| 
	
		
 
 WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  20-02-2009, 21:37 | #31 |  
	| cf.geek 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: great yarmouth Services: Zen Fibre, Asus RT-AC68U 
					Posts: 900
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			wish the EU would mandate all new devices must have WPA.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  26-02-2009, 01:36 | #32 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Nottingham Age: 41 Services: VM 10Mb Cable (L), Phone (M) and TV (M) 
					Posts: 76
				 | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			OP: thinking about it, can you pick up a cheap USB Wifi dongle from somewhere? Connect this to your PC and create a second ad-hoc WiFi (WEP-encrypted) network between it and your DS. Create a network bridge and setup ICS. When you are not playing leave the dongle unconnected to minimise security risk.
 Any good?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  26-02-2009, 19:50 | #33 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Peterborough 
					Posts: 5,106
				 | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo  Well I can't buy a DSi because 
 a) I already have a DS, and
 B) it's not available in Pink
 
 Anyway I heard that the DSi will only offer WPA compatibility for software thats specifically written for the DSi. So a copy of mario karts on the DS will still only work with WEP.
 
 |  If you trade your DS Lite in at Game they will give you 50% off of a DSi
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  27-02-2009, 10:38 | #34 |  
	| Virgin Media Employee 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Winchester Services: Staff MyRates  
BB: VM 1Gb
TV: VM XL
Phone : VM XL 
					Posts: 3,328
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			If you are planning to upgrade the router why not keep the old one and set it up as a WEP access point only switching it on when you need to use the DS.  You could possibly plop it into a DMZ from the new router so if anyone does break in they can't see you home LAN and if the new router has a proper switch they won't be able to see other traffic either.
		 
				__________________I work for VMO2 but reply here in my own right.  Any help or advice is made on a best-effort basis. No comments construe any obligation on VMO2 or its employees.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  27-02-2009, 13:38 | #35 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 
					Posts: 4,291
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by tweetiepooh  If you are planning to upgrade the router why not keep the old one and set it up as a WEP access point only switching it on when you need to use the DS. You could possibly plop it into a DMZ from the new router so if anyone does break in they can't see you home LAN and if the new router has a proper switch they won't be able to see other traffic either. |  
Thanks for that - This is what I'm going to look at once I get my new router.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  28-02-2009, 23:53 | #36 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Somewhere in the UK Services: Sky 
					Posts: 255
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			Fearmongering is mostly at the core of this stuff.
 Yes WEP can be cracked fairly easily,  however your wireless router has a max range and at a guess is advertised at 300 or so meters.  This is also reduced by the fabric of your abode. e.g. some houses cannot get wireless upstairs if the router is downstairs.
 
 Which basically means someone attempting to break into your router is either a neighbour or parked outside your house.  Following this line the said person is either simply trying to get free broadband or hack your system.
 
 Either way just getting connected to your router doesn't automatically give access to your computer.  It doesn't work that way.
 
 One primary argument you will see is something like Online Banking.  Even if someone were to get access to your router the other party even scanning promiscuously will still see SSL encrypted traffic.
 
 There are many steps to totally cracking a system not one.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-03-2009, 07:50 | #37 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Peterborough Services: Virgin Media XL
Broadband XL
Virgin Mobile
V+ installed!
and a happy Virgin Media customer 
					Posts: 2,560
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by mischievious  Fearmongering is mostly at the core of this stuff.
 Yes WEP can be cracked fairly easily, however your wireless router has a max range and at a guess is advertised at 300 or so meters. This is also reduced by the fabric of your abode. e.g. some houses cannot get wireless upstairs if the router is downstairs.
 
 Which basically means someone attempting to break into your router is either a neighbour or parked outside your house. Following this line the said person is either simply trying to get free broadband or hack your system.
 
 Either way just getting connected to your router doesn't automatically give access to your computer. It doesn't work that way.
 
 One primary argument you will see is something like Online Banking. Even if someone were to get access to your router the other party even scanning promiscuously will still see SSL encrypted traffic.
 
 There are many steps to totally cracking a system not one.
 |  I tend to agree. I think you need to put as many layers in to make it as difficult as possible for anyone to be able to use  your network - in the hope that they'll move on and try elsewhere. 
Fitting a five lever mortice lock doesn't stop a burglar, but adding security lights, burglar alarm, joining a neighbourhood watch scheme, having a dog - all these things together deter the criminal. One on its own would not as much.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-03-2009, 14:42 | #38 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 
					Posts: 4,291
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			How hard easy is MAC filtering to crack?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-03-2009, 23:36 | #39 |  
	| cf.geek 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: great yarmouth Services: Zen Fibre, Asus RT-AC68U 
					Posts: 900
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			on linux
 ifdown eth0
 macchanger -r eth0
 ifup eth0
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-03-2009, 00:22 | #40 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotlands biggest region Services: TV,Phone & BB 
					Posts: 2,086
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| on linux 
 ifdown eth0
 macchanger -r eth0
 ifup eth0
 |  Thats just changing your own mac to some random one and not actually "cracking" any hidden mac.   
	Quote: 
	
		| How hard easy is MAC filtering to crack? |  You dont have to "crack" a MAC as such.You just need the right tools to make that hidden MAC visible.Then if you were using Linux you could indeed install Macchanger as per the previous post to then change your own MAC accordingly but you dont actually need to install anything change your own mac.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-03-2009, 00:41 | #41 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Somewhere in the UK Services: Sky 
					Posts: 255
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by deadite66  on linux
 ifdown eth0
 macchanger -r eth0
 ifup eth0
 |  Technically this would be the final step as the above simply sets your mac to a random mac which still won't give access to another system if mac filtering is in place.
 
You would first have to break the encryption between a client system and the router in order to read the traffic and find out what a legitimate mac is.  Then you could spoof (using a method similar to above, p.s. to do the above in windows is a reg key and reboot) the mac address of that client machine.  
 
Though you still have problems here as you will have extemely sporadic network traffic at best as the router would have two different clients with the same mac.  It goes on quite a bit more than this but this is enough for the time being.
 
Hence my comment there are many levels to crack a system.  It is not always easy but it happens on rare occasions.  As an example a director in my company set up his own web/ftp server (IT had no contact with it) and it was running for 6 + years before it was hacked.  Nothing fancy, a simple error he left the Administrator account enabled with a blank password by mistake.
 
Yes mac filtering is crude and on its own is not recommended but it can be quite an effective deterrent.
---------- Post added at 23:41 ---------- Previous post was at 23:37 ---------- 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by xpod  . |  That'll teach me for long posts    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-03-2009, 12:07 | #42 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotlands biggest region Services: TV,Phone & BB 
					Posts: 2,086
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| That'll teach me for long posts |  I now write long posts in a text editor....partly for that reason   
	Quote: 
	
		| Yes mac filtering is crude and on its own is not recommended but it can be quite an effective deterrent. |  As you mentioned previously it`s all about the neighbors i`d say,in a home environment anyway.The chances of some idiot parked outside are relatively slim so that really only leaves those living around you. 
Most of the people i know that do use wireless happily get away with WEP and MAC Filtering(now that it`son  in many cases)when thats all their hardware is capable of but all it takes is one little skiddie living close enough with a capable wireless card/dongle and those routers/networks may well become the little git`s test ground.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  14-08-2009, 05:48 | #43 |  
	| Inactive 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2009 
					Posts: 1
				      | 
				
				Re: WEP, WPA or MAC Filtering - Which is best
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Matt D  You could get the Nintendo WiFi dongle thing. It's basically a USB WiFi adaptor for your PC which uses a proprietary encryption method supported by the DS. 
 Instead of dropping the router's security down to the easily defeated WEP, so you can connect the DS to it, the DS wirelessly connects to the USB WiFi adaptor, which shares your PC's internet connection with the DS using ICS (Internet Connection Sharing).
 |  I'm sorry about bumping such an old thread but i read the faq and it doesn't seem to be any problem with doing so. 
The thing is i'm having the same trouble as the OP of this thread , i really dont want to use wep security since it sucks. 
So i want to ask , what is that propietary encryption thing ? (im not that knowledgable about this stuff)  
what if i have a connection like this: 
Adsl modem->Wireless Router(WPA2 encryption)->PC(wired) and Laptop(wireless)  
If i connect this nintendo usb dongle thing to my PC , will this allow me to use the ds properly (maybe the dongle doesnt care its in WPA2 and it transmists the wireless connection as WEP?) does this mean mi pc will still be vulnerable as if i was using WEP for the whole thing? or is it safe?  
what if i were using a simpler connection like : 
Adsl modem->PC (wired) .. and i plug the dongle to my pc.Is it a good idea to do this or i cant still get hacked because of the dongle using wep?
 
If i didnt explain something correctly please tell me.I've been looking for information about this situation but i cant find anything,so i really hope you guys can help me.Thanks.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:49. |