Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
12-10-2013, 13:57
|
#16
|
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,379
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
"High rollers like pension funds" that pay the pensions of ordinary retired people.......
|
Yes ordinary retired Australians in the water companies case, that leveraged debt upon said water company, didn't pay any tax, didn't do much re infrastructure and put the bills up by a third. Sound like.people you'd want to do business with?
---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:55 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
Yeah, we wouldn't want our pension funds to make money would we. That way we can all retire on a healthy diet of fresh air and blame those evil Tories for that too... 
|
It's not our pension funds that own them but carry on
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 15:19
|
#17
|
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,519
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Yes ordinary retired Australians in the water companies case, that leveraged debt upon said water company, didn't pay any tax, didn't do much re infrastructure and put the bills up by a third. Sound like.people you'd want to do business with?
---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:55 ----------
It's not our pension funds that own them but carry on
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24488144
Quote:
Mr Cable said: "You get an enormous amount of froth and speculation in the aftermath of a big IPO [initial public offering] of this kind.
"The bulk of the shares have gone to long-term institutional investors, stable investors, some overseas investors, but mainly British pension funds and insurance companies who are there for the long term.
|
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 20:55
|
#18
|
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,379
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24488144
|
Course they are Vince just like the water and power companies
http://news.sky.com/story/1152622/ro...-to-get-shares
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 21:18
|
#19
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
George done his friends another favourr probably but what the hey no one cares so onto the next thing. I'm getting less and less interested in politics by the day and can see the next general election being the first in my adult life where i won't bother voting.
|
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 21:22
|
#20
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
If George was doing his friends a favour he'd have favoured larger share applications.
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 21:38
|
#21
|
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,379
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
If George was doing his friends a favour he'd have favoured larger share applications.
|
He did that's why 70% of the shares weren't available to the public.
http://news.sky.com/story/1151131/ro...mall-investors
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 22:17
|
#22
|
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,519
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
If George was doing his friends a favour he'd have favoured larger share applications.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
|
from TD's previous link on this page...
http://news.sky.com/story/1152622/ro...-to-get-shares
Quote:
That decision may prove to be contentious because some British private investors are likely to be excluded because they placed orders for more than £10,000-worth of Royal Mail shares.
Ministers are expected to argue that those who placed orders for more than £10,000 were professional rather than private investors, although observers pointed out that many of them - understood to number in the handful of thousands - were likely to be core Conservative voters.
|
Seems not to be helping his 'friends'[/quote]
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
12-10-2013, 23:49
|
#23
|
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,379
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
|
[/QUOTE]
Hugh he's helping his very best friends
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...il-shares.html
and the very last couple of lines were telling to, british funds lost out to sovereign wealth funds from abroad, fantastic, what were you saying again Vince?
|
|
|
13-10-2013, 09:26
|
#24
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Helping his mates, selling it too cheap, blah, blah, blah. Whatever he'd have done some people would be whining. The price these shares are currently trading at has nothing to do with the fundamentals of the business and the fact that major pensions funds and investment companies have bought into the issue is a very good thing for the business and millions of ordinary pension holders and savers whose funds/returns have been having a pretty hard time in recent years. Don't let that spoil the anti-Govt. agenda though eh...
|
|
|
13-10-2013, 09:40
|
#25
|
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,943
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
Helping his mates, selling it too cheap, blah, blah, blah. Whatever he'd have done some people would be whining. The price these shares are currently trading at has nothing to do with the fundamentals of the business and the fact that major pensions funds and investment companies have bought into the issue is a very good thing for the business and millions of ordinary pension holders and savers whose funds/returns have been having a pretty hard time in recent years. Don't let that spoil the anti-Govt. agenda though eh...
|
I think the best thing for ordinary people and businesses will be how the Royal Mail performs post-privatisation. If it's sold off cheaper than it perhaps should have been then that's not great, regardless of how it helps investment funds, but it's not the worst thing in the world. However the Government will be judged long term on the effects of privatisation.
|
|
|
13-10-2013, 10:40
|
#26
|
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,519
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
In the Times today, it said that most of the trading was in small amounts (personal buyers).
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
14-10-2013, 09:52
|
#27
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sawbridgeworth
Services: Vivid 200
Tivo 500GB
Posts: 366
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
It doesn't matter what the share price will be in 3 months time, it's what they could have been sold for when they were issued. It's glaringly obvious that they were sold off too cheaply. However, It's easy to say that the price was set to help Tory 'friends', but it's more likely that the price was set low to ensure that they sold, because after all, politicians' reputations are far more important than little things like getting value for money.
As with previous privatisations, the shares will eventually end up with the big institutional investors. As with previous privatisations, we will find ourselves with a cartel of price-fixing companies.
|
|
|
14-10-2013, 15:11
|
#28
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sutton In Ashfield Nottinghamshire
Age: 60
Services: Sky TV, VM 100Meg Broadband
Posts: 671
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
|
Sir Paul Ruddock, Lansdowne's former chief executive, was also awarded a knighthood last year after donating £500,000 to the Conservative Party.
|
Now where have we seen that before??
|
|
|
14-10-2013, 18:04
|
#29
|
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,519
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nidge41
Now where have we seen that before??
|
Perhaps it was here or here.....
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
14-10-2013, 18:12
|
#30
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on holiday by mistake
Age: 56
Services: Vivid 200, Full House, V6 x2
Posts: 5,977
|
Re: Was Royal Mail sold too cheaply?
With the buy limit in place on these shares spread bets can be a very lucrative path to tread. You can make a ton of cash if you're smart.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26.
|