slow speed high pings

th'engineer · 23-03-2005, 22:43

anyone suggest any fix for this

racing route to www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]
ver a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1
3 263 ms 115 ms 259 ms 10.23.48.1
4 154 ms 213 ms 212 ms oldh-t2cam1-a-v115.inet.ntl.com [80.5.164.61]
5 204 ms * 268 ms mant-t2core-a-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [213.104.
41]
6 283 ms 259 ms 10 ms man-bb-a-so-230-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.57
7 244 ms 298 ms 221 ms man-bb-b-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.178]
8 174 ms 202 ms 268 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.13
9 239 ms * 142 ms win-dc-a-v903.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.34]
10 282 ms 364 ms 17 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]
race complete.

23-03-2005, 23:18

is that saying 263ms to get to your modem?

Ignition · 24-03-2005, 06:03

Not really Rochdale looks fine from here.

Double NAT on your LAN.. any particular reason for that, is a bit odd?

No I'm not blaming that for the high pings and slow speeds by the way!

th'engineer · 24-03-2005, 07:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignition

Not really Rochdale looks fine from here.

Double NAT on your LAN.. any particular reason for that, is a bit odd?

No I'm not blaming that for the high pings and slow speeds by the way!

I have had two routers for a while one single port wireless and one acting as a switch.
Ign any suggestions appreciated also got a speed reduction on a test to robin walkers speed test it was below 300 k

I have latest from robins testThu, 24 Mar 2005 07:50:31 UTC
1st 128K took 1172 ms = 111836 Bytes/sec = approx 930 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1125 ms = 116508 Bytes/sec = approx 969 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 531 ms = 246840 Bytes/sec = approx 2054 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 2110 ms = 62119 Bytes/sec = approx 517 kbits/sec

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:52:17 UTC
1st 128K took 10453 ms = 12539 Bytes/sec = approx 104 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 3625 ms = 36158 Bytes/sec = approx 301 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 7234 ms = 18119 Bytes/sec = approx 151 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 7219 ms = 18157 Bytes/sec = approx 151 kbits/sec

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:00:49 UTC
1st 128K took 3657 ms = 35841 Bytes/sec = approx 298 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 6859 ms = 19109 Bytes/sec = approx 159 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 6625 ms = 19784 Bytes/sec = approx 165 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 4547 ms = 28826 Bytes/sec = approx 240 kbits/sec

Also no not downloading at same time

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 4 ms 3 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1
3 44 ms 8 ms 8 ms 10.23.48.1
4 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms oldh-t2cam1-a-v115.inet.ntl.com [80.5.164.61]
5 10 ms 17 ms 62 ms mant-t2core-a-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [213.104.2
41]
6 53 ms 14 ms 9 ms man-bb-a-so-230-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.57]
7 51 ms 72 ms 10 ms man-bb-b-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.178]
8 15 ms 16 ms 16 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.138
9 322 ms 209 ms 126 ms win-dc-a-v903.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.34]
10 52 ms 28 ms 16 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]

th'engineer · 24-03-2005, 16:29

Update
Looks to be normal, must be glitch.

if someone fixed it thank you

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:27:56 UTC
1st 128K took 531 ms = 246840 Bytes/sec = approx 2054 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 531 ms = 246840 Bytes/sec = approx 2054 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 531 ms = 246840 Bytes/sec = approx 2054 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 532 ms = 246376 Bytes/sec = approx 2050 kbits/sec

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1
3 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.23.48.1
4 9 ms 9 ms 8 ms oldh-t2cam1-a-v115.inet.ntl.com [80.5.164.61]
5 9 ms 15 ms 12 ms mant-t2core-a-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [213.104.242
.41]
6 13 ms 20 ms 13 ms man-bb-a-so-230-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.57]
7 11 ms 10 ms 9 ms man-bb-b-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.178]
8 17 ms 16 ms 25 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.138]
9 16 ms 17 ms 15 ms win-dc-a-v903.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.34]
10 17 ms 16 ms 15 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]