100M : VMNG300 92Mbit limit

[qasdfdsaq]

Originally Posted by roughbeast

The VMNG300 wasn't used in the Coventry 200Mb trials. We were given alternative modems capable of 8 channels, which were used. Arris WBM760B was one of them.

I can be certain that it wasn't used in Ashford either. They used a variety of modems including Netgears and Motos, but not the VMNG300.

Not that phase, no, they were used in a different 200mb trial - which was more of a publicity stunt than an actual technical trial I hear.

[DigitalShadow]

Seem to get a speed over 92Mbit on my VMNG300 at peak time.

Silly virgin and their silly statements.

[Chrysalis]

my new superhub is getting very jittery again like my original one, at any time of the day even when my tbb graph is ok. But I will have to keep using it as my upstream channels are very unbalanced and the one the vmng300 locks on to is still highly utilised. In VMs words "as bad as it can get".

[General Maximus]

Originally Posted by DigitalShadow

Seem to get a speed over 92Mbit on my VMNG300 at peak time.

Silly virgin and their silly statements.

you obviously feel comfortable lieing and trying to deceive everyone. Don't think you can fool us all with your photoshopped speed tests when we all know a proficient team of engineers at VM have thoroughly tested both the VMNG300 and shub ensuring high a degree of confidence and reliability in the information they provide to the public, thus making yourself speed test result impossible.

[qasdfdsaq]

How many times do I have to say this - you cannot photoshop something you cannot modify.

[DigitalShadow]

Originally Posted by General Maximus

you obviously feel comfortable lieing and trying to deceive everyone. Don't think you can fool us all with your photoshopped speed tests when we all know a proficient team of engineers at VM have thoroughly tested both the VMNG300 and shub ensuring high a degree of confidence and reliability in the information they provide to the public, thus making yourself speed test result impossible.

It is nice to see that sarcasm hasn't been lost on the internet

---------- Post added at 22:49 ---------- Previous post was at 21:57 ----------

When things get to above 120Mbit, lets say 240mbit.

Will the config they send flat out not work with the VMNG300, or would it work, but only work up to the limits of 4 channels downstream?

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by DigitalShadow

It is nice to see that sarcasm hasn't been lost on the internet

---------- Post added at 22:49 ---------- Previous post was at 21:57 ----------

When things get to above 120Mbit, lets say 240mbit.

Will the config they send flat out not work with the VMNG300, or would it work, but only work up to the limits of 4 channels downstream?

It sounds like the VMNG300 will not even receive the 120Mb config let alone anything higher, if the company are stating that it is incapable of speeds above 92Mb why would they bother as they want a Superhub on your desk.

[General Maximus]

Originally Posted by Peter_

It sounds like the VMNG300 will not even receive the 120Mb config let alone anything higher

it will if they want to send it down. If I need to teach some basic maths then I will:

4 x 55mbit = 220mbit

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by General Maximus

it will if they want to send it down. If I need to teach some basic maths then I will:

4 x 55mbit = 220mbit

I expect they know that already, remember they are having to replace older modems just to get the new upload speeds probably because no one is writing the updated config for them such as all modems pre Ambit 256.

[qasdfdsaq]

Originally Posted by DigitalShadow

Will the config they send flat out not work with the VMNG300, or would it work, but only work up to the limits of 4 channels downstream?

The practical limits of the VMNG300 on 4 channels downstream IIRC are around 160-180 in "real world" situations.

Assuming no critical firmware bugs, the config file would just work, up to the limit of 4 DS channels.

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

The practical limits of the VMNG300 on 4 channels downstream IIRC are around 160-180 in "real world" situations.

Assuming no critical firmware bugs, the config file would just work, up to the limit of 4 DS channels.

It depends on whether they are willing to write the config for them seeming as they say those modems are not capable, I expect they would work if allowed.

[Andrewcrawford23]

Originally Posted by Peter_

It depends on whether they are willing to write the config for them seeming as they say those modems are not capable, I expect they would work if allowed.

if truly dnt work above 90mb then virgin where compete idiots to get a modem in which they coudl never upgrade speesd when they already planned 200mb at that point fora future service, it will handle p to 150mb fine above that it have prolems i dnt think makign the config file owuld be that hard just amend the current one it more virign just determine to hav the superhub as standard but dnt just use internal ****** to fine all teh modme and the accoutn there belong to and then send eeryone a new superhub (****** is covered sicne it a internal tool of virign)

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by Andrewcrawford23

if truly dnt work above 90mb then virgin where compete idiots to get a modem in which they coudl never upgrade speesd when they already planned 200mb at that point fora future service, it will handle p to 150mb fine above that it have prolems i dnt think makign the config file owuld be that hard just amend the current one it more virign just determine to hav the superhub as standard but dnt just use internal ****** to fine all teh modme and the accoutn there belong to and then send eeryone a new superhub (****** is covered sicne it a internal tool of virign)

We are talking about the VMNG300 which Virgin Media now say is incapable of 100Mb check out General Maximus signature above.

They want everyone on a Superhub.

[Andrewcrawford23]

Originally Posted by Peter_

We are talking about the VMNG300 which Virgin Media now say is incapable of 100Mb check out General Maximus signature above.

They want everyone on a Superhub.

i ws talking about the vmng300 it can easily do 105mb and probally 200mb at a struggle, i was pointing out that if virgin really wants everyone on superhub why not use ****** and find sort it by modems and stb and send out everyoen witha old modem a new superhub and peopel with stb arrrange a engineer viist not hard ot do it, ****** can list all the devices on teh network and once everyone on superhub any clones left should be easier to identify

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by Andrewcrawford23

i ws talking about the vmng300 it can easily do 105mb and probally 200mb at a struggle, i was pointing out that if virgin really wants everyone on superhub why not use ****** and find sort it by modems and stb and send out everyoen witha old modem a new superhub and peopel with stb arrrange a engineer viist not hard ot do it, ****** can list all the devices on teh network and once everyone on superhub any clones left should be easier to identify

I know not everyone will be happy with a Superhub but I expect that is the aim of the company especially with the propsed upgrades to double speeds.