Please lose!

I agree. the general picture know is that men pay the women to bring up their children but have limited access. The other day a women came into our class and explained the rights of women if you got them preganet and it is unbelievable. The law regarding this is completely one-sided. Women are just as capable as men so how about we stop this one sided law?

I mean we are supposed to treat everyone the same but men get a worse deal and the general perception is that the women need help how come no feminist point out that in this case women are getting extra help which suggests they are not as capable as men which is sexist in both men and women?

[punky]

Although this bit came from the Sun, (do treat the following as you want, but here it is), but apparently, whatever the ruling she gets to yearly allowance, that doesn't include maintenance for children.

The whole rights of fathers issue is diabolical. We are treated as cash machines. All fine and well when we keep spitting out money, but woe betide anyone who wants to see their children more than what seems to be the statatory 2 weekends a month (The mothers say it is fair, to which i'd like to say, "well, if it is so fair, you have them for 4 days, and let their dad have them for the other 26/27". A shameful number of fathers at the moment refuse to have anything to do with their children, but we are hardly going to help the ones that DO want to be good fathers but alieninating them. [/rant again]

Sorry for the second rant against women, it's nothing personal, honest

[hairy_mick]

would it make a difference if the man was trying to take half the womans assets

[kronas]

Originally Posted by hairy_mick

would it make a difference if the man was trying to take half the womans assets

im a fair man, if it was the other way around yes.

[hairy_mick]

lol nice one