Pandemic (Swine) Flu - Page 26

Gary L · 30-04-2009, 09:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C

Suspicion which could easily be diverted onto various terrorist groups.

But Mexico is a neutral place. ideal for testing the spread and its affects.

**Chris** · 30-04-2009, 09:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by zinglebarb

I said I was play devils advocate. Maybe the underground is phase 2

Release the test in a less secure country to reduce the risk of having plans found out. Then once you know its succesful hit the main target

I suspect the devil would be a whole lot cleverer than this. Let's face it, 'they' released their bio-weapon in a less secure country and you still sussed them within days.

Where are the real evil geniuses when you need them? We're surrounded by fools!

Gary L · 30-04-2009, 09:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

Supposition. Arousing suspicion would only happen if people were dying from it. Otherwise it's just a bad case of the flu which could easily have got in to the country.

Yes, but they don't need the hassle of it all. and it's worldwide terrorism that they want to test.

30-04-2009, 09:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

I suspect the devil would be a whole lot cleverer than this. Let's face it, 'they' released their bio-weapon in a less secure country and you still sussed them within days.

Where are the real evil geniuses when you need them? We're surrounded by fools!

But the devil does not need to cover his tracks next to no one believes in him

Gary L · 30-04-2009, 09:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

Where are the real evil geniuses when you need them? We're surrounded by fools!

It's a bit more advanced than the world being round as opposed to being flat Chris

Russ · 30-04-2009, 09:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L

Yes, but they don't need the hassle of it all. and it's worldwide terrorism that they want to test.

Supposition again.

Worldwide terrorism....which isn't doing anything other than making people sneeze a lot.

Nugget · 30-04-2009, 09:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by piggy

so to summarise the last few posts, the new zealand rugby team invented the virus and we are all going to die in a nuclear holocaust!! have i missed anything

With a name like yours, you may want to back away from this thread - I have a feeling that I know where the fingers are going to be pointing next

Gary L · 30-04-2009, 09:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

Supposition again.

Worldwide terrorism....which isn't doing anything other than making people sneeze a lot.

Testing Russ. you're not taking notice.

Russ · 30-04-2009, 09:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L

Testing Russ. you're not taking notice.

I admit I find it difficult to pay attention to ludicrous supposition. With the level of paranoia in the world today you'd think "they" would have covered their tracks a bit better than this. Instead armchair experts around the world have rumbled them already.

Gary L · 30-04-2009, 09:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

I admit I find it difficult to pay attention to ludicrous supposition.

But you have no problem questioning it.

Russ · 30-04-2009, 09:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L

But you have no problem questioning it.

An ability I've picked up from various CF members.

I see absolutely nothing in assuming it's any sort of conspiracy. If I went in to a packed cinema and shouted 'fire' then I could end up prosecuted for a Public order offence.

But stirrers can go on websites, newspapers, tv, radio etc do the same about a global conspiracy and get away with it.

Gary L · 30-04-2009, 09:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

An ability I've picked up from various CF members.

I see absolutely nothing in assuming it's any sort of conspiracy. If I went in to a packed cinema and shouted 'fire' then I could end up prosecuted for a Public order offence.

But stirrers can go on websites, newspapers, tv, radio etc do the same about a global conspiracy and get away with it.

Do you think they should be prosecuted for supposing something, other than what hasn't been proved?
Or should they just be ridiculed for even thinking outside the common sense line of thinking?

Russ · 30-04-2009, 10:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L

Do you think they should be prosecuted for supposing something, other than what hasn't been proved?
Or should they just be ridiculed for even thinking outside the common sense line of thinking?

Well some people aren't supposing - they're not only convinced (based on very little evidence) but they're also insisting if we don't go along with them too then we're apparently 'scared'.

30-04-2009, 10:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

An ability I've picked up from various CF members.

I see absolutely nothing in assuming it's any sort of conspiracy. If I went in to a packed cinema and shouted 'fire' then I could end up prosecuted for a Public order offence.

But stirrers can go on websites, newspapers, tv, radio etc do the same about a global conspiracy and get away with it.

Paranoia is a clinical symptom of a lot of mild mental disorders some of your stirrers may actually be ill

Raistlin · 30-04-2009, 10:20

Ok, enough.

Time out.

Stand back, take a deep breath, count to 10 minutes.

---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 ----------

Seconds out, round 18.

Please feel free to discuss the topic in a sensible and adult manner.