U.S President: Donald Trump - Page 194

**Mick** · 05-01-2018, 12:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456

A thought provoking tweet.

Personally I found it hilarious.

https://twitter.com/larryelder/statu...96965857423360

Exactly. The book is a fraud. But let the left and libs waste their money, on pure fiction.

**Hugh** · 05-01-2018, 13:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

That still is adjoining/connected to their house, doesn’t put them in the clear, if evidence was being burned/destroyed.

So the Clintons kept their incriminating evidence in the Secret Service facility - seems credible...

The Secret Service facility is not connected to the Clinton’s home - I suppose they could have had a underground tunnel connecting it to their Secret Base in a volcano.

http://poundridge.dailyvoice.com/wea...rrives/730242/

1andrew1 · 05-01-2018, 14:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

Exactly. The book is a fraud. But let the left and libs waste their money, on pure fiction.

I think Trump should have ignored the book. He's given it a lot more publicity which is what the publishers probably intended. He's fallen into their trap hook line and sinker!

**Damien** · 05-01-2018, 14:23

Or he has a sneaky little cut of the sales

1andrew1 · 05-01-2018, 14:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Or he has a sneaky little cut of the sales

I guess that's marginally more likely than the Clintons outsourcing storage of their incriminating evidence to the secret service!

1andrew1 · 05-01-2018, 17:42

Great live updates on the book here.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a8143136.html

**Mick** · 05-01-2018, 18:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

Great live updates on the book here.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a8143136.html

Yawn.

Piers Morgan sums it up in a tweet just now...

Quote:

Piers Morgan‏ @piersmorgan

Everyone in NYC, DC & LA is going absolutely nuts about every juicy detail of Michael Wolff's (sensational!) book.
The rest of America, the part that voted for Trump, won't give a monkey's cuss about any of it.

Mr K · 05-01-2018, 19:15

He does seem to have a cult following. If he murdered his granny live on air, they'd still vote for him ! However these diehards will be in the minority come the next election. The first past the post system could undo him and the Republicans.

05-01-2018, 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K

He does seem to have a cult following. If he murdered his granny live on air, they'd still vote for him ! However these diehards will be in the minority come the next election. The first past the post system could undo him and the Republicans.

The books in 4 years time, when he is replaced will make better reading.

**Hugh** · 05-01-2018, 19:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

Yawn.

Piers Morgan sums it up in a tweet just now...

Quote:

Piers Morgan‏ @piersmorgan

Everyone in NYC, DC & LA is going absolutely nuts about every juicy detail of Michael Wolff's (sensational!) book.
The rest of America, the part that voted for Trump, won't give a monkey's cuss about any of it.

Well, the 60.8 million voters in the rest of the USA who voted for Clinton, rather than the 5 million Clinton voters who live in NYC, DC, & LA, might give a monkey’s cuss about it, and buy the book.

The NYC, DC, and LA voters were only 7.5% of the total Clinton vote, so Piers’ assertion may be more about him sucking up to Trump than being based in reality...

**Mick** · 05-01-2018, 20:23

The book is still fantasy Hugh, even the author himself admits it. Sheeple will be sheeple though and waste their money on pure fiction.

What's not fiction which has just gone BREAKING: GOP senators make first known criminal referral in congressional Russia probes, targeting author of Trump dossier. (Source: Associated Press).

---------- Post added at 19:23 ---------- Previous post was at 19:14 ----------

Quote:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two Republican senators have made the first known criminal referral in congressional investigations of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. They’re targeting the author of a dossier of allegations about President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham say they’ve referred former British spy Christopher Steele to the Justice Department for investigation about false statements he may have made about “the distribution of claims contained in the dossier.”

Lawmakers cannot prosecute criminal activity. But they generally refer any criminal violations they find to the Justice Department. The senators say part of the referral is classified.

The dossier was compiled during the campaign and contains allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia. It was partially paid for by Democrats.

There's the collusion and corruption right there with the Crooked Democrats.

https://apnews.com/281c60f078ed4e43bee3fb7f3e0598f8

**Damien** · 05-01-2018, 20:31

Since Trump had people actually working directly for him who've been charged (not referred) does that mean Trump is crooked too?

**Mick** · 05-01-2018, 20:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Since Trump had people actually working directly for him who've been charged (not referred) does that mean Trump is crooked too?

No, because if you remember, Trump fired Manafort and Flynn when he learned of their misdeeds.

And lets be honest the crimes they have been charged with are petty crimes, without absolutely no connection to any Russian collusion or election interfering.

Has any money changed hands you know of during the election from the Trump himself to pay for Opposition Research ?

The only money so far that is known to have been paid, is the DNC and Crooked Hillary paying Fusion GPS and which has now caused two GOP Senators to make Criminal referrals in Congress.

1andrew1 · 05-01-2018, 20:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Since Trump had people actually working directly for him who've been charged (not referred) does that mean Trump is crooked too?

Unless you follow Trump blindly, it makes him more crooked given the fact that they've been charged and not just referred.

**Damien** · 05-01-2018, 20:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

No, because if you remember, Trump fired Manafort and Flynn when he learned of their misdeeds.

And lets be honest the crimes they have been charged with are petty crimes, without absolutely no connection to any Russian collusion or election interfering.

Has any money changed hands you know of during the election from the Trump himself to pay for Opposition Research ?

The only money so far that is known to have been paid, is the DNC and Crooked Hillary paying Fusion GPS and which has now caused two GOP Senators to make Criminal referrals in Congress.

Right. So two actual criminal charges of people on Trump's payroll is not as a bad as two senators requesting that the head of a firm the DNC paid for is charged?

And Flynn was charged for lying. Just as Steele has been accused of lying. Why is that different?

I am all for this guy being charged and prosecuted if he lied under oath or committed some other crime. But the double standard where there is always some excuse or fake news if it's Trump but it's a open and shut case for the democrats is increasingly absurd.

Since the other two have been charged for 'petty' crimes then what has Steel been charged with?