What did hit the Pentagon?

[Hom3r]

In the video of something that hit the pentagon (bear in mind this is one of the most protected building in the world and the best video that had was worst that the average supermarket.

The "Plane" that hit the Pentagon was supost to be a 757 this has a wing span of some 124ft. and on each wing are two Rolls-Royce engines, each weighing about 3 tons.

It hit the Pentagon leaving a near perfect circle, there was no visibale damage from the engines that would have hit the building nor was there any marks that the Horizontal & vertical stabilisers would have caused.

Plus people who where inside the building could smell cordite (a propelant used in explosives.)

Below is a link to a site that may help.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

[dilli-theclaw]

I'd prefer some REAL evidence.

Still you carry on believing what you want

[shawty]

Originally Posted by Hom3r

In the video of something that hit the pentagon (bear in mind this is one of the most protected building in the world and the best video that had was worst that the average supermarket.

The "Plane" that hit the Pentagon was supost to be a 757 this has a wing span of some 124ft. and on each wing are two Rolls-Royce engines, each weighing about 3 tons.

It hit the Pentagon leaving a near perfect circle, there was no visibale damage from the engines that would have hit the building nor was there any marks that the Horizontal & vertical stabilisers would have caused.

Plus people who where inside the building could smell cordite (a propelant used in explosives.)

Below is a link to a site that may help.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

CCTV isnt meant to catch things going as fast as 100MPH +, they simply cant capture the image of something going at speed properly.

But there was engines in the wreckage at the pentagon, the same engines that would be on the plane that you say never crashed there.

[Hom3r]

The Image quality was very poor and grainy, thats what I was getting at.

Two engines hitting a wall would leave some kind of mark.

[Russ]

Originally Posted by Hom3r

The Image quality was very poor and grainy, thats what I was getting at.

Two engines hitting a wall would leave some kind of mark.

I always thought planes were designed so their wings (and engines) would 'fold' back in the event of a head-on crash?

[BBKing]

Planes aren't designed to crash into anything at 300mph any more than car park CCTV is designed to film high speed impacts. The predicted effect would be pretty much instant disintegration, an explosion and the engines carrying on for a bit. Other similar crashes follow much the same pattern.

But there was engines in the wreckage at the pentagon

Quite. Clear photos of an RB211 damaged by a severe frontal impact, in fact. Muppets think this is the engine out of a drone, because the RB211 is a lot *wider*, man, neglecting to understand the basics of high-bypass ratio turbofans (which I'd expect Hom3r to know, oddly enough. Surely you can apply some sort of test based on your own knowledge of your job to the aeronautical muppetry of these people and conclude that they're barking?).

Two engines hitting a wall would leave some kind of mark.

Like a hole through several walls with a heavily damaged engine at the end? Like the one found in, er, the Pentagon?

Who the hell started this one up again?

Go on shawty go find 'the landings on the moon were a conspiracy' thread and see if you can resurrect that one...

[shawty]

Originally Posted by Hom3r

The Image quality was very poor and grainy, thats what I was getting at.

Two engines hitting a wall would leave some kind of mark.

Most if not all CCTV is grainy, thats nothing new.

You still never answered the question. If a passanger plane did not hit the pentagon, what did? Also, there are photos of engines at the pentagon that are the same as the plane that was supposed to of crashed into the pentagon.

Nearly got drawn in again................


Phew, that was a close one.

Originally Posted by foreverwar

Nearly got drawn in again................


Phew, that was a close one.

What a pity we can't meet down the pub...I feel we are kindred spirits..

[ikthius]

who cares??????

its so old.....

another thing that really annoys me, is that diana still gets talked about in that crash, who cares now?????????

nothing can be done about it all now.

Diana is dead dodi is dead...... get over it.

and so is this topic, who cares what hit the pentagon, even if the conspiricy of america done it, I dont care...... it has passed and nothing we can do now will stop it..

put these ones to bed for gods sake

[Mal]

Originally Posted by ikthius

put these ones to bed for gods sake

You mean in the same bed as Roswell '47 and JFK

Conspiracies will never disappear unfortunately

[shawty]

Originally Posted by ikthius

who cares??????

its so old.....

another thing that really annoys me, is that diana still gets talked about in that crash, who cares now?????????

nothing can be done about it all now.

Diana is dead dodi is dead...... get over it.

and so is this topic, who cares what hit the pentagon, even if the conspiricy of america done it, I dont care...... it has passed and nothing we can do now will stop it..

put these ones to bed for gods sake

If you dont like it, then dont come in. Some people still like to talk about these things. Its one of if not the biggest event in the history of mankind.

[ikthius]

Originally Posted by shawty

If you dont like it, then dont come in. Some people still like to talk about these things. Its one of if not the biggest event in the history of mankind.

see ya

Originally Posted by shawty

If you dont like it, then dont come in. Some people still like to talk about these things. Its one of if not the biggest event in the history of mankind.

No not the biggest event.WW1,WW11,Hiroshima,The Berlin Wall going up and coming down,The Holocaust were all far bigger events.