scrap the triple lock to pay for it. Seems fair enough to me, nobody could complain

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by ianch99

You are whinging about Labour not paying so, again, are you happy to stump up the cash to pay for this?

once again
how do you arrive at that conclusion ? i only pointed out the lies that labour told

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

once again
how do you arrive at that conclusion ? i only pointed out the lies that labour told

He's asking you a basic yes or no question. He's not concluding anything.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

He's asking you a basic yes or no question. He's not concluding anything.

i posted an article from the press, i did not post an opinion about the decision not to pay, at this time i do not have an opinion other than it's wrong to lie to the elderly in order to garner their votes, these women were given false hope and that is wrong in my book.

[Kursk]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

i posted an article from the press, i did not post an opinion about the decision not to pay, at this time i do not have an opinion other than it's wrong to lie to the elderly in order to garner their votes, these women were given false hope and that is wrong in my book.

You are absolutely right papa.

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

i posted an article from the press, i did not post an opinion about the decision not to pay, at this time i do not have an opinion other than it's wrong to lie to the elderly in order to garner their votes, these women were given false hope and that is wrong in my book.

So Starmer should pay then?

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Mr K

Scrap the triple lock to pay for it. Seems fair enough to me, nobody could complain

let me take this opportunity to thank you for paying your taxes and funding my state pension and by extension my boating lifestyle, as to the triple lock i can't see it lasting under this shower, i retired at 61 with no help from the state so not really worried .

---------- Post added at 10:02 ---------- Previous post was at 10:00 ----------

Originally Posted by ianch99

So Starmer should pay then?

He should stop lying to people ,as i have said previously i have no opinion on the payment at this time

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

He should stop lying to people ,as i have said previously i have no opinion on the payment at this time

So basically you just like whingeing about Labour then.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by ianch99

So basically you just like whingeing about Labour then.

posting a press release about MP's lying is not whinging it's pointing out the facts as published.

Originally Posted by papa smurf

i posted an article from the press, i did not post an opinion about the decision not to pay, at this time i do not have an opinion other than it's wrong to lie to the elderly in order to garner their votes, these women were given false hope and that is wrong in my book.

Totally agree with you…

On that point…

- The Conservative Party suspended the triple lock in 2021, breaking a Manifesto pledge
- The Conservatives broke a manifesto commitment to fix the social care crisis, and successive Conservative Governments promised to publish a plan to improve social care - Alzheimers UK found that families are being forced to shoulder 63% of the cost of dementia care (equivalent to £51,000 a year on average)
- Boris Johnson pledged in 2019 that no-one would have to sell their house to pay for social care under a Conservative government. In 2020, more than 17,000 pensioners were forced to sell their homes to pay for social care (reported in the Daily Mail).

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Hugh

Totally agree with you…

On that point…

- The Conservative Party suspended the triple lock in 2021, breaking a Manifesto pledge
- The Conservatives broke a manifesto commitment to fix the social care crisis, and successive Conservative Governments promised to publish a plan to improve social care - Alzheimers UK found that families are being forced to shoulder 63% of the cost of dementia care (equivalent to £51,000 a year on average)
- Boris Johnson pledged in 2019 that no-one would have to sell their house to pay for social care under a Conservative government. In 2020, more than 17,000 pensioners were forced to sell their homes to pay for social care (reported in the Daily Mail).

we know all that, Boris is no longer in politics, and this thread isn't about Boris Johnson its about Stammers chronicles ,bojo is gone get over it.

---------- Post added at 12:12 ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 ----------

Anyhoo in a blow to the Government

UK interest rates held at 4.75%

UK interest rates will remain at 4.75% until at least next February after the Bank of England voted to hold borrowing costs.

In its final meeting of the year, the Bank's rate-setting committee decided against further cuts after recent figures showed an increase in both inflation and wage growth.

Bank governor Andrew Bailey has previously indicated that while rates will fall further - after two cuts this year - the decline would be gradual.

The Bank will next meet at the beginning of February when it will also give an update of its forecasts for the British economy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd75yq1zlzqo

Originally Posted by papa smurf

once again
how do you arrive at that conclusion ?

It was a question, not a conclusion.

Originally Posted by ianch99

So Starmer should pay then?

No.

Originally Posted by ianch99

So basically you just like whingeing about Labour then.

You're making it up again.
Still, that does apply to some here, across different parties.