Updated: Boris resigns as party leader

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Paul

Not really any different to others on here who will never say they did anything right.

I'll go on the record to say that their support for Ukraine has been first class. There is a smell of expediency to deflect attention but the end justifies the means.

[Dave42]

Originally Posted by ianch99

I'll go on the record to say that their support for Ukraine has been first class. There is a smell of expediency to deflect attention but the end justifies the means.

yes they been good on support for Ukraine but remember the Russian money tories took and the son of former KGB agent made a lord against the security advice

hopefully they never take Russian money again and they need to clean up all the Russian dirty money in London

[OLD BOY]

Originally Posted by jfman

I’m unsure how you can lie about an event that demonstrably didn’t take place.

I think you need to explain that one, jfman.

[jfman]

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

I think you need to explain that one, jfman.

I’m not really sure what benefit it would give. Your previous statement is false. I think it’s clear to everyone except you why.

Originally Posted by Dave42

yes they been good on support for Ukraine but remember the Russian money tories took and the son of former KGB agent made a lord against the security advice

hopefully they never take Russian money again and they need to clean up all the Russian dirty money in London

And let’s not forget when, as Foreign Secretary, Johnson left his Security back in the U.K. whilst he attended a weekend* party at said former KGB agent’s son’s Italian castle…

*The day before flying out he had been in Brussels for talks with the US secretary of state and other Nato leaders to discuss how to deal with Russia in the aftermath of the nerve agent poisonings in Salisbury (carried out by the FSB, successors to the KGB)

[OLD BOY]

Originally Posted by jfman

I’m not really sure what benefit it would give. Your previous statement is false. I think it’s clear to everyone except you why.

It is not false. Starmer has changed his story about how many people went for the curry, he lied about it not being planned, and so on.

So how you can say the statement I made is false, I don’t know. Were you there?

[Dave42]

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

It is not false. Starmer has changed his story about how many people went for the curry, he lied about it not being planned, and so on.

So how you can say the statement I made is false, I don’t know. Were you there?

but of course the biggest liar in uk as never done anything wrong once according to you OB and how many time did he change his story about all the parties they had

[jfman]

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

It is not false. Starmer has changed his story about how many people went for the curry, he lied about it not being planned, and so on.

So how you can say the statement I made is false, I don’t know. Were you there?

These are very serious allegations against a Knight of the Realm, OB.

It’s pretty obvious your previous statement was false. I notice you more suitably offered caveats to your claims against him in your latest attempt at this smear than a mere 12 hours ago.

Originally Posted by jfman

These are very serious allegations against a Knight of the Realm, OB.

Serious enough for the police to investigate.

[OLD BOY]

Originally Posted by jfman

These are very serious allegations against a Knight of the Realm, OB.

It’s pretty obvious your previous statement was false. I notice you more suitably offered caveats to your claims against him in your latest attempt at this smear than a mere 12 hours ago.

What, specifically, was wrong with my statement? As usual, you are being very vague.

Interesting that you believe that when a bloke has a 'Sir' attached to his name, he can never lie. That sword the Queen has must have the most extraordinary powers!

[jfman]

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

What, specifically, was wrong with my statement? As usual, you are being very vague.

Interesting that you believe that when a bloke has a 'Sir' attached to his name, he can never lie. That sword the Queen has must have the most extraordinary powers!

I’ll provide a suitable dissection of your posts when he’s cleared for the second time. Between now and then I’m content to leave you looking ridiculous on the end of that straw.

I don’t believe anything of the sort. In fact this is a special occasion I tend to ignore these titles because they’re an outdated anachronism.

Originally Posted by jfman

I’ll provide a suitable dissection of your posts when he’s cleared for the second time. Between now and then I’m content to leave you looking ridiculous on the end of that straw.

I don’t believe anything of the sort. In fact this is a special occasion I tend to ignore these titles because they’re an outdated anachronism.

He wasn’t “cleared the first time’ because a proper investigation wasn’t carried out initially and given Starmer’s constant jiggling of information from that evening & the lying, it cannot and should not be ignored, just because it bothers you, just because it is someone in potential legal jeopardy, other than Boris.

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by Mick

He wasn’t “cleared the first time’ because a proper investigation wasn’t carried out initially and given Starmer’s constant jiggling of information from that evening & the lying, it cannot and should not be ignored, just because it bothers you, just because it is someone in potential legal jeopardy, other than Boris.

Innocent until proved guilty Mick?
Boris has been found guilty, Sir Keir not yet. Maybe wait and see.....

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Mick

He wasn’t “cleared the first time’ because a proper investigation wasn’t carried out initially and given Starmer’s constant jiggling of information from that evening & the lying, it cannot and should not be ignored, just because it bothers you, just because it is someone in potential legal jeopardy, other than Boris.

I think Johnson wishes it was a potential FPN! The potential bit is whether the charge of lying to Parliament can be proved.

Originally Posted by Mr K

Innocent until proved guilty Mick?
Boris has been found guilty, Sir Keir not yet. Maybe wait and see.....

Visit Specsavers man. The word “potential” has a meaning & is there in my post, Mr K.