1mb going slower. - Page 3

Chris W · 13-05-2004, 17:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing

monkeybreath, remember that you can be on the same UBR and have considerably different browsing experiences depending on which downstream/upstream channels you're on. Is John S on the same upstream you are?

true enough... i dont know which upsteam john s is on yet cos i haven't got his details, but all of the issues with the cwbrula router that were going on in september time last year have been resolved and i haven't heard of any problems with it since then.

My first guess is that it is a proxy issue.

13-05-2004, 17:39

1Mb service on NTL is a touch flakey, sometimes its spot on other times it leaves a lot to be desired.

OT bit

At work i thought i'd do a speed test..........Get ready.......

Thu, 13 May 2004 16:38:26 UTC
1st 128K took 21 ms = 6241524 Bytes/sec = approx 51929 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec

John S · 13-05-2004, 18:51

Hi,

I just got home from work Email is down no messages after 2 timeouts of a minute web is up and working OK so far, think it will be the other way round in an hour so Ill be able to read my Email when the connection slows.

John S.

Florence · 14-05-2004, 17:26

After a visit from Bill C I have now taken this speed test

Quote:

Fri, 14 May 2004 16:22:55 GMT
1st 128K took 1071 ms = 122383 Bytes/sec = approx 1018 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1061 ms = 123536 Bytes/sec = approx 1028 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1072 ms = 122269 Bytes/sec = approx 1017 kbits/sec

Thanks Bill for sorting out the connection after being told there is nothing wrong with my connection on after calling in. NTL we need more like Bill to save your customers from giving up and moving over to ADSL.

**Paul** · 14-05-2004, 20:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by timewarrior2001

Thu, 13 May 2004 16:38:26 UTC
1st 128K took 21 ms = 6241524 Bytes/sec = approx 51929 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec

Show off

Xtrm2Matt · 14-05-2004, 20:49

How do i do a speed test such as this?

paulyoung666 · 14-05-2004, 20:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by timewarrior2001

1Mb service on NTL is a touch flakey, sometimes its spot on other times it leaves a lot to be desired.

OT bit

At work i thought i'd do a speed test..........Get ready.......

Thu, 13 May 2004 16:38:26 UTC
1st 128K took 21 ms = 6241524 Bytes/sec = approx 51929 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 20 ms = 6553600 Bytes/sec = approx 54526 kbits/sec

bluddy hell are you plugged straight into the pipe or what

kronas · 14-05-2004, 20:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrm2Matt

How do i do a speed test such as this?

click on the link below:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robin.d...speedtest.html

Xtrm2Matt · 14-05-2004, 21:01

Fri, 14 May 2004 20:01:49 UTC
1st 128K took 1031 ms = 127131 Bytes/sec = approx 1058 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec

Thanks

kronas · 14-05-2004, 21:02

no problem, looking good for the 1meg service

Chrysalis · 14-05-2004, 22:08

ahhh gotta love nottingham proxies

test without going through my own proxy server

Fri, 14 May 2004 21:06:22 UTC
1st 128K took 1522 ms = 84645 Bytes/sec = approx 704 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1341 ms = 94432 Bytes/sec = approx 786 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1662 ms = 72825 Bytes/sec = approx 610 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1300 ms = 99476 Bytes/sec = approx 826 kbits/sec

through my proxy server

Fri, 14 May 2004 21:12:34 UTC
1st 128K took 1152 ms = 113778 Bytes/sec = approx 947 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1101 ms = 119048 Bytes/sec = approx 990 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1082 ms = 121139 Bytes/sec = approx 1008 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1051 ms = 124712 Bytes/sec = approx 1038 kbits/sec

John S · 14-05-2004, 22:21

Hi Monkeybreath,
As you are on the Cwmbwrla UBR is your Email working because mine isnt.
If yours is down as well I suggest the bloke who went home for the weekend and turned off the server to turn it back on LOL.

John.

**Paul** · 14-05-2004, 22:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

ahhh gotta love nottingham proxies

Yep - you certainly have

Fri, 14 May 2004 21:20:24 UTC
1st 128K took 1016 ms = 129008 Bytes/sec = approx 1073 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1047 ms = 125188 Bytes/sec = approx 1042 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1032 ms = 127008 Bytes/sec = approx 1057 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec

Rarely see anything below 1000 kbits/sec.

Chris W · 14-05-2004, 23:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by John S

Hi Monkeybreath,
As you are on the Cwmbwrla UBR is your Email working because mine isnt.
If yours is down as well I suggest the bloke who went home for the weekend and turned off the server to turn it back on LOL.

John.

my email is working fine at the moment mate... haven't had any problems with email for quite a long time (fingers crossed, now i am tempting fate!)

Chrysalis · 15-05-2004, 00:58

just ran it again speeds are normal now, they are very on and off. Pem are you in nottingham because since you dont have problems yourself I am wondering if they just work better for local users.