31-12-2009, 17:57
|
#1
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Essex.
Services: VIVID 200 Broadband + BT Whole Home WiFi
Posts: 263
|
D-Link Cable Routers
Need a new router. Now had a Belkin N and Netgear N, both packed up and both left dead spots in my house.
Looking at DIR-655, DIR-825 or DIR-855. Specifically like the latter two because I've found some 9 dBi aerials, hopefully to get rid of that dead spot!
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 00:35
|
#2
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunny SouthEast
Services: VIP Pack
Posts: 692
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
i've had both the DIR-825 and now have the DIR-855 both are the best routers i've ever bought never had any drop-outs and i used to have dead spots but not since buying these, and if you wonder why i changed from one to the other just because i liked it :-)
but my personal recommendation would be to spend the bit extra and buy the DIR-855
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 08:45
|
#3
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virgin Islands
Age: 80
Services: VM Phone
152 Meg.
Posts: 1,552
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
I have the DIR-655 which I only use wired, I got it to replace my old £20 D-Link which ran for years without a glitch, only upgraded because it couldn't handle the full 50Mb.
The D-Link firmware is fast, feature rich and rock solid.
All the models you have listed are future proof with Gb switches throughout and upgradeable antenna's, although I am more than pleased with the 655 if I was buying today I would probably go for the 855 as saabmania suggests, your experience with the router will soon have you forgetting the initial cost.
I won't mention the POS Netgear I was forced to buy from VM when I upgraded to 50Mb as it's still a sore point with me.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:45
|
#4
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Essex.
Services: VIVID 200 Broadband + BT Whole Home WiFi
Posts: 263
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
Haha, apart from the obvious LCD screen. are there any difference between the 825 and 855?
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 18:56
|
#5
|
cf.geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wherever i lay my hat!
Age: 54
Posts: 736
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
D-Link DIR-655 is a good shout. Iv`e read on smallnetbuilder.com forum that a few people have had `issues` with the 825 firmware(whether this is overblown i don`t know)
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 12:44
|
#6
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunny SouthEast
Services: VIP Pack
Posts: 692
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruddock08
Haha, apart from the obvious LCD screen. are there any difference between the 825 and 855?
|
No not really i like the LCD screen but other than looks they seem fairly similar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty_
D-Link DIR-655 is a good shout. Iv`e read on smallnetbuilder.com forum that a few people have had `issues` with the 825 firmware(whether this is overblown i don`t know)
|
personally i never had any problems but yes your right there have been people with some issues with the firmware, but i'm sure they did release an update which sorted most problems out
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 21:27
|
#7
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Essex.
Services: VIVID 200 Broadband + BT Whole Home WiFi
Posts: 263
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
Brought DIR-825, thansk guys. /close
|
|
|
03-01-2010, 22:55
|
#8
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
ruddock, which 9 dBi aerials were you referring to ?
|
|
|
04-01-2010, 07:07
|
#9
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a world of no buffering!!
Services: Samsung V+ XL TV
XL Phone
30Mb Superhub
Samsung Galaxy 3 32GB sd card In a world of no buffering!
Posts: 20,915
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Gunslinger
ruddock, which 9 dBi aerials were you referring to ?
|
Something along these lines LINKY
|
|
|
04-01-2010, 09:47
|
#10
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
hmmm, thanks for the reply and link.... now a question !
I thought the aerials, in order to be suitable for Dual band, needed to be 5.0mhz compatible, because whilst 5mhz versiosn are suiatble for 2.4mhz, the reverse is not true. I ran into some posts about this last night while looking around, but dont have the links to hand right now, but none gave a difinative answer as to which particular aerial was tested and workin gon these units, so was hoping he might have done al the research already that i was going to have to do :p (lazy i know)
|
|
|
07-01-2010, 09:01
|
#11
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Essex.
Services: VIVID 200 Broadband + BT Whole Home WiFi
Posts: 263
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
I brought these: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...=STRK:MEWNX:IT
States they are 5.2 GHz, haven't arrived yet though (coming from HK)
|
|
|
07-01-2010, 20:25
|
#12
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
hmm, ok thanks, looks like you got a good price on them too.
i'm sort of leaning back towards getting a Netgear WDNR3700, which has internal antenna's so no option to change them like you can with external ones (or at least not so easily) but the link and ifon is still good, thank you
|
|
|
10-01-2010, 14:04
|
#13
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 95
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
I know it is late in the debate; I have a D-Link 635 (3 external sticks) been using for a year now with Dell and Tosh lappys plus Medion tower - no probs, rock solid. So this is my vote for D-Link.
|
|
|
12-01-2010, 18:27
|
#14
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Essex.
Services: VIVID 200 Broadband + BT Whole Home WiFi
Posts: 263
|
Re: D-Link Cable Routers
It's arrived, great looking router, don't have current hardware to test speeds but seems alright. 9dbi aerials added about 8% signal on 5 ghz frequency, but lost 15% on 2.4? :S
gone back to original aerials. now just need a way to get it to the room in the house which refuses to get signal..
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01.
|