Election 2019 - Week 4 - Page 8

**Hugh** · 02-12-2019, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9223846.html

What a low life party. All sponsored by Putin no doubt.

Also..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50624086

Quote:

Facebook has deleted a Conservative election ad that used BBC News footage because it infringed the corporation's intellectual property (IP) rights.

The BBC said the material had been used out of context in a way that "could damage perceptions of our impartiality".

On Thursday, the Tories rejected a request from the BBC's lawyers to remove the 15-second video.

The BBC also complained to Facebook, which has now deleted the ad.

In a statement, Facebook said: "We have removed this content following a valid intellectual property claim from the rights holder, the BBC.

"Whenever we receive valid IP claims against content on the platform, in advertising or elsewhere, we act in accordance with our policies and take action as required."

Mr K · 02-12-2019, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/i...st-jc-1.493698

One has to wonder who is feeding the Jewish Chronicle such false information, and why?

I don't think you do need to wonder....

richard s · 02-12-2019, 21:01

Is there any evidence from the Jewish community about some Labour activists being hateful towards the Jewish people.

This article from:
https://www.thejc.com/news/world/bel...nesco-1.493790

really is over the top and is not funny in the slightest and should be banned. Question is who's horrible float is it.

Sephiroth · 02-12-2019, 23:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s

Is there any evidence from the Jewish community about some Labour activists being hateful towards the Jewish people.

This article from:
https://www.thejc.com/news/world/bel...nesco-1.493790

really is over the top and is not funny in the slightest and should be banned. Question is who's horrible float is it.

Is the article over the top or the behaviour of the Belgian Mayor in commending that float?

**Mick** · 03-12-2019, 01:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9223846.html

What a low life party. All sponsored by Putin no doubt.

Who sponsors you for promoting nothing but utter rubbish?

Remember, which leader came to Putin’s defences when the Scruples were being poisoned on our streets and it wasn’t the Conservatives, is was the real low life party, lead by Corbyn.

jfman · 03-12-2019, 01:06

https://twitter.com/russianembassy/s...270605312?s=21

Let’s remember who the Russians were backing in 2017.

**Mick** · 03-12-2019, 08:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

https://twitter.com/russianembassy/s...270605312?s=21

Let’s remember who the Russians were backing in 2017.

Clearly not the Tories, that looks like a typical Russian piss take.

It’s still irrelevant and does not alter the fact of Terrorist loving Corbyn, defending Russia and Putin, during the Salisbury poisonings.

jfman · 03-12-2019, 09:11

I don't think he was defending the Russians I think he simply wanted the investigation to proceed without jumping to conclusions. There's still more questions than answers to that case.

Sephiroth · 03-12-2019, 11:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

I don't think he was defending the Russians I think he simply wanted the investigation to proceed without jumping to conclusions. There's still more questions than answers to that case.

No he didn’t. Corbyn went native so as to keep in with his Russian friends esp. Putin ex-KGB in the Commie regime.

**Mick** · 03-12-2019, 11:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

I don't think he was defending the Russians I think he simply wanted the investigation to proceed without jumping to conclusions. There's still more questions than answers to that case.

What you think is immaterial, the fact is, there was strong evidence at the time that implicated it was Russia and Corbyn was dithering, demanding further various testing.

heero_yuy · 03-12-2019, 11:25

Quote:

Quote from The Sun:

Leaked papers used by Jeremy Corbyn to smear the Tories were last night linked to a Kremlin fake news campaign.

The dossier, said to show Boris Johnson would sell the NHS to Donald Trump, was ripped off the online forum Reddit.

But analysts say the papers, waved by Mr Corbyn at an election rally, bore the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign called Secondary Infektion.

Ben Nimmo, head of investigations at media analytics outfit Graphika, said: “It’s on the same set of websites, it’s using the same types of accounts and making the same language errors. It’s either the Russian operation or someone trying hard to look like it.”

Corbyn peddling fake Russian news. Who'd have thought it?

(BTW I linked the Sun but it's in most news outlets)

tweetiepooh · 03-12-2019, 12:01

The LibDems are promising to plant lots of trees. They'll need it to replace all those cut down for the volume of paperwork they've sent us both directly (addressed to both my wife and I and each of us individually) and unaddressed mail drops.

I think Labour and Tories have maybe one or two at most.

jfman · 03-12-2019, 12:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

What you think is immaterial, the fact is, there was strong evidence at the time that implicated it was Russia and Corbyn was dithering, demanding further various testing.

I think we're confusing facts and opinions again.

**Mick** · 03-12-2019, 13:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

I think we're confusing facts and opinions again.

Yes you and only you. certainly are.

---------- Post added at 12:02 ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy

Corbyn peddling fake Russian news. Who'd have thought it?

(BTW I linked the Sun but it's in most news outlets)

Who’d have thought it, Russian interference that is an attempt to help Corbyn. Blows the crazy assumptions that the Russians want the Tories to win.

jfman · 03-12-2019, 14:25

The papers are either clearly civil service briefing for meetings or they aren't. If Russian sources are involved in providing them I fail to see the relevance. If they're genuine they are genuine. If not that should be easy to prove.