Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
28-05-2011, 12:48
|
#556
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2011
Services: 50 Mb broadband; TV XL V+ & V, Phone XL
Posts: 485
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ynwa
Ill try. they told me over the phone it wasnt possible, but i have since read this forum and see it is possible. I just recently bought a new buffalo router with dd-WRT on it, and id much rather keep that.
Is it true the superhub cant do dual band g / n? Cos i really need it to.
|
It can do G and N devices fine; it cant do 2.4 GHZ + 5 GHZ at the same time though
|
|
|
|
28-05-2011, 13:18
|
#557
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Norwich
Services: 30meg Virgin Cable, Digital TV, Apple Computer system, Blackberry.
Posts: 18
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
The Superhub is NOT dual band meaning a choice of 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz is offered. On 2.4Ghz g/n is standard on the Superhub.
|
|
|
|
|
28-05-2011, 13:21
|
#558
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,249
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJS
It can do G and N devices fine; it cant do 2.4 GHZ + 5 GHZ at the same time though
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzie
The Superhub is NOT dual band meaning a choice of 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz is offered. On 2.4Ghz g/n is standard on the Superhub.
|
he just said that 
|
|
|
|
|
29-05-2011, 10:24
|
#559
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2011
Services: 50 Mb broadband; TV XL V+ & V, Phone XL
Posts: 485
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Just another update but I think you're getting the idea LOL also i've noticed over the last 2/3 days that my wifi signal has gone cleaner; has there been any small updated pushed that wont change the f/w version?
Compared to an earlier post; (the RSSI was always identical up until the last 3/4 days; laptops consistently in the same spot infront of my t.v. for these tests so theres no variation because of that)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJS
This is around 20 foot away; upstairs; and behind a steel RSJ.
And your trying to say theres problems with the wifi? |
|
|
|
|
|
29-05-2011, 10:28
|
#560
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,225
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
|
Just another update but I think you're getting the idea LOL also i've noticed over the last 2/3 days that my wifi signal has gone cleaner; has there been any small updated pushed that wont change the f/w version?
|
probably something in your area, less interference etc
|
|
|
|
|
29-05-2011, 12:09
|
#561
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2011
Services: 50 Mb broadband; TV XL V+ & V, Phone XL
Posts: 485
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Maybe; either way i'm glad i'm getting even better signal then I already was; also side note as an experiment i walked down the street with my phone on wifi to see how far it covers; as a rough estimate by using the distance scale on google maps to see how far away it stopped working at was I managed to get to about 50/60 meters away; after that the wifi was still locked but unresponsive
|
|
|
|
|
29-05-2011, 13:11
|
#562
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,225
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
when i was back on ADSL using a belkin n1 vision, i could get a signal at the local school some 100 metres away, the signal on that router was the best of any router iv ever seen
|
|
|
|
|
14-06-2011, 19:07
|
#563
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2011
Services: 50 Mb broadband; TV XL V+ & V, Phone XL
Posts: 485
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
2 Months now
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img][/QUOTE]
Never had any errors in the 'event log' section on the router 
|
|
|
|
|
14-06-2011, 20:06
|
#564
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Please can some one tell me if you use this super hub just hard wired does it work fine on 100 meg and is it just the wireless it is having problems with.
Many thanks
|
|
|
|
|
15-06-2011, 11:40
|
#565
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northants
Age: 82
Services: Sky Unlimited FibrePro
Sky Talk
Sky+HD
Posts: 5,122
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJS
|
Never had any errors in the 'event log' section on the router [/QUOTE]
Well lucky old you. 
Just to balance the equation mine still reboots several times most days and occasionally drops the wireless for no apparent reason.
|
|
|
|
|
15-06-2011, 11:52
|
#566
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 42
Services: 30Mb Broadband (XL), 2TB TiVo (M+), Samsung Galaxy Ace (M), POTS Landline (M).
Posts: 823
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJS
|
Wow, if only they were ALL like that. (Even so, ping time would be lower with a VMNG300).
|
|
|
|
|
15-06-2011, 12:10
|
#567
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rochdale
Posts: 58
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
I have a VMNG300 which I haven't activated just yet, thought I'll give the SH a reprieve
I usually get around ~70MB via SpeedTest.net however last night..
Repeated the test and it's been great, ~98 / 97 
Wireless isn't too bad (only use the Guest account for visitors), it's no worse then the DIR-615 however I have various APs around the house due to coverage required across four floors.
Uptime has been good so far, no reboots...
Removed the download usage as VM staff hang around so don't want to get into trouble!
|
|
|
|
|
15-06-2011, 12:47
|
#568
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 42
Services: 30Mb Broadband (XL), 2TB TiVo (M+), Samsung Galaxy Ace (M), POTS Landline (M).
Posts: 823
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by imranm
Removed the download usage as VM staff hang around so don't want to get into trouble!
|
I would have blanked out the whole column if I were you. That's clearly a three or four digit number. :P
|
|
|
|
|
15-06-2011, 12:53
|
#569
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rochdale
Posts: 58
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes
I would have blanked out the whole column if I were you. That's clearly a three or four digit number. :P
|
Ssssh! - Better now?
|
|
|
|
|
17-06-2011, 12:58
|
#570
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 42
Services: 30Mb Broadband (XL), 2TB TiVo (M+), Samsung Galaxy Ace (M), POTS Landline (M).
Posts: 823
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
I'm sorry... did I say three or four? I must have been mistaken: I honestly can't tell. 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
