VM position 50 meg as "premium"
08-08-2008, 12:50
|
#1
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 416
|
VM position 50 meg as "premium"
An article on the register today indicates that vm are going to put the 50meg service out at a premium
The firm announced strong underlying profits today and said it expects its forthcoming 50Mbit/s network upgrade to further distinguish it as a premium/expensive ISP.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/07/virgin_q2_2007/
No real surprise there but not sure they want to be establishing a mind set of being an "expensive" provider.
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 13:12
|
#2
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cardiff
Services: XL broadband
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
but you can go with that in all walks of life, rolls royce and bentleys, premium cars and expensive yet people still buy them, news servers as another example, giganews is a premoium service people still pay for that, i guess the word is quality
i see it as them trying to say they are a good quality provider being premium rather than being an expensive solution
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 13:25
|
#3
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
premium is the word to use, expensive is not
premium suggests better quality, expensive suggests higher cost for no reason
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 13:39
|
#4
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,951
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Quote:
Originally Posted by hokkers999
An article on the register today indicates that vm are going to put the 50meg service out at a premium
The firm announced strong underlying profits today and said it expects its forthcoming 50Mbit/s network upgrade to further distinguish it as a premium/expensive ISP.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/07/virgin_q2_2007/
No real surprise there but not sure they want to be establishing a mind set of being an "expensive" provider.
|
How can they class 50 meg as a premium service if they have already ruined it by putting STM on it.
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 13:51
|
#5
|
cf.addict
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 469
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Just by putting a Premium price on it
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 13:53
|
#6
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Midlands
Services: 20MB, TV+PHONE
Posts: 163
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
I would be prepared to pay a "premium" price for a "premium" service, i.e. not such silly STM and poor upload speeds. I would love 50Mb as much as the next person, but would not be prepared to pay £45-£50 a month for a service that is so heavily restricted and poor upload speeds. I hope VM manage to sort the cloners out by the time 50Mb comes around dont get freeloaders on that network aswell and ruin it for the people who will be prepared to pay the cost VM charge.
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 14:09
|
#7
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,951
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonglet
Just by putting a Premium price on it 
|
Well i for one would not pay a Premium price so they can rip me off with STM
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 14:26
|
#8
|
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scotland
Age: 43
Services: Virgin Media - XL Plus package with XXL broadband
SKY HD Multiroom
Freeview HD
Freesat HD
Posts: 2,816
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
I still do not see the point of them needing STM on DOCSIS3 for god sake it can easily handle heavy down loaders doing 50MB. i notice there no mention of the limits on 50MB probably be 8GB down and 2GB up.
Makes me wonder when 24Hour STM is coming. and then will be the time that virgin can no longer claim there service is unlimited.
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 14:37
|
#9
|
Guest
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
I will try it I think just so I can show off lol
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 14:41
|
#10
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nottingham
Services: XL 60/3
Posts: 356
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Well i for one would not pay a Premium price so they can rip me off with STM
|
I'm pretty sure it'll still be a success, look how many of us are happy to fork out for the current top tier, offering far less.
Its going to be more than twice as fast, for less than double the cost.. i'm sure VM are aware of this, they've got boffins y'know lol
I'm not saying its great value, but there are the uninformed few that'll never visit these forums, who seem to have money to burn & a need to tell everyone that they're still the king of the hill.
Bragging rights rule..
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthlinux
I will try it I think just so I can show off lol
|
 nuff said lol
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 14:56
|
#11
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In a pretty place.
Posts: 621
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewcrawford23
I still do not see the point of them needing STM on DOCSIS3 for god sake it can easily handle heavy down loaders doing 50MB. i notice there no mention of the limits on 50MB probably be 8GB down and 2GB up.
Makes me wonder when 24Hour STM is coming. and then will be the time that virgin can no longer claim there service is unlimited.
|
Despite the crap that VM pump out to the public, they dont have the bandwith available to support 50Mbit, even with docsis3, they over subscribe, they dont upgrade their backhaul to the network, endless loop, much easier just to STM users and blame "downloaders" instead of admitting they dont have the money to do any sort of real upgrades
You're limits are not that far off with the 50Mbit...
---------- Post added at 14:56 ---------- Previous post was at 14:55 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by watzizname
I'm pretty sure it'll still be a success, look how many of us are happy to fork out for the current top tier, offering far less.
Its going to be more than twice as fast, for less than double the cost.. i'm sure VM are aware of this, they've got boffins y'know lol
I'm not saying its great value, but there are the uninformed few that'll never visit these forums, who seem to have money to burn & a need to tell everyone that they're still the king of the hill.
Bragging rights rule..
 nuff said lol
|
And those are the people VM actually want, the "stupid" users who will subscribe to a service just for bragging rights and wont use it
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 15:09
|
#12
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harrogate, N Yorks
Services: Virgin Media DTV
Constant 20mb XL Broadband
Posts: 438
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
DOCSIS 3 can handle the speeds but as Trax has said the rest of the network cant. If anyone thinks VM will invest in the rest of the network then they are wrong. The same over-subscribed area's will continue to suffer the same plight as at some point down the line the DOCSIS 2 and DOCSIS 3 traffic will merge and the same problem will rear its ugly head. VM need to spend millions sorting out thier aging backhaul and national network and i cant see why they would go ahead with it when its much easier to blame the downloaders and STM the hell out of thier products. I did at one time beleive 50meg would come without STM but its looking more and more likely that VM will ruin another potentially great product.
Impz
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 16:15
|
#13
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle and Horsham
Services: On-cable: TV-L, BB-L, Phone-M.
Off-cable: Sky+ HD, Plusnet Unlimited.
Posts: 1,432
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
I can't see VM making changes to the core network until other providers are realistically able to offer a comparable service. I have noticed slow speeds to my servers in the USA which I know are capable of providing 30Mb speeds.
Be may offer a similar speed, but don't forget that they only offer it to people living 5Km from an unbundled exchange.
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 19:56
|
#14
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harrogate, N Yorks
Services: Virgin Media DTV
Constant 20mb XL Broadband
Posts: 438
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickendippers
Be may offer a similar speed, but don't forget that they only offer it to people living 5Km from an unbundled exchange.
|
To get the full 24meg you need to be dammed close to the exchange so realistically its prob about 500m from the exchange.
Impz
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 20:53
|
#15
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 416
|
Re: VM position 50 meg as "premium"
Quote:
Originally Posted by watzizname
I'm pretty sure it'll still be a success, look how many of us are happy to fork out for the current top tier, offering far less.
Its going to be more than twice as fast, for less than double the cost.. i'm sure VM are aware of this, they've got boffins y'know lol
|
Not all of us, I downgraded to the 2 meg service. Saved quite a bit so far. Unless STM is removed then I won't upgrade at all, period.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:09.
|