Can someone confirm this... - Page 4

tvtimes · 23-07-2008, 18:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by whydoIneedatech

He has a 10% Personal share not company share so the will be companies with bigger slices than him.

Still he isn't the largest shareholder as this security guard suggested. He doesn't even have a seat on the board so no influence on the company as a whole apart from he can threaten to pull the virgin name if it damages the brand.

23-07-2008, 18:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by tvtimes

Still he isn't the largest shareholder as this security guard suggested. He doesn't even have a seat on the board so no influence on the company as a whole apart from he can threaten to pull the virgin name if it damages the brand.

Individual share is what I said, as a person not a company.

Of course he is not on the board because they are only leasing his brand name.

nexy33 · 25-07-2008, 06:10

Ntl needed a new disguise for there shoddy services and shitty customer support they found it and soiled it its now called virgin media

tvtimes · 25-07-2008, 18:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by whydoIneedatech

Individual share is what I said, as a person not a company.

Of course he is not on the board because they are only leasing his brand name.

But he doesn't have a individual share. He owned Virgin mobile which was part of Virgin group. He swapped Virgin groups virgin mobile for shares but the shares are owned by Virgin group not individual like you keep saying. Richard Branson did a straight swap.