Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media News Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15-05-2014, 23:54   #31
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Answering an earlier point:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Which bit, the bit that states that co-ordination of Street works ( civils) has been in operation in the UK for 23 years.

Which means the bit about other operators jumping in and laying ducts adj other operators infrastructure when they are installing and/or repairing their network has been available in all that time but never taken advantage of.
The key part here is:

Quote:
Network operators will have the right to negotiate agreements on the coordination of civil works with telecoms operators for the purpose of broadband deployment.

If no agreement on such civil work coordination is reached within one month, any party can refer the issue to the competent national dispute settlement body. While the parties must cooperate fully with the dispute settlement body, any party also has the possibility to refer the case to a court.
On a one-to-one basis between operators and altnets rather than between code power operators and local authorities.

Given your incapability to accept being wrong I have better things to do than continue discussing this with a brick wall, though to answer your question yes, PIA has been used.

EDIT: Incidentally the first trial of PIA involved Virgin Media. Fujitsu deployed the network, VM provided the services over it. Greasby in the Wirral. Given you asked it was worth mentioning. Unfortunately the numbers didn't add up as Fujitsu's BDUK bid as part of a consortium with Virgin Media was an 'all or nothing' bid which couldn't work as BDUK was a series of local authority bids rather than a single large tender. PIA was going to be used for that had it come through, hence the trial of PIA and delivering services over an FTTP network at Greasby.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 16-05-2014, 00:17   #32
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:

Given your incapability to accept being wrong
Matched only by your incapability to accept reality.
Pierre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 00:32   #33
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,525
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Matched...
Do you think the new legislation is an opportunity for VM to expand its network using the ducting of other utilities?
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 00:44   #34
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
Do you think the new legislation is an opportunity for VM to expand its network using the ducting of other utilities?
They've already looked into it and tested it both using BT's passive infrastructure with fibre on their poles / in their ducts and Surf Telecom, using the electricity network's pylons and poles:

http://www.publications.parliament.u...80/580we13.htm
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 00:46   #35
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
Do you think the new legislation is an opportunity for VM to expand its network using the ducting of other utilities?
Nope. Because the " new" legislation, doesn't really offer anything " new".

It's been tried before.

I wouldn't rule out revisiting the Western Power model again. But I wouldn't like to day when. Or if.
Pierre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 07:57   #36
Mr Banana
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
They've already looked into it and tested it both using BT's passive infrastructure with fibre on their poles / in their ducts and Surf Telecom, using the electricity network's pylons and poles:

http://www.publications.parliament.u...80/580we13.htm
Since LG have been involved they have stopped everything that they were doing with 3rd parties including piggy backing anything BT.

Their view is that any network expansion will be expansion of their own network. Sirius May be able to confirm but may be subject to a NDA
  Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 08:20   #37
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top banana View Post
Since LG have been involved they have stopped everything that they were doing with 3rd parties including piggy backing anything BT.

Their view is that any network expansion will be expansion of their own network. Sirius May be able to confirm but may be subject to a NDA
You're correct, LGI have stopped the project to use the BT network off-net. A la ...everybody else. As it doesn't give us a USP.

However the above project, the Western power one, and a similar project was explored with SSE, is expanding the VM network.
Pierre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 16:04   #38
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,525
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
However the above project, the Western power one, and a similar project was explored with SSE, is expanding the VM network.
So, to clarify, are the Western Power and SSE projects still continuing then?
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2014, 16:19   #39
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM required to share infrastructure as of 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
So, to clarify, are the Western Power and SSE projects still continuing then?
Not as far as I know, but they are not totally dead in the water
Pierre is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:13.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum