29-09-2004, 21:42
|
#46
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: 3DMark05...
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 01:55
|
#47
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 47
Posts: 6,343
|
Re: 3DMark05...
2524 on mine. 
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=18195
Main specs:
AMD Athlon64 FX-53
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
1GB PC3200 RAM
All at stock...nice CPU score though.
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 09:22
|
#48
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Richard M
nice CPU score though.
|
Heh, jamesclarke555's P4 beat it though :p
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 10:56
|
#49
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Not wanting to get the whole AMD / Intel debate started again, but surely there is something wrong with that calculation?
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 11:25
|
#50
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 47
Posts: 6,343
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bifta
Heh, jamesclarke555's P4 beat it though :p
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Richard M
..stock...
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 11:33
|
#51
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 51
Posts: 7,101
|
Re: 3DMark05...
I can't believe I just read all the messages in this thread - Sheesh, I must be bored! 
Anyway, nice weather we're having, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 11:54
|
#52
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: 3DMark05...
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 12:02
|
#54
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Weird ... I tried reclocking my X800 back to PE speeds and my resevoir, radiator and hoses nearly reached boiling point ... I'm sure that's not right
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 14:37
|
#55
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Bifta - you are using the XT PE BIOS arent you and not the PRO BIOS. I could'nt get anywhere near the speeds i get now with the PRO bios, only after i tried the XT BIOS was i able to OC much.
But your Watercooling heating up that much sounds - worrying - im stock cooling on my X800.
Just got the new AtiTool as well (0.0.23 Beta 4) which supports Find Max Mem / Core on the X800, and its looking like 546 is rock on the memory so far - so i might get a higher score still.
Not even tried find max core yet.
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 14:42
|
#56
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by theblueraja
Bifta - you are using the XT PE BIOS arent you and not the PRO BIOS. I could'nt get anywhere near the speeds i get now with the PRO bios, only after i tried the XT BIOS was i able to OC much.
But your Watercooling heating up that much sounds - worrying - im stock cooling on my X800.
Just got the new AtiTool as well (0.0.23 Beta 4) which supports Find Max Mem / Core on the X800, and its looking like 546 is rock on the memory so far - so i might get a higher score still.
Not even tried find max core yet. |
That must be where I'm going wrong, I thought that the PE bios would automatically OC the card to PE speeds and wanted more control over it.
Where's the best place to get a working PE bios?
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 14:58
|
#57
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southampton
Age: 43
Posts: 1,089
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Richard M, For a quick an easy score boost try the beta cat 4.10 drivers, they give around a 20% boost in 3rd score. Oddly my cpu score is unstable and was also affected by the driver update, on my first bench it got 4200 somthing with a large boost to the first cpu test, ever since i havent been able to get close to it, even with pushing the cpu harder and stuff. though second cpu test has gone up so the score is about equal there.
Interesting to see someone has got an alledged ti4200 to go through the bench and kick out simply a stunning score, me thinks its hacked though.
Have a look for yourselves http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=19126
Edit, bah project has been removed now must of been fake
K
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 15:43
|
#59
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bifta
That must be where I'm going wrong, I thought that the PE bios would automatically OC the card to PE speeds and wanted more control over it.
Where's the best place to get a working PE bios?
|
Go here -
http://www.techpowerup.com/bios/?sea...&Submit=Search
You will find loads of BIOS's for your card there. I dont think that any one is better than the other, although i am using the ATI BIOS (Samsung 1.6- 2004-07-15 17:45).
Good luck.
EDIT - YES the BIOS DOES OC the card to PE speeds - BUT - use ATITool linked to above and underclock it (forced) so that when windows loads it defaults back to the PRO speeds. Then use ATITool to find out your MAX mem and core speeds then use that setting instead.
There will soon be BIOS editors available that will let us hard code the clock speeds.
|
|
|
|
|
30-09-2004, 15:46
|
#60
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: 3DMark05...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by theblueraja
|
See my last post (using the Powercolor XT PE bios, same brand)
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:13.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
