The 2017 General Election

[Osem]

Look on the bright side - Salmond GONE, Robertson GONE, Sturgeon looking even more silly than May having lost a third of her 'pro independence' seats.

Then of course there was the icing on top of the cake news of Clegg, GONE.

Looks like his pro-remain stance wasn't quite as popular as he liked to portray.

The way some folks are talking anyone would think Corbyn's Labour had won when in reality they haven't despite being the big beneficiaries of a poor campaign by May and her team.

[pip08456]

Originally Posted by denphone

She won't resign pip.

Tim Farron has announced he is to make a statement as well in the next half hour.

How right you were den, didn't really mention seats lost either. She has lost momentum on a second Independence vote though!

[ianch99]

Some information on the party TM wants to bring on board to help her decide the future of this country:

7 things you didn't know about the DUP

1. They have called for the return of the death penalty
2. They've faced concerns over their comments about LGBT people
3. They once had an MP in Basingstoke
4. The party is iffy on climate change
5. They want more public spending
6. And to avoid a hard Brexit
7. They disagree with the Tories on key parts of the manifesto

[denphone]

Originally Posted by pip08456

How right you were den, didn't really mention seats lost either. She has lost momentum on a second Independence vote though!

Sturgeon is just as slimy and obnoxious as her predecessor and after last night it will go even more downhill for her in the future.

Originally Posted by ianch99

Some information on the party TM wants to bring on board to help her decide the future of this country:

7 things you didn't know about the DUP

1. They have called for the return of the death penalty
2. They've faced concerns over their comments about LGBT people
3. They once had an MP in Basingstoke
4. The party is iffy on climate change
5. They want more public spending
6. And to avoid a hard Brexit
7. They disagree with the Tories on key parts of the manifesto

Well if they agreed on everything, there would be no point in them existing would there. Hardly earth shattering points.

[Osem]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Well if they agreed on everything, there would be no point in them existing would there. Hardly earth shattering points.

You noticed that too.

[Pierre]

I can see Corbyn new slogan already.

"I did as well as Gordon Brown".

[pip08456]

Originally Posted by ianch99

1. They have called for the return of the death penalty Doesn't mean they'll get it but I wouldn't object for terrorists.
2. They've faced concerns over theircomments about LGBT people
3. They once had an MP in Basingstoke And??
4. The party is iffy on climate change Iffy explains a lot.
5. They want more public spending Who's in the real world here? You obviously aren't.
6. And to avoid a hard Brexit Fair enough.
7. They disagree with the Tories on key parts of the manifesto And??

Typical. I missed an "and" from Q2.

Originally Posted by Pierre

I can see Corbyn new slogan already.

"I did as well as Gordon Brown".

It's all relative though. He wasn't defending as many seats, he saw a better gain in both seats and votes whereas Brown lost it.

But more than anything it's two fingers up at everyone who said he would get destroyed.

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Damien

It's all relative though. He wasn't defending as many seats, he saw a better gain in both seats and votes whereas Brown lost it.

I'm just waiting for Liverpool to send their letter to the Premier League contesting the outcome of Chelsea winning the title because Liverpool did better than expected.

But more than anything it's two fingers up at everyone who said he would get destroyed.

Conceded.

[denphone]

Originally Posted by Damien

It's all relative though. He wasn't defending as many seats, he saw a better gain in both seats and votes whereas Brown lost it.

But more than anything it's two fingers up at everyone who said he would get destroyed.

Not a fan of him but he communicated his message far more with the public then May who was wooden and wanted to avoid the public generally all the time thinking all she had to do was to repeat our robotic slogans and messages all the time.

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Well if they agreed on everything, there would be no point in them existing would there. Hardly earth shattering points.

Did you read the link? This is the Telegraph i quoted ...

Yes, I read the link, why ?

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by pip08456

Typical. I missed an "and" from Q2.

This is an article from today's Telegraph. I thought it was interesting what the conservative media think of the DUP.

Do you really need to make such childish remarks? I guess you are upset about the Election but don't take your fustration out on me.

---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:04 ----------

Originally Posted by Paul M

Yes, I read the link, why ?

Just wondering

Originally Posted by Damien

It's all relative though. He wasn't defending as many seats, he saw a better gain in both seats and votes whereas Brown lost it.

But more than anything it's two fingers up at everyone who said he would get destroyed.

Labour drove a hard campaign. They had activists outside schools etc handing out leaflets about education cuts.

That said, it's leader, was still a catalyst to not running home. Had this been Andy Burnham. Yvette cooper, Labour would have romped home.