Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Port 22 blocked?

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Service
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Which is best
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2005, 13:29   #1
Silent-One
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7
Silent-One is an unknown quantity at this point
Which is best

Hi

I've been having problems with my eratic pings whilst playing CoD:UO.
It seems to be a common thing amongst game users according to the postings on here.
I've been on to technical support and they have move me to a different upstream.

What I would like to know is, which is the best reading between these 2.....

1st Reading
Downstream channel
power level ..................... -3.67 dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio.......... 35dB
Upstream channel
power level ..................... -42.75 dBmV

2nd Reading
Downstream channel
power level ..................... -0.90dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio.......... 36dB
Upstream channel
power level ..................... -41.25dBmV

Cheers
Silent-One is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 16-07-2005, 01:05   #2
Silent-One
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7
Silent-One is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Which is best

Well after 66 views of this posting I take it no-one knows which is the best reading of the two.

Thanks anyway

Chris
Silent-One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2005, 01:13   #3
Paul
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,592
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Re: Which is best

See http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...ad.php?t=26006
__________________

Baby, I was born this way.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2005, 09:12   #4
Ignition
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South-East London
Age: 47
Services: Depends who's being serviced :p
Posts: 2,588
Ignition is cast in bronzeIgnition is cast in bronzeIgnition is cast in bronzeIgnition is cast in bronze
Ignition is cast in bronzeIgnition is cast in bronze
Re: Which is best

2nd reading, not that either is really relevant, sounds like congestion on the upstream.

Telewest obviously still haven't gotten the hang of load balancing That'll be something they learn from us when the inevitable happens
Ignition is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2005, 11:13   #5
Silent-One
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7
Silent-One is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Which is best

Thanks Ignition...the reason why i'm asking is because, I've played about due to lagging spikes during game play.
The 1st of the 2 readings what you see above is with a FAT -3dB Attentuator on a wireless network, While the 2nd one is without the Attentuator.

After taking myself of the wireless side and connecting via a normal lan cable and putting the Attentuator back on...........

Downstream channel
power level ..................... -1.84dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio.......... 36dB
Upstream channel
power level ..................... -39.50dBmV

4th Reading with the Attentuator taken back off and still on a lan cable

Downstream channel
power level ..................... -0.51dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio.......... 36dB
Upstream channel
power level ..................... -38.25dBmV

I'm now presuming that if the 2nd reading was the best out of the 1st 2 then the 4th reading is better out of the 4th.

Since the FAT -3dB Attentuator was fitted by an Engineer, there has been work done on the outside system quite a few times ie: blown Caps, Rewiring Etc

I did have a look at different postings like
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...ad.php?t=26006
aswell as others, but these were guides and didn't answer my actual question
so Thanks for all your help



Chris
Silent-One is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:06.


Server: lithium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum