03-05-2013, 16:24
|
#151
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Coventry
Services: Fusion Fibre 900
Posts: 1,791
|
Re: superhub 2
That's strange. Just had to reboot SH2 because network went all sluggish. I couldn't access files on NAS devices. Having rebooted through GUI all is OK again.
__________________
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Coventry
Services: FusionFibre/CityFibre (900Mb FTTP; Asus GT-AX11000 +3 iMesh nodes; Humax 2Tb TV box; Synology DS920+ used as Plex server (PlexWindblown)
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 16:25
|
#152
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob
current Superhub, and many standalone routers all allow wall mounting.
|
Only if you're a business customer.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 16:27
|
#153
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 15,888
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
]One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is whether the SH2 can actually use the full range of 5Ghz channels and not just 4 (the same as you can get at 2.4Ghz) like the old one.
|
Auto Compatibility
Auto Performance
36+40
40+36
44+48
48+44
52+56
56+52
60+64
64+60
100+104
104+100
108+112
112+108
116+120
120+116
124+128
128+124
132+136
136+132
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 16:31
|
#154
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
That's a little misleading Ben, there's plenty of other things that can screw the wireless and sticking it out of view is not really one of them.
|
No, but blocking it with a giant 40" metal sheet designed specifically to block EM radiation is not going to help.
---------- Post added at 15:30 ---------- Previous post was at 15:29 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan
Everyone knwos that the biggest cause of wireless interference comes from dogs wagging their tails and disrupting the signal.
|
I disagree.
http://consumerist.com/2012/03/02/ca...-cat-pictures/
---------- Post added at 15:31 ---------- Previous post was at 15:30 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry
Auto Compatibility
Auto Performance
36+40
40+36
44+48
48+44
52+56
56+52
60+64
64+60
100+104
104+100
108+112
112+108
116+120
120+116
124+128
128+124
132+136
136+132
|
Nice.
That's a pretty decent improvement, though if those settings actually stick it's breaking regulations again.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 16:35
|
#155
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 15,888
|
Re: superhub 2
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 17:17
|
#156
|
|
cf.member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 51
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
That's a pretty decent improvement, though if those settings actually stick it's breaking regulations again.
|
All the channels 100 and up use DFS - there's a message while it checks for radar installations. I'm just trying ch. 136+132 to see how it goes.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 17:37
|
#157
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
|
As far as wireless signal goes, standing up is superior to flat.
|
Qas any proof?
My 2 worse wifi routers happen to be VM superhub and BT homehub3, is it not coincidence they both stand up with lack of external antennaes?
A flat router with external antennaes is superior. But both BT and VM going for cosmetics. Although it seems VM have at least done some work on the superhub2 wifi performance.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 18:53
|
#158
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Up North - Where It's Grim
Age: 58
Posts: 2,501
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Qas any proof?
My 2 worse wifi routers happen to be VM superhub and BT homehub3, is it not coincidence they both stand up with lack of external antennaes?
A flat router with external antennaes is superior. But both BT and VM going for cosmetics. Although it seems VM have at least done some work on the superhub2 wifi performance.
|
My Asus RT-N56U stands upright, internal antennae and gives more than adequate performance.
Cheers
Grim
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 21:03
|
#159
|
|
a giant headend
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,169
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Nice.
That's a pretty decent improvement, though if those settings actually stick it's breaking regulations again.
|
When you first set it to anything but the auto modes it makes a song and dance about having to scan for nearby radar stations.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 21:27
|
#160
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: HALIFAX
Age: 49
Services: Maxi TV, Kids TV, Sky Cinema, Sky Sports, Netflix with ads,1 x Virgin 360 Box,3 x Virgin Stream Boxe
Posts: 362
|
Re: superhub 2
Yep according to my sam knows mines been brilliant better wifi as well
__________________
Yeah Mr White....SCIENCE
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 22:19
|
#161
|
|
Sad Doig Fan!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barry South Wales
Age: 69
Services: With VM for BB 250Mb service.(Deal)
Posts: 11,844
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
You realise BT are doing it as well?
|
As are other ISP's their customer base is ignorant though and just plug and play so end up on the 2.4GHz band.
Of the 72 wireless connections I can pick up with a scan there's 1 on the 5GHz band.-ME!
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 22:51
|
#162
|
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,845
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth
My Asus RT-N56U stands upright, internal antennae and gives more than adequate performance.
Cheers
Grim
|
... exactly. And you don'ind peops demanding that the N56U should be stood horizontal.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 23:06
|
#163
|
|
Sad Doig Fan!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barry South Wales
Age: 69
Services: With VM for BB 250Mb service.(Deal)
Posts: 11,844
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
... exactly. And you don'ind peops demanding that the N56U should be stood horizontal.
|
?????????????????
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 23:14
|
#164
|
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,845
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
?????????????????
|
Dunno - but whatever it was it was right.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|
03-05-2013, 23:41
|
#165
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 153
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
As are other ISP's their customer base is ignorant though and just plug and play so end up on the 2.4GHz band.
Of the 72 wireless connections I can pick up with a scan there's 1 on the 5GHz band.-ME!
|
All I know is that the wife doesn't complain anymore when trying to use the iPad in the kitchen with the microwave on.
The concurrent dual band works really well (worth £50?)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03.
|