New info about Princess Diana death

Originally Posted by Derek

Except they don't. What they have is a letter from the EX parents in law of a soldier.

what i want to know is ,was there a grassy knoll involved

[nashville]

Not sure if we will ever find out the truth

[Arthurgray50@blu]

Irrespective of the the letter, IF the SAS did kill Diana, this order can only come from a high ranking MP.

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Irrespective of the the letter, IF the SAS did kill Diana, this order can only come from a high ranking MP.

Except they didn't kill her, the injuries sustained in the car accident killed her.

[Arthurgray50@blu]

Everyone think of this.

Where is the Fiat Uno - invloed in the crash, disappeared.

Why doesn't the French government show the CCTV of the tunnel at the time of the accident..

I think that if this is shown then the whole story willcome out and we will finally know the truth.

[dilli-theclaw]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Everyone think of this.

Where is the Fiat Uno - invloed in the crash, disappeared.

Why doesn't the French government show the CCTV of the tunnel at the time of the accident..

I think that if this is shown then the whole story willcome out and we will finally know the truth.

what would it take to connivance you there isn't a cover up going on?

Why do people worry about it 16 or so years later.
I would suggest 99.9% of the population has more important things to worry about.

[Russ]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Everyone think of this.

Where is the Fiat Uno - invloed in the crash, disappeared.

Why doesn't the French government show the CCTV of the tunnel at the time of the accident..

I think that if this is shown then the whole story willcome out and we will finally know the truth.

Arthur I've been down that tunnel - there is no CCTV.

Originally Posted by Russ

Arthur I've been down that tunnel - there is no CCTV.

you're trying to convince a conspiracy theorist of that , good luck

[Arthurgray50@blu]

Perfect place to kill someone then isn't it.

My main reasons are:

Where is the Fiat Uno, why would someone make up a story like this letter ? I believe there is a cover up, and l would love to know the truth. Yes, it may have been a tragic accident - but why cover up so much.

[Russ]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Perfect place to kill someone then isn't it.

What, a busy tunnel in one of the most famous cities in the world?

My main reasons are:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Where is the Fiat Uno,

Burnt out, at the bottom of a lake, on a scrap heap - take your pick.

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

why would someone make up a story like this letter ?

Attention, grudge against the forces etc

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

I believe there is a cover up, and l would love to know the truth. Yes, it may have been a tragic accident - but why cover up so much.

Nothing has been covered up.

[idi banashapan]

Originally Posted by heero_yuy

For the conspiracy theorists: Why would anybody want her dead? What possible cause would it serve? And how could a coverup take place in such a public arena?

Died In A Nasty Accident. End of.

I believe that is the point of a conspiracy. the answers to the questions you pose would not be known to the general public. if they were known, it wouldn't be a conspiracy, would it?

although I do not think there is any conspiracy in the death of Diana, let me humour your position, then explain my stance on 'conspiracy theories';

why would anybody want her dead?
Diana did a lot of work in third world countries clearing landmines and helping those less fortunate than ourselves. what if, during her work and investigations, she found out that supplied funding was being used (knowingly by our own government, or the government of another country) for weapons or some other illegal reason. she perhaps planned to tell the world of these findings. someone wanted her hushed and the secrets brushed under the carpet.

What possible cause would it serve?
by not allowing the information into the public domain, the illegal movement of money could continue to serve those who controlled it's movement and use. those in power remain in power. the more power one has, the more power one wants. the same goes for money. people with extraordinary power can go to extraordinary lengths to ensure their place is secure. if it were our own government who had a big secret to hide, imagine the outrage, loss in trust and potential homeland issues such as rioting that might result in such a massive story.

And how could a coverup take place in such a public arena?
by making her death appear as an accident, the general public are far less likely to question the surrounding events. were she to go missing, be shot, suddenly stop being in the public domain and recluse, people would (rightly so) ask questions and demand full answers. that would be a lot harder to convince the public that nothing untoward was going on.

'conspiracy theory' has such negative connotations these days and seems to be nothing more than a synonym for generally accepted mocking and ridicule, in my opinion. if the same behaviours were about another topic, it would be deemed tantamount to bullying. as soon as anyone says anything that poses difficult questions (in terms of being able to answer, or indeed to simply confront emotionally), there is an immediate backlash consisting of attacking, finger pointing and tin hat references. it is good that people ask questions, even if the answers that have already been given are fact. if we never asked more than what we were told, how could we ever grow? if Newton didn't bother to ask more than what science of the time and the Church told him, no one would have ever heard of him.

people need to accept that sometimes we are not told everything about everything. things do happen that we don't know about or for reasons we will never understand, but that does not mean they didn't happen or they don't exist. to never question, but to follow blindly what you are told is detrimental in so many ways, not only to the individual, but to society and potentially, the greater good.

we really need to remove this negative attachment to the phrase 'conspiracy theory'. it does nothing more than dumb down and beat back yourself. it's akin to simply giving up and trusting anything you are told.

in the case of Diana's death, I believe it was nothing more than a tragic accident. all the same, I'm also not closed minded enough to think there is no possible chance of something that I currently do not know about happened that night. keep an open mind. plausible, possible and probable are not the same thing. the same as opinion, belief, truth and fact are not the same thing.

[Derek]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

why would someone make up a story like this letter ?

People admit to things they haven't done all the time. Pretty much any high profile incident will have people going to their local Police office to claim responsibility for a whole variety of reasons.

[Russ]

Originally Posted by idi banashapan

by making her death appear as an accident, the general public are far less likely to question the surrounding events.

Like that worked.

[idi banashapan]

Originally Posted by Russ

Like that worked.

let me rephrase it then...

to make her death appear as a road traffic accident (or indeed any type of accident), far more people will be far more likely to accept that this was indeed the cause.

for the accident to happen in a foreign country to whomever may have had any underhand involvement, would be a good way to distance themselves and not attract any unwanted attention - all focus on France.

remember, just because I am presenting these view points, it does in no way mean they are the views I hold as my belief. they are not.