Boris misled just about everyone. - Page 9

denphone · 16-06-2023, 19:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Stop the whataboutery nonsense. We’re talking about consistency. How do Blair’s lies compare with Boris Johnson’s?

You guys don’t want to discuss it because you know I’m right and you don’t want to be challenged on the perversity of your arguments.

You hate him, I get that. But where is the justice?

I am fully aware that the Committee was Conservative dominated. Your point is…? We all know that there are remainers and Boris haters within his own party.

Blairs War lies are for another thread if you feel so strongly about it as Johnson has been proven to be a liar time and time again and its only the partisan Boris Johnson apologist's who will defend him despite the clear evidence for all to see even if it means they follow him off the top of a cliff.

Ms NTL · 16-06-2023, 19:29

God spoke

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...t-work-me.html

**Chris** · 16-06-2023, 19:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Nobody is answering the real point, which is consistency and justice.

Of course, no-one on this forum wants to discuss that, do they?

Never mind, the avoidance or silence says it all.

The committee assessed the evidence put before it and issued its report. That’s all there is to it. All you’re doing is trying to make everyone look away to distract them from how truly awful your man is. The fact nobody wants to play with you should give you a hint about how transparently ridiculous you’re being.

OLD BOY · 16-06-2023, 19:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone

Blairs War lies are for another thread if you feel so strongly about it as Johnson has been proven to be a liar time and time again and its only the partisan Boris Johnson apologist's who will defend him despite the clear evidence for all to see even if it means they follow him off the top of a cliff.

Typical reluctance to talk about the actual point. The comparison is legitimate. There is no justice here and naturally you don't want to discuss that, because you can't justify your attitude against Johnson when I compare the much more serious case against Blair.

Just let your brain do the thinking, Den, and put your emotion to one side.

Can you do that? Can anyone on here do that?

---------- Post added at 18:59 ---------- Previous post was at 18:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

The committee assessed the evidence put before it and issued its report. That’s all there is to it. All you’re doing is trying to make everyone look away to distract them from how truly awful your man is. The fact nobody wants to play with you should give you a hint about how transparently ridiculous you’re being.

Chris, I don't care. I've told you why. This is a gross over-reaction, and Blair's treatment proves that.

Itshim · 16-06-2023, 20:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

The committee assessed the evidence put before it and issued its report. That’s all there is to it. All you’re doing is trying to make everyone look away to distract them from how truly awful your man is. The fact nobody wants to play with you should give you a hint about how transparently ridiculous you’re being.

I was just pointing out the inconsistency of the way people view things. Blair and Bush went to war on lies , Boris has cake in his place of work and all hell breaks out , Starmer eats fish and chips drinks beer away from his, nothing wrong . As if it is going to be the same rules for every one. Just for reference I like Boris , he seems get things done , whether you agree or not but trust him to tell the truth , would need to fact check it. Thinking about it not so different from every other MP , banker or any supermarket owner.

in other words ,check everything believe no one.

TheDaddy · 16-06-2023, 20:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Nobody is answering the real point, which is consistency and justice.

Of course, no-one on this forum wants to discuss that, do they?

Never mind, the avoidance or silence says it all.

What are you on about you damp quilt, the vast majority of this country and this forum I'd wager would be delighted to see Blair in The Hague maybe they'd even like it more than never seeing or hearing from bozo again

jfman · 16-06-2023, 20:23

Justice

Pierre · 16-06-2023, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

What are you on about you damp quilt, the vast majority of this country and this forum I'd wager would be delighted to see Blair in The Hague maybe they'd even like it more than never seeing or hearing from bozo again

Correct, with Campbell along side him.

**Chris** · 16-06-2023, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Chris, I don't care. I've told you why. This is a gross over-reaction, and Blair's treatment proves that.

You so obviously do, which is why you’ve spent the last 36 hours setting up enough straw men for a re-make of Worzel Gummidge.

OLD BOY · 16-06-2023, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

What are you on about you damp quilt, the vast majority of this country and this forum I'd wager would be delighted to see Blair in The Hague maybe they'd even like it more than never seeing or hearing from bozo again

Maybe, but funny how you can’t bring yourself to address the issue I’m talking about, consistency.

You don’t have an answer, do you?

GrimUpNorth · 16-06-2023, 21:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Nobody is answering the real point, which is consistency and justice.

Of course, no-one on this forum wants to discuss that, do they?

Never mind, the avoidance or silence says it all.

I'll answer the question. I think Tony Blair was a slimeball too. I never voted for the party when he was leader and was glad when he was no more. If he mislead parliament then he should have been taken to task over it.

You should ask your MP why he didn't campaign for Tony to be hauled over the coals but then he'd maybe have to face up to not being outspoken about Boris so he'd be guilty of inconsistency which for you would never do.

jfman · 16-06-2023, 21:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Maybe, but funny how you can’t bring yourself to address the issue I’m talking about, consistency.

You don’t have an answer, do you?

So nobody should ever be held accountable because someone else at some different point in time wasn’t held accountable for doing something entirely different?

**Hugh** · 16-06-2023, 21:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Maybe, but funny how you can’t bring yourself to address the issue I’m talking about, consistency.

You don’t have an answer, do you?

TheDaddy · 16-06-2023, 22:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Maybe, but funny how you can’t bring yourself to address the issue I’m talking about, consistency.

You don’t have an answer, do you?

Really, I thought it was about justice or a hate campaign or being spiteful, truth is you're just a bit of a snowflake who thinks poor bozo has been treated terribly unfairly and most of the rest of us think it couldn't have happened to a nicer fella

Sephiroth · 16-06-2023, 23:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

Nobody is answering the real point, which is consistency and justice.

Of course, no-one on this forum wants to discuss that, do they?

Never mind, the avoidance or silence says it all.

Dragging the Blair business into the matter of Boris' demise is nothing more than a contrivance. The events of 20 years ago have nothing to do in context, reason nor sensibility with the Boris situation.

The sanctimonious toads of the Privileges Committee rightly found Boris to be a lying toad for reasons obvious to all.

The country had hoped for a Boris who could do better than he actually did and got far less. He lied to the nation about the Irish Sea border; he lied to the nation when he claimed that he'd fixed social care He got got because he lied to Parliament.