Illegal channels. (Networking)
20-05-2011, 15:08
|
#1
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Coastal Northeast England.
Services: Virgin B/Band up to 10meg, wireless (Linksys Router), XP Pro., 64bit, Serv. pack 3.
Posts: 4
|
Illegal channels. (Networking)
Why is it illegal in the UK to use Channel 14 in my router?
|
|
|
20-05-2011, 15:15
|
#2
|
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Poole, Dorset
Age: 40
Services: FreeSat+
Tivo
V-Box
VM 60MBit
Posts: 13,365
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Probably because the frequency isn't licensed?
Just a guess.
|
|
|
20-05-2011, 15:21
|
#3
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2007
Services: 30mb BB, XL TV, V+, TiVo, talk unlimited.
Posts: 4,143
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Probably because the frequency that it operates at interferes with something else. Other countries also have channels that can't be used, e.g. Ch 14 can be used in Japan but iirc 12,13 and 14 can't be used in Germany.
edit: might be talking mince about Germany because I found this link:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TA25972
|
|
|
20-05-2011, 16:51
|
#4
|
81-82-83-84
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on holiday by mistake
Age: 55
Services: Vivid 200, Full House, V6 x2
Posts: 5,977
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
The centre frequency of channel 14 is 2484MHz and the band edge of the 2.4GHZ licence exempt WLAN allocation in the UK is 2483.5Mhz.
Like much of the spectrum around UHF/Microwave frequencies the MOD have a significant allocation. This particular part of the spectrum may be used by land and naval radar.
|
|
|
20-05-2011, 17:29
|
#5
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2007
Services: 30mb BB, XL TV, V+, TiVo, talk unlimited.
Posts: 4,143
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Peter
The centre frequency of channel 14 is 2484MHz and the band edge of the 2.4GHZ licence exempt WLAN allocation in the UK is 2483.5Mhz.
Like much of the spectrum around UHF/Microwave frequencies the MOD have a significant allocation. This particular part of the spectrum may be used by land and naval radar.
|
That makes sense then. You wouldn't want somebody connected wirelessly to CF accidently diverting a scud missile to one of the mod's homes
|
|
|
20-05-2011, 18:59
|
#6
|
This tastes nice
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hindley Green Wigan
Services: TV360/1gb internet
Posts: 562
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Radio Controled model aircraft also use 2.4ghz here in the U.K as well as 35mhz.
__________________
I once had Amnesia, i remember it well !!!
|
|
|
20-05-2011, 19:01
|
#7
|
81-82-83-84
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on holiday by mistake
Age: 55
Services: Vivid 200, Full House, V6 x2
Posts: 5,977
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LondonRoad
That makes sense then. You wouldn't want somebody connected wirelessly to CF accidently diverting a scud missile to one of the mod's homes 
|
 or at best you get a Merlin hovering over your back garden chucking sonobuoys into the fish pond.
It's also worth mentioning that part of the spectrum between 2500-2690MHz is the mucho anticipated 2.6GHz band for 4G mobile technology. Beyond that we have a 10MHz wide guard band and part of the S-band radar spectrum which is used by CAA/MOD Watchman radar equipment.
|
|
|
22-05-2011, 14:25
|
#8
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Coastal Northeast England.
Services: Virgin B/Band up to 10meg, wireless (Linksys Router), XP Pro., 64bit, Serv. pack 3.
Posts: 4
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Thanks a lot you guys for your thoughts and info! You were all very prompt and I think it is amazing that people want to help in what was really a non-urgent neutral issue. If I had a real problem of substance then it is reassuring to find that there are so many people that are eager to help! What a great community! Once again, thank you!
|
|
|
23-05-2011, 23:25
|
#9
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
One aggravation is that so many things are defaulted to the USA specification, 1-11 channels.
Here, I find the lower channels are useless (maybe it's a videosender nearby on ch.A), and everyone is on CH11 (secondary 7 for n). Now the ETSI spec 1-13 (assuming low channls did work), would allow two unconflicting wide n groups, 13,9 and 1,5
|
|
|
24-05-2011, 11:08
|
#10
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Coastal Northeast England.
Services: Virgin B/Band up to 10meg, wireless (Linksys Router), XP Pro., 64bit, Serv. pack 3.
Posts: 4
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Many thanks, Matth
---------- Post added at 11:08 ---------- Previous post was at 10:57 ----------
Afterthought; Is any one router channel best employed to watch live TV. Mine stutters or nothing at all!
|
|
|
26-05-2011, 00:33
|
#11
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Depends on the local situation, the 2.4G band is a mess shared with video senders (usually marked in channels A-D), Microwave ovens, Bluetooth, and probably a few things I can't remember.
If your Wifi adapter software has a channel scan feature, or there are some other programs to do it, then check for other Wifi - with any moderately strong signals, best to be 4 or more channels clear (maybe 3 at a pinch), or on the same channel so it will sense and try to avoid collision.
The standard 1-11 plan is 1, 6, 11
The optimal 1-13 plan is 1, 5, 9, 13
The compromise 4 channel 1-11 plan is 1, 4, 7, 11 - 3 spacing not being completely clear.
If a channel just will not work, there's probably something else on it - the Wifi channel scan only picks up Wifi with broadcast SSID, so will not find any other sources of conflict.
|
|
|
26-05-2011, 01:39
|
#12
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LondonRoad
That makes sense then. You wouldn't want somebody connected wirelessly to CF accidently diverting a scud missile to one of the mod's homes 
|
Haha, strangely they use encryption for data.
Anyway, my suggestion would be using a bit of WiFi scanning software to find the best (free-est) channel. Round here it's pretty full, but channel 1 seems to be least selected by default set-up routers.
|
|
|
26-05-2011, 18:06
|
#13
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Manchester
Services: VM 200M
Posts: 144
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
I use his program: http://www.metageek.net/support/downloads/ (inSSIDER v2) to check which channels are 'less crowded' in my location.
It has help me a great deal. Most WiFi router round me use Ch11 or CH7. I have found CH4 to be completely free. Guess which one I now use? Lol.
HTH
|
|
|
27-05-2011, 00:30
|
#14
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
Re: Illegal channels. (Networking)
http://www.xirrus.com/library/wifitools.php Xirrus is another one worth a look, and often, if you use the adapter software rather than Windows to configure, there will be a channel scan option in the control panel, certainly standard across all the Ralink chipset cards, which generally use standard Ralink drivers with little if any rebranding.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50.
|