View Single Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:38   #44
Paul K
Inactive
 
Paul K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Essex innit
Age: 52
Services: Sky HD + 16Mb ADSL BT Telephone
Posts: 15,735
Paul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered stars
Paul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered stars
Re: Trespasser wins payout of £567,00 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by me283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognitas
I would like to point out that at the time of of the original incident the person concerned was 9 years old...At the time he was too young to be prosecuted and indeed the law would regard him as being a victim AT THAT TIME because no 9 year old should be able to obtain such easy access to a site.The company were negligent.. and any child of 9 is deemed as not having the ability to view matters as an adult.

What ever else has happened in the interim has no bearing on the case.

I have to say that when I first read this story I thought the same as everyone else.That is until I reread it and noted how old he was when the accident occured.
And I would like to point out that at the age of 9 I was not out of sight of either my parents or a responsible adult. Perhaps he should have sued his parents (when they are released) and take away the money they made from their coke dealing?

9 years old... can't be expected to be responsible? Then he shouldn't be out on his own.

Jeeez, whatever next? "He ran out in front of a car, so the driver was negligent in knocking him over"?

He should get nothing.
Now you know we don't like agreeing with you Unfortunately a lot of people on this forum will have to for a change lol
Paul K is offline   Reply With Quote