| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 10:00 | #226 |  
	| The Dark Satanic Mills 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: floating in the ether 
					Posts: 13,234
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RichardCoulter  Of course you can.  If her campaign is successful in persuading our elected representatives that a ban is appropriate then they will pass a law banning U16's from having an adult mobile smartphone.
 The only phones they will be able to have will be a child smartphone or a basic phone and probably not at school.
 |  What about Tablets?
 
What about PC’s?
		 
				__________________The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 14:02 | #227 |  
	| Trollsplatter 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: North of Watford Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests 
					Posts: 38,220
				 | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RichardCoulter  Of course you can.  If her campaign is successful in persuading our elected representatives that a ban is appropriate then they will pass a law banning U16's from having an adult mobile smartphone.
 The only phones they will be able to have will be a child smartphone or a basic phone and probably not at school.
 |  Her campaign will not be successful because it is totally unworkable for all the other reasons everyone else here has patiently explained to you.  You need to stop obsessing over this and move on - you haven’t found a new folk hero, you’ve found a parent speaking out of grief.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 14:30 | #228 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 10,767
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Chris  Her campaign will not be successful because it is totally unworkable for all the other reasons everyone else here has patiently explained to you.  You need to stop obsessing over this and move on - you haven’t found a new folk hero, you’ve found a parent speaking out of grief.
 |  I'm not obsessed about the issue, mainly because it won't affect me one way or the other.
 
I've just updated the thread with the latest news and tried to respond to various points that have been (politely) made.
 
If they decide to pass legislation the question as to what they would do with tablets & PC's is a good one.  
 
As for enforceability, I doubt that would come into it.  Lots of laws have been passed where they aren't particularly enforceable and don't come to light until something goes wrong.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 14:36 | #229 |  
	| laeva recumbens anguis Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 68 Services: Premiere Collection 
					Posts: 43,790
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			If a law can’t be adequately enforced, it’s not fit for purpose, and therefore only electioneering.
		 
				__________________Thank you for calling the Abyss.
 If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void,  or press 2 to begin your stare.
 If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 14:44 | #230 |  
	| The Invisible Woman Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton. Age: 73 Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo 
					Posts: 40,355
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hugh  If a law can’t be adequately enforced, it’s not fit for purpose, and therefore only electioneering. |    
				__________________Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 14:46 | #231 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 10,767
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hugh  If a law can’t be adequately enforced, it’s not fit for purpose, and therefore only electioneering. |  I'm not sure that the Tories would do this for electioneering purposes.  A lot of Tories don't like state involvement of citizens lives.
 
Lots of laws aren't fit for purpose and/or cannot easily be enforced, bur it doesn't stop Parliament from passing them.
 
MP's could choose to amend the Online Safety Act to ban U16's from having an adult smartphone and some parents could decide to break the law and still allow them to have one.
 
In practice it's unlikely that they would be caught, particularly if phones are banned in schools.  Sure, some will be caught if they decide to utilise spot checks, but I imagine that most will be caught when something goes wrong eg murder, child sex abuse and it's found that the child had access to social media.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 14:46 | #232 |  
	| Woke and proud ! 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife 
					Posts: 9,950
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hugh  If a law can’t be adequately enforced, it’s not fit for purpose, and therefore only electioneering. |  A bit like the fox hunting law then.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 15:53 | #233 |  
	| Dr Pepper Addict Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Nottingham Age: 62 Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP 
					Posts: 30,012
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			Whats an "adult" smart phone ?
		 
				__________________  Baby, I was born this way. |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 16:44 | #234 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Up North - Where It's Grim Age: 58 
					Posts: 2,500
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			If we go with the let's ban people from doing things then maybe we should ban people from driving until they are 25 as the 17 to 24 age group is statistically over-represented in reported road accidents in comparison with older car drivers aged 25 and above.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 17:00 | #235 |  
	| Woke and proud ! 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife 
					Posts: 9,950
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth  If we go with the let's ban people from doing things then maybe we should ban people from driving until they are 25 as the 17 to 24 age group is statistically over-represented in reported road accidents in comparison with older car drivers aged 25 and above. |  Given that insurance for those in that age group can be many thousands now. They are effectively banned unless they (or Mummy/Daddy) are rich. 
 
Let's also ban :-  soap operasReality tvAny programmes about housing or cookingPiers MorganThose motorised scooter thingsDog/cat shit irresponsible ownersGerman cars
 
				 Last edited by Mr K; 12-02-2024 at 17:03.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 17:12 | #236 |  
	| The Dark Satanic Mills 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: floating in the ether 
					Posts: 13,234
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mr K  Given that insurance for those in that age group can be many thousands now. They are effectively banned unless they (or Mummy/Daddy) are rich.  
Let's also ban :-  soap operasReality tvAny programmes about housing or cookingPiers MorganThose motorised scooter thingsDog/cat shit irresponsible ownersGerman cars
 |  we could cut the murder and violent crime rate by 90%, if we just jailed the male population from the age of 18-80.
 
Sensible policies for a sensible Britain.
		 
				__________________The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 17:38 | #237 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 10,767
				      | 
				 Re: Online Safety Bill 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Paul  Whats an "adult" smart phone ? |  This refers to a bog standard smartphone ie not a child phone. Child phones generally refer to basic phones or smartphones that are specially designed or modified for use by children.
 
Things could be worse, a village in France has just banned everyone from scrolling on their phone in public and are offering 'dumb' phones to children under 15   https://www.scottishlegal.com/articl...dian%20reports .
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 18:05 | #238 |  
	| Grumpy Fecker 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Warrington Age: 65 Services: Every Weekend 
					Posts: 16,998
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Chris  Her campaign will not be successful because it is totally unworkable for all the other reasons everyone else here has patiently explained to you.  You need to stop obsessing over this and move on - you haven’t found a new folk hero, you’ve found a parent speaking out of grief. |  We should call it "The world according to Richard daily broadcast"    
				__________________So you all voted for Labour and now you are shocked they resort to stabbing the pensioners and disabled in the back. Shame on you.
 
 Online Safety Bill, The scammers new target.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 18:16 | #239 |  
	| Do I care what you think 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Cardiff South Wales Age: 75 Services: V6 ,Virgin L. Phone Broadband.sky go Netflix 
					Posts: 5,193
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Paul  Whats an "adult" smart phone ? |  My guess any smartphone,  would need to have dumb phones    
				__________________No point in being pessimistic. You know it won`t work.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-02-2024, 18:18 | #240 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 10,767
				      | 
				
				Re: Online Safety Bill
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sirius  We should call it "The world according to Richard daily broadcast"   |  It's not the world according to me at all.  You're not obliged to read this thread if you don't want to do so, in fact you are able to put me on ignore completely if you so wish. 
 ---------- Post added at 17:18 ---------- Previous post was at 17:16 ----------
 
 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Itshim  My guess any smartphone,  would need to have dumb phones   |  No, they can have child friendly smartphones if parents are happy with this.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:34. |