Mum had sex with son

What ever that was, thank you for removing it Mick

I'm not posting anything else on this topic, do be truthful it's starting to freak me out

[yorkiex]

That guy looks like someone i know lol. There are some wierd ppl out there, God man that is dirty. This is sending shivers down my spine. Anyway think of the husband if the minger has 1. Think of what she said to him:

wife: err malcom (or whatever his name is) im havin an affair
Husband: Ho my god just tell me who its with plz
Wife: erm its with our son
Husband:

lol

[poolking]

I take it the edited post by Mick is the reason that Jerrek has been banned?

Originally Posted by Graham

Ok, let's have a quick summary here:

1) There are some people who think that incest is wrong, full stop, not even when it involves consenting adults and is not for procreation.

2) There are some who think that what consenting adults do in private is nobody's business but their own.

On the first point I have not seen *any* reasonable proof or logical argument to back up *why* it is wrong, just circular arguments of "it's wrong because it's incest and incest is wrong" and "it disgusts me and lots of others" which, whilst emotive, is not exactly a reasonable argument.

On the second point I have seen reasoned arguments in favour this, yet I haven't seen anyone demonstrate *why* what consenting adults do (especially if not for procreation) should be the business of others.

Frankly I have no more interest in contributing to this thread because I enjoy having a reasonable debate but I'm not going to hang around to simply be abused for simply holding a "non-majority" viewpoint.

Graham, to be fair, if holding a 'non-majority' viewpoint, was the whole point, you would have a point, and no doubt a dog called Arrow

- but, people have been expressing how they feel & what their opinion is about this emotive subject - there can be no "proof or logical argument", for that?

- in my view, this is one issue where keeping one's own council (counsel?) is best

Personally the thought of a mother engaging in a sexual activity with her son at any age be it 18, 16 or 30 or whatever makes me sick to the stomach, how some people can say its got nothing to do with anyone is beyond me, if it wrecks families its got every bloody right to do with other members of the immediate family.

Originally Posted by poolking

I take it the edited post by Mick is the reason that Jerrek has been banned?

Was not only thing. So he's now gone. Harmony has now been restored again and do not even think of re-registering again Jerrek.

I saw this in another thread and I think its rather good and applies here for future reference:-

[SMHarman]

Originally Posted by Graham

Ok, let's have a quick summary here:

1) There are some people who think that incest is wrong, full stop, not even when it involves consenting adults and is not for procreation.

<snip>

Frankly I have no more interest in contributing to this thread because I enjoy having a reasonable debate but I'm not going to hang around to simply be abused for simply holding a "non-majority" viewpoint.

I think I would put myself in the first camp, the reason being that for those two consenting adults to get to that position it has probably resulted from an upbringing that indicated that such relationships were normal and acceptable, when in reality that is not the perception of the majority. I would also imagine that those involved had probably been in a relationship that was abusive to some degree, mental or physical, as someone has commented earlier, if the son can only show his love to his mother in a sexual physical manner then that relationship needs work.

If those involved had a healthy upbringing and decided that they really were the ones for each other then so be it, some DNA testing and they can procreate for all I care.

I guess where this is heading is that I think the current situation has arisen due to issues that social services and welfare should have picked up and managed a decade or so ago.

On the other unsnipped part of your post I would like to thank you for your reasoned and well constructed opposing viewpoint. Para 2 above would probably not have existed 290 posts ago, though this has run its course, especially if Jerrek, normally controversial, though not normally banning material has got there.

[punky]

Damnit, I'm away for a day and I miss all the fun. I don't know if it has been said before (lot of pages to check through, but i'll say it again just in case)

Originally Posted by Graham

Ok, let's have a quick summary here:

1) There are some people who think that incest is wrong, full stop, not even when it involves consenting adults and is not for procreation.

...

On the first point I have not seen *any* reasonable proof or logical argument to back up *why* it is wrong, just circular arguments of "it's wrong because it's incest and incest is wrong" and "it disgusts me and lots of others" which, whilst emotive, is not exactly a reasonable argument.

The obvious point in my mind is the reason they made Incest illegal in the first place. I.e. If the woman was impregnated, then that child would run the very high risk of serious deformaties from recessive genes meeting. Now you could argue that way that what if you use contraception? Well, no, because no contraception is 100%. And then you could get the idea, what about if they agree to have an abortion, in case? Well, that leads to another moral minefield. Generally it is best to err on the side of caution, i'd think.

Second point about the morals. Morals are subjective opinions, and noone has the right answer, regardless of what it might be. There is no right answer.

And I'm not picking on you here Graham. Just happened to be the first post I came across relevant to what I wanted to say. I'm not attacking you or anything.

[Xaccers]

I would bet that there are several members of this forum who wouldn't have been alive if not for incest.
No I am not talking about your parents so don't get offended!
Trace your families back to your greatgrandparents or further and you may be suprised!
Now there's a scary thought to leave you with!

[Xaccers]

Originally Posted by Electrolyte

His mother had sex with him WITHOUT his consent (I think) which is why this went to court.

Have you got a link to this new info?

Exactly how can someone force a man to get an erection?

I'm not even going there.

[greencreeper]

I think this thread serves as a good example of why I cringe when I glance at the thread listing for the Current Affairs forum, and why I think forums are better off not discussing current affairs. It's a troll playground and about as safe as a circus skills day at the RNIB.

Originally Posted by greencreeper

I think this thread serves as a good example of why I cringe when I glance at the thread listing for the Current Affairs forum, and why I think forums are better off not discussing current affairs. It's a troll playground and about as safe as a circus skills day at the RNIB.

What?

Sorry If I'm stupid

[greencreeper]

Originally Posted by Electrolyte

What?

Sorry If I'm stupid

If you could expand your question a little...

I didn't get a word you said basically

[poolking]

Originally Posted by Electrolyte

I didn't get a word you said basically

I think he may be referring to Jerrek's pre ban comments?