Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Service
Reload this Page Superhub : R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Register FAQ Community Calendar

R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Reply
Page 6 of 45 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
 
Thread Tools
Old 23-05-2012, 22:16   #76
Sirius
Grumpy Fecker
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 17,033
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus View Post
you lot have got awful memories. Despite Ben's assertions that VM hate the vmng300 and cant wait to get rid of it, Igni said a couple of months ago that they were sorting out new firmware for it to enable upstream channel bonding, hence my request for updated info
Well it will be the first i have heard of it, I could well be wrong but i have not heard anything from my normal internal contacts.

---------- Post added at 21:16 ---------- Previous post was at 21:15 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
I have a strong vibe that this version of firmware will also fix the upstream bonding support.
Is that for the VMNG300 or the Superhub ?
__________________
The UK is now the regime of Kim Jong Starmer the UK's dictator
Sirius is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 23-05-2012, 22:33   #77
BenMcr
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Services: 360 x2, Maxit TV, Sky Sports and Sky Cinema. Gig1
Posts: 17,929
BenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny stars
BenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny stars
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus View Post
Despite Ben's assertions that VM hate the vmng300 and cant wait to get rid of it
What assertions?
BenMcr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2012, 22:41   #78
Skie
a giant headend
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,169
Skie has reached the bronze age
Skie has reached the bronze ageSkie has reached the bronze ageSkie has reached the bronze ageSkie has reached the bronze ageSkie has reached the bronze ageSkie has reached the bronze ageSkie has reached the bronze age
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
He's got you confused with that masque/peter____ character. He's the one always blathering on about how the VMNG300 is unloved and will be ditched faster than a fast thing being ditched quickly.
Skie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 05:29   #79
hjf288
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Manchester/Ex-C&W
Age: 38
Services: 50Mbit
Posts: 340
hjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nice
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
The VMNG can't be updated to support 8 downstreams as the tuner only supports 4 channels..

I don't get the issue with upstream bonding though as its meant to handle 4...

But that's getting off topic..

Is the VMNG300 based on Broadcom or TI Puma 5? Would be nice to know why they are quite different jitter/latency wise and weather Netgear can iron out the kinks..
hjf288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 08:31   #80
General Maximus
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lincoln
Services: phone + 1gbit BB + SkyQ
Posts: 11,021
General Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronze
General Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronze
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr View Post
What assertions?
sorry I did it again. It was Masque who was always saying that it was obselete and VM want it off the network asap. That is why I was surprised and delighted when Igni said they were working on fw for it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hjf288 View Post
The VMNG can't be updated to support 8 downstreams as the tuner only supports 4 channels
Igni said it needs a firmware update for the upstream bonding to work. It can't support 8 ds channels but would need an update for it (which I would love) but I don't think they'll be doing one any time soon.
General Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 10:20   #81
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjf288 View Post
Is the VMNG300 based on Broadcom or TI Puma 5? Would be nice to know why they are quite different jitter/latency wise and weather Netgear can iron out the kinks..
I'd posit the networking problems are because the network stack on the Superhub is 11 years out of date.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 15:07   #82
hjf288
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Manchester/Ex-C&W
Age: 38
Services: 50Mbit
Posts: 340
hjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nice
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
I'd posit the networking problems are because the network stack on the Superhub is 11 years out of date.
Old Kernel version you mean? If so then it's pretty common for Broadcom equipment XD
hjf288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 15:21   #83
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
No, network stack.

eCos really isn't common for broadcom equipment.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 22:13   #84
hjf288
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Manchester/Ex-C&W
Age: 38
Services: 50Mbit
Posts: 340
hjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nice
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
No, network stack.

eCos really isn't common for broadcom equipment.
They are using eCos on it? Dang..
hjf288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2012, 22:40   #85
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,046
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Anyway, back to the R35 Firmware Beta Test.....
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2012, 03:39   #86
ileikcaek
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 346
ileikcaek is an unknown quantity at this pointileikcaek is an unknown quantity at this pointileikcaek is an unknown quantity at this pointileikcaek is an unknown quantity at this point
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
VM have pulled the plug on the test of this firmware:

Quote:
We've now closed our call for trialists and we'll be contacting them via email over the next week to confirm if they've got a place in the trial.

Unfortunately we've discovered some issues with the R35 late in our testing which mean we need to put the trial on hold until they are fixed. We're sorry about this delay but we're determined to make sure that the firmware we release is as solid as it can be. As soon as we're able to give you a firm date on the trial we'll post it here.
http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/...1236175#M21917

This did not surprise me at all to be honest! :/
ileikcaek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2012, 08:26   #87
General Maximus
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lincoln
Services: phone + 1gbit BB + SkyQ
Posts: 11,021
General Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronze
General Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronzeGeneral Maximus is cast in bronze
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
that is great, I really am laughing my ass off
General Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2012, 10:46   #88
kwikbreaks
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC, FoxSat HDR for TV, Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
I guess pulling the plug is better than releasing stuff known to be dodgy which would be pointless. Strange that they made a call for triallists before they'd finished their internal testing though as pulling it like this just invites criticism.
kwikbreaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2012, 11:48   #89
hjf288
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Manchester/Ex-C&W
Age: 38
Services: 50Mbit
Posts: 340
hjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nicehjf288 is just really nice
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Hilarious
hjf288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2012, 13:03   #90
Mick Fisher
Inactive
 
Mick Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northants
Age: 82
Services: Sky Unlimited FibrePro Sky Talk Sky+HD
Posts: 5,122
Mick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze array
Mick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze array
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
What great publicity this is for Netgear.
Mick Fisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 6 of 45 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:24.

Contact Us - Service Status - Cable Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum
Copyright © 2026 Cable Forum Hosted On Hetzner Cloud