Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | tragedy....

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > General Discussion > Current Affairs
Register FAQ Community Calendar

tragedy....
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2004, 00:21   #16
xaq141175
Inactive
 
xaq141175's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Leicester
Age: 50
Posts: 205
xaq141175 will become famous soon enoughxaq141175 will become famous soon enoughxaq141175 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Yahoo to xaq141175
Re: tragedy....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
First of all as far as I know unintentional manslaughter doesn't exist I mean intentional manslaughter would be murder all manslaughter is unintentional
No, manslaughter and murder are not the same, they are seperate charges, and unintentional manslaughter does exist, it's more commonly refered to as 'involuntary manslaughter'. Unintentional manslaughter is when someone does something that results in death but the activity that lead to it isn't likely to lead to death. Manslaughter is when you do something that is likely to lead to death but you didn't intend to cause death. Murder is when you intend to cause death and perfrom an act to fullfill that intent. Laws deal with both THE ACT and THE INTENT (mens rea and actus reus).

Quote:
second of all he didn't do it on purpose and it was the effects of drug abuse and now she has to live with herself also she is not going to kill another child as she didnt want to in the first place
she didn't intend to kill her child but she acted in a way that lead to death. we are responsible for out actions regardless of intent. the only defense she might have is 'non compus mentus' meaning she could not be held responsible for her actions for some reason.

i think drug addicts should be held responsible for thier actions as they are responsible for thier addiction, being addicted to drugs is not like developing cancer or a mental illness in that it's ones actions that lead to the addiction and is avoidable.

you have no idea what she will or will not do in the future. however i think that druggies tend to repeat thier past behaviours.
xaq141175 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 09-05-2004, 00:38   #17
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: tragedy....

Interesting poing about non compus mentus and drug addicts.
What about a paranoid schizophrinic who doesn't take their medication and then kills someone?

I think you're right tho in that she won't be able to use it as an excuse, otherwise drink drivers would be able to use the same reason to get away with death by drink driving charges (Sorry guv I was intoxicated and non compus mentus)
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2004, 02:18   #18
Graham
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: tragedy....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Interesting poing about non compus mentus and drug addicts.
What about a paranoid schizophrinic who doesn't take their medication and then kills someone?
"A schizophrenic who tried to kill two women by pushing them off a Tube platform has been sent to a mental hospital indefinitely."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/3595053.stm

The only problem being is that under the current system AIUI, if someone has a problem that's "incurable" they can be released back into the community!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2004, 04:25   #19
xaq141175
Inactive
 
xaq141175's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Leicester
Age: 50
Posts: 205
xaq141175 will become famous soon enoughxaq141175 will become famous soon enoughxaq141175 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Yahoo to xaq141175
Re: tragedy....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
What about a paranoid schizophrinic who doesn't take their medication and then kills someone?
They are mentally ill and cannot be held responsible for thier own treatment ... although I'm not sure what the legal position of that would be. Thats the position I'd hold if I were on a jury. Should still be taken off the streets though.
xaq141175 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:41.


Server: lithium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum