Bring Back Fox Hunting - Page 32

10-06-2010, 12:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic

So, you are happy to say it was a fox without a shadow of a doubt? I'm sorry, I'm not convinced.

It's anything, but clear.

what's the foxs face got to do with it also?

why would you doubt the evidence ,what do you want cctv footage of the babies bedroom ?

Derek · 10-06-2010, 12:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic

So, you are happy to say it was a fox without a shadow of a doubt?

The wounds are consistent with bite marks from a fox. There are two choices.

1: The family have a small dog (no idea if they do or not), about fox sized, this attacked the two children. the parents found out, cleaned up the dog and concocted the story prior to contacting police and an ambulance.

2: It was a fox.

Personally I'm going for option 2.

**Hugh** · 10-06-2010, 12:42

Occam's razor.

TheDaddy · 10-06-2010, 12:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S

The wounds are consistent with bite marks from a fox. There are two choices.

1: The family have a small dog (no idea if they do or not), about fox sized, this attacked the two children. the parents found out, cleaned up the dog and concocted the story prior to contacting police and an ambulance.

2: It was a fox.

Personally I'm going for option 2.

+ they have a picture of the culprit

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...irls-cots.html

Derek · 10-06-2010, 12:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

+ they have a picture of the culprit

And he was caught on CCTV fleeing the scene.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

**Mick** · 10-06-2010, 13:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

+ they have a picture of the culprit

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...irls-cots.html

Not necessarily the culprit, what did they do, have a Fox identification parade or get a book of Fox mugshots to see which fox it was?

10-06-2010, 13:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S

And he was caught on CCTV fleeing the scene.

yeah and no tax or seat belt ,bet he's got no insurance either and those tyres look a bit suspect aswell

TheDaddy · 10-06-2010, 13:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

Not necessarily the culprit, what did they do, have a Fox identification parade or get a book of Fox mugshots to see which fox it was?

Yes and paw prints were taken

Digital Fanatic · 10-06-2010, 13:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

+ they have a picture of the culprit

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...irls-cots.html

If you read that article properly though, they say that it "may" of been the same fox.

Plus pest control destroyed a random fox close by that they caught. Nice.

There's more to this story than meets the eye.

---------- Post added at 13:06 ---------- Previous post was at 13:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

Not necessarily the culprit, what did they do, have a Fox identification parade or get a book of Fox mugshots to see which fox it was?

indeed.

10-06-2010, 13:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic

If you read that article properly though, they say that it "may" of been the same fox.

Plus pest control destroyed a random fox close by that they caught. Nice.

There's more to this story than meets the eye.

so the police took a picture of a fox at the house and one was destroyed nearby and you still maintain it wasn't a fox

**Mick** · 10-06-2010, 13:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Yes and paw prints were taken

That's really great.

What next, a visit from Ace Ventura?

Digital Fanatic · 10-06-2010, 13:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh

so the police took a picture of a fox at the house and one was destroyed nearby and you still maintain it wasn't a fox

I bet there were cats and dogs and other wildlife near by too... what next? You were near the seen so you must be guilty?

You see 2 black youths and theres just been a robbery, so it must be them

10-06-2010, 13:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic

I bet there were cats and dogs and other wildlife near by too... what next? You were near the seen so you must be guilty?

You see 2 black youths and theres just been a robbery, so it must be them

what is so hard about believing what the police and the parents have said ,if it was a pet dog that did it don't you think the press would have found out by now ?and cast doubt on the parents story to sell more papers
Even if it was a pet dog don't you think they would tell the police it was and get it destroyed after all who would want a pet that had just savaged you babies

TheDaddy · 10-06-2010, 13:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

That's really great.

What next, a visit from Ace Ventura?

Better that than a visit from some of the so called experts that have been quoted so far.

---------- Post added at 13:19 ---------- Previous post was at 13:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic

Plus pest control destroyed a random fox close by that they caught. Nice.

Yes very nice, in fact it possibly did old foxy a favour, the average life span for an urban fox is 18 months to 2 years due to disease and mange.

---------- Post added at 13:20 ---------- Previous post was at 13:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic

I bet there were cats and dogs and other wildlife near by too... what next? You were near the seen so you must be guilty?

You see 2 black youths and theres just been a robbery, so it must be them

Yes but none of them were seen by the mother doing it.

**Mick** · 10-06-2010, 13:21

I can understand the controlling of numbers, and the protecting of ones livestock but let's make no mistake - it was done purely for sport, perhaps some are failing to see the bigger picture, all this fox hunting of the past (and it still goes on) has driven these wild animals from rural areas and forced them to live in urban areas - if people weren't so messy with their litter, perhaps it wouldn't have drawn them in either.

I bet you got some snot nose Fox hunters right now blaming the ban on fox hunting for these attacks on these young girls.