U.S President: Donald Trump

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by passingbat

No! he just made the right decision




You clearly don't understand the US voting system. That remark is pointless, given the system they choose

he doesn't understand ours either .

[passingbat]

Originally Posted by Mick

You keep throwing out this crap argument and I keep telling you cannot have California and New York deciding who is President and forgetting about all the ones in the in the middle.

Especially California; America would be run over by Illegal immigrants, guilty of crimes and released from jails. Law and order would be over. Maybe Trump should build a second wall separaring California if they don't come to their senses and start obeying Federal Laws

Originally Posted by passingbat

Especially California; America would be run over by Illegal immigrants, guilty of crimes and released from jails. Law and order would be over. Maybe Trump should build a second wall separaring California if they don't come to their senses and start obeying Federal Laws

I thought the Republican Party and the Tea Party was all about “States’ Rights"?

[pip08456]

Something Trump supporters and haters can both enjoy (in different ways)

Trumpy Bear!

[passingbat]

Originally Posted by Hugh

I thought the Republican Party and the Tea Party was all about “States’ Rights"?

I believe certain Federal Laws 0ver ride State laws, Such as Protecting the safety of the United States of America?


Would you like illegal immigrants who have commited crimes in the UK, released from jail, free to wander around the UK?

Originally Posted by Mick

They have to have committed an impeachable offense. High crime or misdemeanor, first for it to become a democratic decision in the House of Representatives and then the Senate. The process can take a long time. Bill Clinton was Impeached by the House, but cleared in the Senate, thus, he was not removed from office.

People call Trumps tweeting in to question but the President is entitled to his First Amendment rights like every other American citizen is.

A misdemeanor is about a President abusing his Constitutional powers.

A President cannot be removed from office because someone doesn't like how orange they look (I think calling someone how they look by the colour of the skin is plain nasty and ignorant btw) or how much crap someone thinks they are posting on twitter and obviously twitter was not around when the Constitution was written.

People with Republican Party allegiance had to put up with Obama for 8 years and yes there was even protests when he won the Presidency.

But just going back to the popular vote. When it was Bush vs. Al Gore, I really wanted Al Gore to win, the days when I was all for Democrats, a lots changed since then. Gore won the popular vote by hundreds of thousands.

Gore won the popular vote, but there was a bit of a tussle with Florida, Gore had 266 Electoral College votes, Bush had 246, Bush needed Florida to win, but so did Gore, this was the closest presidential election in the nation's history, with a .009% margin, 537 votes was in it, a recount was called for and ultimately the decision went to the Florida Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. The high court's contentious 5:4 decision that was announced on December 12, 2000, ended a statewide recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court on December 8, effectively awarding Florida's 25 EC votes to Bush and as history recalls, granting him the Presidency.

http://www.marieclaire.com/politics/...appearing-tan/

Originally Posted by passingbat

I believe certain Federal Laws 0ver ride State laws, Such as Protecting the safety of the United States of America?


Would you like illegal immigrants who have commited crimes in the UK, released from jail, free to wander around the UK?

You appear to have missed my point - one of the tenets of the Tea Party and a large section of the Republican Party is that States know better than the Federal Government about which laws are best applied in their individual states, as they think that the Federal Government "over-reaches".

But to answer your point - I believe if an undocumented immigrant has committed a crime, they should be deported.

Originally Posted by Mr Banana

http://www.marieclaire.com/politics/...appearing-tan/

Sorry (well, actually I am not), I don't click links that people don't bother to explain what they are linking to and why.

I hope you're not trying to justify calling someone by their skin colour. Given that you have bold my reference to calling someone 'nasty and ignorant' for doing such a thing.

My point still remains, attacking someone by referencing their skin colour, is actually quite pathetic, which usually means they have no other valid argument to present, so they attack appearances instead.

Originally Posted by Mick

Sorry (well, actually I am not), I don't click links that people don't bother to explain what they are linking to and why.

I hope you're not trying to justify calling someone by their skin colour. Given that you have bold my reference to calling someone 'nasty and ignorant' for doing such a thing.

My point still remains, attacking someone by referencing their skin colour, is actually quite pathetic, which usually means they have no other valid argument to present, so they attack appearances instead.

Mick - I have no valid argument I want to present about this egotistical moron. I think the man is a disgusting, repulsive excuse for a human being and I have no problem calling a man who chooses to paint himself orange - an orange baffoon.

Is that clear enough for you?

[pip08456]

Originally Posted by Mr Banana

Mick - I have no valid argument I want to present about this egotistical moron. I think the man is a disgusting, repulsive excuse for a human being and I have no problem calling a man who chooses to paint himself orange - an orange baffoon.

Is that clear enough for you?

It would appear your link does not agree with your POV, pity you didn't read it before posting.

Trump might *never* have had a spray tan addiction to begin with.

There's a lot about Donald Trump that we can never understand or unpack, but this? This seems doable. So let's dig deep into an investigation of what appears to be Trump's breakup with his spray tan.

To get to the bottom of things, we reached out to an expert who's worked with Trump personally—Cleveland-based makeup artist Jason Kelly, who handled Trump's look (and a slew of other prominent Republicans) at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

"He didn't have any liquid or cream foundation on, or spray tan actually," Kelly reveals, explaining that the key to spotting a spray tan is all in the knuckles (or elbows/knees/anywhere the body bends), where you'll see creases that give the tan away. "The newer ones nowadays are a lot better, but I have an eye for it and I can spot it a mile away."

What's more, Kelly reports that the orange tone we see in pictures might be more a result of lighting than of Trump's tanning routine. "When I met him, he didn't really look orange at all," Kelly explains. "Not the way he did in all the previous pictures I had seen when I was doing my homework."

Originally Posted by pip08456

It would appear your link does not agree with your POV, pity you didn't read it before posting.

I could post hundreds of other links to sites that point out that his colour is due to spray tanning or sun beds.

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by Mr Banana

I could post hundreds of other links to sites that point out that his colour is due to spray tanning or sun beds.

Why spray yourself orange though? He just looks like an oompa loompa gone wrong....

Originally Posted by Mr Banana

Mick - I have no valid argument I want to present about this egotistical moron. I think the man is a disgusting, repulsive excuse for a human being and I have no problem calling a man who chooses to paint himself orange - an orange baffoon.

Is that clear enough for you?

The bit I've put in bold is clear enough, sure.

He paints himself orange, wow, that's a new one on me. I did not realise having a different coloured skin was such an issue to you. This coming from a man who has a username as a yellow fruit... Okay then.

His skin colour looks normal to me but then again I don't pay too much attention to how he looks, but thanks for confirming you cannot present any valid argument and prefer to lower yourself to 'nastyness' to try and justify your hatred.

Originally Posted by Mick

The bit I've put in bold is clear enough, sure.

He paints himself orange, wow, that's a new one on me. I did not realise having a different coloured skin was such an issue to you. This coming from a man who has a username as a yellow fruit... Okay then.

His skin colour looks normal to me but then again I don't pay too much attention to how he looks, but thanks for confirming you cannot present any valid argument and prefer to lower yourself to 'nastyness' to try and justify your hatred.

You are missing the point - I don't want to have a valid argument - I despise the man.

[Stephen]

Who needs a valid argument the guy is a top closs tool of the highest order. Resorting to childish name calling and non-factually correct statements.

no-one can sink as low as he does!