Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
08-11-2011, 10:37
|
#16
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Because they know how to play the system like most of those that are not entitled to receive benefits but are stealing as much as they can while they can. These are the type that have forced the Government's hand and have made them take action at last, Unfortunately it also makes its harder for the genuine claimants 
|
Spot on sickens me to death these people. While these play system genuine will suffer histeria and hate. I saw a carer with someone just sorting things in supermarket car park. That carer got hell lot abuse even spat at told get proper job etc. We was talking afterwards its not the first time the hatred coming out people toward disabled/carers getting crazy.
The vile terrible atitude stirred by labour then coalisiton stinks. They created this bubble that all claiments are spongers worthless media hypebol. People are very thoughtless never engage brain follow sheep of persecution. I think it should be classed hate crime but police wont do anything.
|
|
|
08-11-2011, 10:53
|
#17
|
Trollsplatter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,090
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard1960
Indeed why i am not surprised.
I have a freind who genuinely claims this credit but its pretty much as described he picks up the phone to confirm his situation is the same.
|
I am in this situation and it is indeed exactly as described. I should add, I am trying to get out of the situation of working hard and earning little, but setting up businesses in the midst of this recession was never going to be an instant fortune-maker.
I was very surprised how easy it is. If any benefit is based on fulfilment of certain conditions (such as, in this case, hours worked), surely checks should be getting made to ensure the conditions are met. But I have never been subject to any checks.
|
|
|
08-11-2011, 14:59
|
#18
|
Virgin Media Employee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Winchester
Services: Staff MyRates
BB: VM 1Gb
TV: VM XL
Phone : VM XL
Posts: 3,285
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
I guess part of it will come down to cost vs savings. If it costs more to check properly than you'd save by just paying then why bother. Then you have the appeals so even if you do stop paying, what are the costs if the claimant then appeals?
The system is in need of a good seeing to so that those in need get enough and those who aren't in need don't get anything. And those caught cheating get severely punished.
__________________
I work for VMO2 but reply here in my own right. Any help or advice is made on a best-effort basis. No comments construe any obligation on VMO2 or its employees.
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 05:54
|
#19
|
Still alive and fighting
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of beyond and beyond.
Services: XL BB, 3 360 boxes , XL TV.
Posts: 56,637
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofthedead4
In the last two years I have become less and less able to walk and do general tasks due to having inflammatory arthritis in my ankles, knees, hips, elbows and hands. I applied for DLA last year and was turned down, mostly down to a letter from a doctor who I have NEVER seen saying I could walk. Today at 11.30 I have my appeal, wish me luck.
|
Good luck to you.
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 07:13
|
#20
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Leeds
Age: 54
Services: XXL customer with movies and sport +HD And now TiVo.
Posts: 657
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Well I got there just to be told that my appeal was being adjurned due to the lack of evidence from the DLA, waste of bleeding time. Why could they not have phoned me and let me know. The only thing they have said that I have now to wait for another date, I waited over a year for this date.
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 08:18
|
#21
|
Still alive and fighting
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of beyond and beyond.
Services: XL BB, 3 360 boxes , XL TV.
Posts: 56,637
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofthedead4
Well I got there just to be told that my appeal was being adjurned due to the lack of evidence from the DLA, waste of bleeding time. Why could they not have phoned me and let me know. The only thing they have said that I have now to wait for another date, I waited over a year for this date.
|
l cannot believe you have waited a year for your now postponed date and it just sums up a whole system in that it is total unorganised chaos.
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 10:58
|
#22
|
Born again teenager.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester. (VM area 20)
Age: 77
Services: Maxit TV, M250 Fibre BB.
Phone-Anytime Chatter
Posts: 13,838
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofthedead4
Well I got there just to be told that my appeal was being adjurned due to the lack of evidence from the DLA, waste of bleeding time. Why could they not have phoned me and let me know. The only thing they have said that I have now to wait for another date, I waited over a year for this date.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
l cannot believe you have waited a year for your now postponed date and it just sums up a whole system in that it is total unorganised chaos.
|
denphone has said it all. What an utter shambles. I would personally get in touch with my MP at this stage as such an unprofessional fiasco needs an MP Inquiry landing on the desk of the Manager of the office dealing with your benefit claim.
__________________
"I intend to live forever, or die trying" - Groucho Marx..... "but whilst I do I shall do so disgracefully." Jo Glynne
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 12:09
|
#23
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
l cannot believe you have waited a year for your now postponed date and it just sums up a whole system in that it is total unorganised chaos.
|
fully blame tories reap what they sow.
For the very few like these scratters they shoving genuine off there system shambles because ATOL so stupid. Goverments idiotic system of only getting paid when the throw pecentage off.
The system appeals is so full it going to take years to get through it not months. All they needed was to set the system up so genuine had no worries. The ones who was not rightful would should been weeded out. The current way has genuine very ill due to worry and stress of the worst. Sadly government believed there own hype train fueled by hate media gutter trash. Which would not be suprised fake reports where down to government to try make out more than 0.5% was fake claims.
The system needed rework for sure but not this abomidation on cheap thrill its suposed to make sure people on right money. Well many have been under claimed for years. Yet government not whinging about all the unclaimed funding people not getting. Sadly the population listened to the hype and lies fueled by media polititions afterall they would not lie would they. Sadly the odd screwballs like these then gets people to believe they all bad its stupid atitude. Wish people engage brains but seems despite educated they tend to get suckered.
So the whole situation this it will cost the government millions due to the overwhelming breakdown off the appeal system. As understand the government now contemplating the removal of allowing appeals. If they do it contravenes Human rights(guess this whole charade is anyway).
I hope disabled get together take this whole mess to EU human rights.
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 12:21
|
#24
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Dont know about the IB as the bbc has posted no evidence to support their statement (surprise surprise). IB isnt means tested so jjust because they got cash it doesnt mean it was wrongful claiming.
However I am shock they managed to claim WTC at the same time tho.
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 16:59
|
#25
|
Guest
Location: Essex
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
Thought i would post this,the man below used to serve in the army and his wife had health issues (learning difficulties) they were reduced to living on a very low amount,and were very probably entitled to more money but their claim seems to have had various setbacks with tragic consequences,here we have a couple of genuine people who the benefit system was desgned to help.
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/881136-m...-utter-poverty
Yet they were left to their fate whereby those able to play the system like the conway sisters get their pockets stuffed with cash, it makes me.  
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 17:46
|
#26
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,539
|
Re: Conwy sisters tried to claim £161m in VAT, court hears
The problem is, along with any system where you have millions* of applications/claimants going through a complicated process, some people will slip thru (be that genuine claimants who suffer or "fake" claimants who abuse it) - the problem with the present system is that "some" seems to have grown in to "quite a lot".
Unfortunately, presenting outliers and extreme examples as evidence of the majority doesn't help, it just stirs up resentment and ill-feeling.
*as of Jan 2011, 2.5 million people received Incapacity Benefit (2 million on IB, and 500k on ESA).
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:30.
|