Possible Bug in VMNG300 firmware?

[craigj2k12]

Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes

About the only bug I can find is that it says "Channel Id" on downstream (I have 93-96), then the correct "Channel ID" on the upstream (5). Hardly a dealbreaker.

Although now I look closer, upstream power level is rated 57 dBmV, is that within nominal range? (Downstream is ~-0.3 for all four.)

shouldnt be above 55

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes

Although now I look closer, upstream power level is rated 57 dBmV, is that within nominal range? (Downstream is ~-0.3 for all four.)

If you are having issues with an Upstream that high then we would normally tech it.

[craigj2k12]

Originally Posted by Masque

If you are having issues with an Upstream that high then we would normally tech it.

he wouldnt be having an issue otherwise it would have been apparent, he wouldnt have just "happened to notice it" when he checked the stats

however people report upstream problems at 55.1 never mind 57

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by craigj2k11

he wouldnt be having an issue otherwise it would have been apparent, he wouldnt have just "happened to notice it" when he checked the stats

however people report upstream problems at 55.1 never mind 57

He needs to report it to support to get it teched and it is good for other readers to see such an issue and realise that it can be worth calling in to get it resolved.

[craigj2k12]

Originally Posted by Masque

He needs to report it to support to get it teched and it is good for other readers to see such an issue and realise that it can be worth calling in to get it resolved.

i never said it wasn't

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by craigj2k11

i never said it wasn't

We expect people to call in above 55 as nowadays those levels are more likely to cause issues.

[craigj2k12]

well iv just had the superhub hooked up, and (not) to my surprise it is still activated, despite nopanics well written scripts

the channel it locked onto for the upstream was channel 6, and had the same frequency as channel 6 on the VMNG, so im missing out on channel 5 here, where has it gone? it was better on channel 5

[telfordcable]

Here is mine (VMNG300):

[Peter_]

Originally Posted by telfordcable

Here is mine (VMNG300):

Post your downstream as well.

[telfordcable]

Originally Posted by Masque

Post your downstream as well.

Here you go:

[pip08456]

Downstream waaaaay too high for a VMNG300!

[Hot_slim_buxom]

Originally Posted by pip08456

Downstream waaaaay too high for a VMNG300!

In Telford that probably an averge DS powerlevel.

[pip08456]

I just thought I'd humour him for a change as he has posted elsewhere the levels have just been checked by a tech and they are supposedly OK!

Posted today!

Originally Posted by telfordcable

Right the tech guy just been here and say my power level for 100 meg is now resolved and got max out 98.3Meg downloads and 9.83Meg uploads. He say I can continue to kept my VMNG300 for time being until the superhub fixed the firmware until late 2011 and he say that superhub still issues with 100 & 200 Meg

---------- Post added at 13:35 ---------- Previous post was at 13:29 ----------

I am still in talk and discussing with British Telecom Business of possible getting a Leased Line Fibre Optic (1:1) 100Meg down and 100Meg up £799.99 exc vat per month) 12 months contract with no throttle, no traffic management, totally UNLIMITED usages.

[zekeisaszekedoes]

Well mine have creeped higher on the upstream so I've passed it on to VM.

Telford's wild BSing about an £800 leased line...

[Skie]

Heh, my D/S channel ID's aren't in order: Channel Id 29 27 28

Probably means nothing, but it does seem odd.